The Effect of Interscalene Peripheral Nerve Block With 0.25% Bupivacaine vs 0.125% Bupivacaine on Lung Function

December 9, 2013 updated by: Elizabeth Thackeray, University of Utah

Investigation Into the Effect of 0.25% Bupivacaine for Interscalene Peripheral Nerve Block vs 0.125% Bupivacaine on Pulmonary Function

Peripheral nerve blocks are used to provide post-operative pain relief. Nerve blocks in the neck, in the interscalene area, provide pain relief after shoulder surgery but can cause temporary weakness or paralysis of the diaphragm. The investigators hypothesized that a lower concentration of bupivacaine would cause less weakness of the diaphragm but still provide good pain relief. Lung function and pain control was studied after interscalene peripheral nerve block with 20 milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.125% bupivacaine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prior to placement of interscalene brachial plexus peripheral nerve block (ISPNB), diaphragm function was assessed using ultrasound as normal, no movement, or paradoxical. Room air pulse oximetry (SpO2) was recorded. Patients were randomized to receive either 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.125% bupivacaine. ISPNB was performed using a coded syringe of the study drug, so that the anesthesiologists performing the nerve block, the patient, and the nurses assessing the patient were blinded as to the concentration. Patients were given a general endotracheal anesthesia for rotator cuff repair, and opioids were administered at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. When patients met criteria for PACU discharge, diaphragm function was again assessed using ultrasound and room air SpO2 was recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ORTHOPAEDICS CENTER

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients presenting for outpatient rotator cuff repair
  • adults
  • English as the primary language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • evidence of peripheral nerve damage on affected side
  • refusal of peripheral nerve block
  • pregnant women
  • lung disease, including obstructive sleep apnea
  • chronic opioid use
  • mental handicap

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 0.25% bupivacaine
interscalene nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine
interscalene block with 20 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine
Active Comparator: 0.125% bupivacaine
interscalene nerve block with 0.125% bupivacaine
interscalene nerve block performed with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abnormal Lung Function
Time Frame: At discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery
Lung function was evaluated by examining diaphragm movement using ultrasound imaging and change in room air oxygen saturation (SpO2). Diaphragm movement was assessed using ultrasound as Normal (diaphragm moves caudad with inspiration), Abnormal (diaphragm does not move caudad with inspiration), and Paradoxical (diaphragm moves cephalad with inspiration). Both diaphragm function and room air SpO2 were assessed prior to any intervention to establish a baseline, and again on discharge from the PACU, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery.
At discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Relief
Time Frame: At discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery
Pain relief was assessed by recording the amount of opioid administered intraoperatively and in the PACU. The Visual Analogue Score of pain scores (0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable) were recorded at the time of discharge from the PACU, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery.
At discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery
Satisfaction With Pain Control
Time Frame: Within 30 days
A follow-up phone call was made to patients within 30 days of surgery to assess the presence of any complications related to the block and overall satisfaction with pain control. Overall satisfaction was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale of 1-not at all satisfied with pain control 2-mostly unsatisfied with pain control 3-slightly unsatisfied with pain control 4-no opinion 5-slightly satisfied with pain control 6-mostly satisfied with pain control 7-completely satisfied with pain control.
Within 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Thackeray, MD, MPH, University of Utah
  • Study Director: Jeffrey Swenson, MD, University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diaphragm Paralysis

Clinical Trials on interscalene block with 0.125% bupivacaine

3
Subscribe