Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Medical Patients

April 17, 2012 updated by: Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Models in Hospitalized Medical Patients

A systematic review and meta analysis will be performed of risk assessment models for Venous thromboembolism ("VTE" including pulmonary embolism "PE" and deep venous thrombosis "DVT")in hospitalized medical patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether the incidence of VTE is lower in patients that are evaluated with a risk assessment model and treated with thromboprophylaxis for their assigned level of risk.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

Venous thromboembolism ("VTE" including pulmonary embolism "PE" and deep venous thrombosis "DVT") is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Only about half of eligible hospitalized medical patients receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis. Understanding VTE risk factors predictive of VTE among hospitalized medical patients may promote superior thromboprophylaxis. To date a systematic review of VTE risk assessment strategies among hospitalized medical patients, and a meta-analysis reporting the rate of VTE among patient groups at varying levels of risk for VTE does not exist.

The investigators will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to develop this systematic review and meta-analysis.

The investigators will perform a systematic review of the literature and report VTE risk assessment models that have been derived and validated among hospitalized medical patients. The investigators will perform a meta-analysis of studies that report a rate of VTE among patients identified as being at elevated risk for VTE and those that are not. The investigators pre-specify that they are going to analyze the prospective and retrospective studies captured by the literature search in two ways. First, the investigators will perform an analysis that groups both prospective and retrospective studies together. The investigators will also perform an analysis that separates out the prospective and retrospective studies. While this will decrease our sample size (and thus power), this approach may allow us to identify any bias or confounding present due to the retrospective study design and then control for it. Notably confirmation that both retrospective and prospective studies identified the same findings would enhance the clinical usefulness of our findings.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84157
        • Intermountain Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult hospitalized medical patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Hospitalized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgical patients
  • Pregnant patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hospitalized Medical Patients
All hospitalized medical adult patients
Use of a method to assess a patient's risk of VTE, and then appropriate prophylaxis for the assigned level of risk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VTE
Time Frame: 28 to 180 days
Objectively confirmed within individual studies
28 to 180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Scott C Woller, MD, Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

October 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical Trials on Application of VTE Risk Assessment

Subscribe