Evaluation of the New Orleans Intervention for Infant Mental Health (BEST?)

June 3, 2024 updated by: Helen Minnis, University of Glasgow

Evaluation of the New Orleans Intervention for Infant Mental Health in Glasgow

Early intervention for maltreated infants can improve mental and physical health throughout life and benefit families and society as a whole. The New Orleans Model provides intensive assessment and treatment for families of maltreated preschool children in foster care, with recommendations to court about adoption, or permanent return to birth families. The New Orleans Model appears to have led to better informed decisions about permanent placement and to better child mental health in Louisiana. The investigators propose an exploratory randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of the New Orleans Model in the Scottish context, informing the development of an economic model to explore the potential cost-effectiveness. Families with a maltreated child under 5 years of age will be offered the New Orleans Model or "case management" i.e. quality assured services as usual, using random allocation. The investigators will measure outcome using well validated measures of parent-child interaction, cognition and attachment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The first 5 months of this trial - from December 2011 to April 2012 - is an internal pilot or "implementation period". During this time we have fewer research staff, both services will just have started and we will only be collecting selected outcome measures. These will be the Principle Outcome Measure, the Infant-Toddler Social-Emotional Assessment (ITSEA), plus the Disturbance of Attachment Interview (DAI) and Parent-Infant Global Assessment of Functioning (PIR-GAS). We hope to include data from implementation period in our trial analysis, but if results are very different due to services "bedding in", we may not do so

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

227

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G3 8SJ
        • University of Glasgow

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All maltreated children placed in foster care, aged between 6 and 60 months, whose parents give informed opt-in consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with profound learning disability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Glasgow Infant and Family Team (GIFT)
A service developed by Charles Zeanah and colleagues in New Orleans, that aims to improve the mental health of maltreated infants.
An attachment-based assessment, then a tailored intervention aimed at maximising the chances of a maltreated child returning to the birth family.
Other Names:
  • New Orleans Intervention
Active Comparator: Family Assessment & Contact Service
A social-work based service that aims to assess maltreated children and make recommendations about their future care.
A social work assessment of family functioning that makes recommendations regarding future placement of a maltreated child.
Other Names:
  • Case Management (Lieberman, 2005).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in score on the Infant-Toddler Social-emotional Assessment (ITSEA)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 1 year follow-up
The ITSEA is a well validated parent/carer-completed questionnaire covering a wide range of social and emotional behaviours in infants and preschool children. It has been shown to be sensitive to change in previous intervention research with maltreated children with medium to large effect sizes and has good longitudinal stability.
Baseline and at 1 year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Parent Evaluation of Development (PEDS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year follow up
A brief parent-report measure of infant language and other milestones
Baseline and 1 year follow up
The Disturbances of Attachment Interview (DAI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year follow up
A measure of attachment disorder.
Baseline and 1 year follow up
The Parent-Infant Global Assessment of Functioning (PIR-GAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year follow up
A video-based assessment of global relationship functioning
Baseline and 1 year follow up
This is My Baby (TIMB)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year Follow up
A measure of the degree of committment to the child by the caregiver
Baseline and 1 year Follow up
The Development and Wellbeing Assessment (DAWBA)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year follow up for children over 2 years.
A diagnostic intrument generating DSM and ICD psychiatric diagnoses.
Baseline and 1 year follow up for children over 2 years.
Cognitive assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year follow up
This will be either the Bayley's or the WPPSI depending on the age of the child.
Baseline and 1 year follow up
The Use of Services Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year follow up
This carer-report questionnaire generates service use and costs data for health economic analysis
Baseline and 1 year follow up
The Strange Situation Procedure (SSP)
Time Frame: 1 year follow up only
This is the gold standard measure for infant/toddler attachment patterns.
1 year follow up only

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen Minnis, MBChB, PhD, University of Glasgow
  • Study Chair: Niel Campbell, MBChB, PhD, University of Aberdeen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maltreated Infants

Clinical Trials on GIFT

Subscribe