Study on Efficacy and Safety of Chondroitin Sulfate + Glucosamine Hydrochloride Versus Celecoxib in Knee Osteoarthritis (MOVES)

January 29, 2016 updated by: Bioiberica

Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial On The Efficacy And Safety Of Chondroitin Sulfate And Glucosamine Hydrochloride In Combination Versus Celecoxib In Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the combination of Chondroitin sulfate (CS) and Glucosamine Hydrochloride (GH) has similar efficacy to Celecoxib (CE) in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to show that the combination treatment CS/GH has comparable efficacy to CE in pain reduction from baseline to 6 months of treatment measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale in knee OA patients with moderate to severe pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

606

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 40 years of age
  • Primary OA of the knee according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
  • OA of radiological stages II or III according to Kellgren and Lawrence
  • Patients with moderate-severe knee pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with active malignancy of any type or history of a malignancy within the last five years
  • Concurrent arthritic disease (antecedents and/or current signs) that could confound or interfere with the evaluation of pain efficacy such as chondrocalcinosis, Paget's disease of the ipsilateral limb to the target knee, rheumatoid arthritis, aseptic osteonecrosis, gout, septic arthritis, ochronosis, acromegaly, haemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, osteochondromatosis seronegative spondylo-arthropathy, mixed connective tissue disease, collagen vascular disease, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease
  • Pain in other parts of the body greater than the knee pain that could interfere with the evaluation of the index joint
  • Patients with fibromyalgia
  • Subjects with a history of heart attack or stroke, or who have experienced chest pain related to heart disease, or who have had serious diseases of the heart
  • Subjects with high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events
  • Subjects with any active acute or chronic infections requiring antimicrobial therapy, or serious viral (e.g., hepatitis, herpes zoster, HIV positivity) or fungal infections
  • Subjects with a history of recurrent Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) ulceration or active inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), a significant coagulation defect
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed as having or have been treated for oesophageal, gastric, pyloric channel, or duodenal ulceration within 30 days prior to receiving the first dose of study medication
  • Washout period for OA treatments before beginning the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chondroitin/Glucosamine (Droglican)

Active ingredients: Chondroitin sulfate, 200 mg and Glucosamine hydrochloride 250 mg.

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other specific antirheumatic agents. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC) code: M01CX.

Experimental
Other Names:
  • Chondroitin sulfate/ Glucosamine hydrochloride
Active Comparator: Celecoxib
Active ingredient: Celecoxib, 200 mg. Pharmacotherapeutic group: Coxibs. ATC code: M01AH.
Active comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WOMAC Pain Subscale
Time Frame: 6 months
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain subscale Score Range: 0 (no pain) - 500 (maximum pain) The study was designed such that the outcome of primary interest is knee pain related to OA. The measure selected to best evaluate this is an improvement in the WOMAC pain subscales. This subscale consists of 5 items which assesses the pain during walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying, and standing.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consumption of Rescue Medication
Time Frame: 6 months

Use of rescue medication as number of paracetamol tablets 500 mg since the last visit. The tablet count was reconciled with the patient diary.

Total Number of pills per month

6 months
WOMAC Stiffness Subscale
Time Frame: 6 months
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, from 0 No Stiffness to 200 Maximum Stiffness WOMAC stiffness subscale was used to measure the stiffness of the knee with pain. Two items are used to assess stiffness grade: after first waking and later in the day.
6 months
WOMAC Function Subscale
Time Frame: 6 months
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, from 0 No Function to 1700 Maximum Function WOMAC functional limitation subscale was used to measure the functionality of the knee with pain. Seventeen items are used to assess functionality of the knee: tair use, rising from sitting, standing, bending, walking, getting in / out of a car, shopping, putting on / taking off socks, rising from bed, lying in bed, getting in / out of bath, sitting, getting on / off toilet, heavy household duties, light household duties.
6 months
Huskisson's VAS
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual Analogue Scale: 0 No Pain 100 Maximum Pain Huskisson's VAS measures global pain intensity. Patients were asked to quantify their disease status on a 100 mm VAS as follows: "Please indicate the severity of knee pain experienced during the last 48 hours by marking a (I) through the line". Left hand marker represents "No pain" and right hand marker represents "The worst pain imaginable".
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Response as Defined by Outcome Variables for Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI)
Time Frame: 6 months

The OARSI Standing Committee for Clinical Trials Response Criteria Initiative and the OMERACT committee, in concert with the international rheumatology community, has led to the development of a uniform core set of outcome measures for OA. One of the objectives was to propose a set of criteria for measurement based on multiple domains to present the results of changes after treatment in symptomatic parameters as a single variable for clinical trials.

To be considered as responder patients should met one the following criteria:

  • High improvement in pain or in function ≥ 50% and absolute change ≥ 20 or
  • Improvement in at least 2 of the 3 following:

    • Pain ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 10
    • Function ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 10
    • Patient's global assessment ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 10
6 months
Percentage of Presence of Joint Swelling
Time Frame: 6 months
Study knees were evaluated at each visit for the presence or absence of swelling and/or effusion.
6 months
Percentage of Presence of Joint Effusion
Time Frame: 6 months
Study knees were evaluated at each visit for the presence or absence of swelling and/or effusion.
6 months
Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of Disease Activity
Time Frame: 6 months
Patients were asked to quantify their disease status on a VAS scale with range 0 mm (best) and 100 mm (worst) as follows: "Considering all the ways your arthritis of the knee affects you, mark (I) on the scale how well you are doing." Left hand marker "Very Well", Right hand marked "Very Poor".
6 months
Patient's and Investigator's Global Assessment of Response to Therapy
Time Frame: 6 months
The investigator were asked to evaluated the patient's response to therapy of the index knee by marking a (I) a VAS scale with range 0 mm (best) and 100 mm (worst) as follows: Left hand marker "Excellent-Best possible anticipated response, considering the severity and stage of the disease", right hand marker "None-no response, absence of drug effect".
6 months
Health Status According to EuroQoL
Time Frame: 6 months

EuroQoL-5D was a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. It was assessed at all of the study visits.

The EQ-5D-3L essentially consists of 2 pages - the EQ-5D descriptive system (page 2) and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (page 3). The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. Total scale range for each dimension reported is 1 to 3.

The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. This information can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual respondents.

Total scale range for VAS dimension reported is 0 to 100.

6 months
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 months
The safety evaluation was done in the set of randomized patients who took at least one dose of the medication
6 months
Number of Adverse Events Defined by Relationship With Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
The safety evaluation was done in the set of randomized patients who took at least one dose of the medication
6 months
Biomarker Analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
The following biomarkers will be evaluated: COMP, Coll2-1, Coll2-1 NO2 and Fib3-2
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jordi Monfort, MD, Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Chondroitin/Glucosamine (Droglican)

Subscribe