An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin Mesylate in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma (Study E7389-J081-217)

March 9, 2016 updated by: Eisai Co., Ltd.

An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin Mesylate in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate in subjects with soft tissue sarcoma who received at least one standard chemotherapy (an anthracycline or an ifosfamide monotherapy or a combination therapy).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Fukuoka, Japan
      • Okayama, Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
    • Chiba
      • Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
    • Hokkaido
      • Hidaka, Hokkaido, Japan
      • Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
    • Mie
      • Tsu, Mie, Japan
    • Osaka
      • Suita, Osaka, Japan
    • Tokyo
      • Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of high or intermediate grade
  • Documented evidence of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy
  • Within 6 months from the radiographic evidence of disease progression by RECIST criteria in the last chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
  • Presence of measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
  • Subjects who received at least one standard chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (an anthracycline or an ifosfamide monotherapy, or a combination therapy)
  • Subjects aged ≥ 20 years at the time of informed consent
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1
  • Adequate organ function
  • Voluntary agreement to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • A history of malignancies or recurrence within 5 years after the remission
  • Significant cardiovascular impairment
  • Any serious concomitant illness or infection requiring treatment.
  • Hypersensitivity to either halichondrin B or halichondrin B chemical derivatives or both.
  • Subjects who have previously participated in a study with eribulin (whether treated with eribulin or not).
  • Any medical or other condition which, in the opinion of the principal investigator, will preclude participation in a clinical trial.
  • Subjects who have received any anti-cancer therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, cytotoxic, hormonal, biological (including humanized antibodies) and targeted agents within 21 days, or any investigational agent within 30 days, prior to the first dose of study drug.
  • Subjects who have not recovered from toxicities as a result of prior anti-cancer therapy to ≤ Grade 1, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), except for peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2 and alopecia.
  • Subjects with known cerebral metastases with clinical symptoms or requiring treatment.
  • Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy > CTCAE Grade 2.
  • Female subjects must not be pregnant with a negative by the pregnancy test at Screening, or breastfeeding.
  • Subjects participating in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2
Administration of eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m^2 as an IV bolus infusion over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days.
Other Names:
  • E7389

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Rate at 12 Weeks (PFR12wks)
Time Frame: Week 12
The PFR at 12 weeks was the percentage of participants with progression-free survival (success) measured as a binary variable based on the tumor response assessed at Week 12 after the start of study treatment. Participants were considered a success if one radiological evaluation performed at least Week 12 after start of therapy indicated stable disease (SD), or complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1); all other cases were considered as failures (including disease progression or death before the Week 12 evaluation, or had unknown disease status at Week 12). If new anticancer treatments were started before the Week 12 evaluation, participants were considered failures. A 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the exact method of binomial distribution.
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (Day 1) to progressive disease (PD) or death, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014) up to 3 years
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the first documented date of event (disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first). PFS was assessed every six weeks (until disease progression was confirmed, or sooner, if clinically indicated) and was based on Investigator and Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessments according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression was measured using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on targeted tumors and defined as at least a 20% relative increase and 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study), recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. A 95% CI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula. A generalized Brookmeyer and Crowley method was used to construct a log-log-transformed 95% CI.
Cycle 1 (Day 1) to progressive disease (PD) or death, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014) up to 3 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (Day 1) to death, or date of study cutoff, (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the date of death from any cause. Participants were followed for survival every twelve weeks after PD. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants were censored either at the date that the participant was last known alive or the date of study cutoff, whichever came earlier. Participants censored before database cutoff included those who were lost to follow up and who withdrew consent. A 95% CI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula. A generalized Brookmeyer and Crowley method is used to construct a log-log-transformed 95% CI.
Cycle 1 (Day 1) to death, or date of study cutoff, (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Date of CR or PR to the date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had a best overall rate (BOR) of CR or PR. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. The BOR of CR and PR in this study required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of response at least four weeks (28 days) later. CR and PR were determined by the Investigator and IRC using RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT scans. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. A 95% CI was calculated using exact method of binomial distribution.
Date of CR or PR to the date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Date of CR, PR, or SD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had BOR of CR + PR + SD. BOR of SD must have manifested at least five weeks (35 days) after the first dose of study treatment. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter since the treatment started. A 95% CI was calculated using exact method of binomial distribution.
Date of CR, PR, or SD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: First dose of study treatment to the date of CR, PR, or dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR + PR + dSD (duration of SD greater than or equal to 11 weeks [77 days] after the first dose of study treatment). Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. For participants whose BOR was SD, the duration of SD was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (i.e., same definition of PFS). If the dSD was censored at a time less than 11 weeks, the participant was considered as not having a clinical benefit. A 95% CI was calculated using exact method of binomial distribution.
First dose of study treatment to the date of CR, PR, or dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Durable Stable Disease (SD) Rate (dSDR)
Time Frame: Date of dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (24 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Durable stable disease rate was defined as the percentage of participants who manifested durable stable disease (the duration of stable disease for greater than or equal to eleven weeks) and was estimated based on the tumor response assessments performed according to RECIST v1.1. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. A 2-sided 95% CI was calculated using the exact method of binomial distribution.
Date of dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (24 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time Frame: Date of CR, PR, SD to PD or death of any cause, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), or up to 3 years
The best overall response categories (CR, PR, SD [including non-CR/non-PD], PD, not evaluable [NE], and unknown [UNK]) were derived based on time point tumor responses during the study as assessed by the IRC as well as the investigator. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. BOR of SD must have occurred at least 35 days (at least 5 weeks) after the first dose of study drug. If a participant had a BOR of non-CR/non-PD, the participant's BOR was grouped with the SD category.
Date of CR, PR, SD to PD or death of any cause, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), or up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hiroshi Obaishi, Eisai Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E7389-J081-217

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on eribulin mesylate

Subscribe