Telephone-delivered Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Risky Sexual Behavior in HIV-positive Late Middle-age and Older Adults (MI)

December 22, 2011 updated by: Travis Lovejoy, Ph.D., M.P.H., Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine

Phase I Clinical Trial of Telephone-delivered Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Sexual Risk Behavior in HIV-positive Persons 45-plus Years of Age

The number of late middle-age and older adults living with HIV/AIDS in the U.S. continues to rise due largely to

  • better clinical care and the improved efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy that has extended the lives of many HIV-positive persons
  • an increase in the number of new HIV infections in older persons. This study tested the efficacy of 1- and 4-session telephone-administered behavioral sexual risk reduction interventions for HIV-positive adults 45-plus years of age who engage in risky sexual behaviors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The number of late middle-age and older adults living with HIV/AIDS in the U.S. continues to rise. In fact, it is estimated that by 2014, 50% of all HIV-positive persons will be 50 years of age or older, due largely to a) better clinical care and the improved efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy that has extended the lives of many HIV-positive persons and b) an increase in the number of new HIV infections in older persons. Despite escalating HIV incidence and prevalence rates in older adults, and the fact that an estimated 13% to 30% of older persons living with HIV/AIDS continue to engage in risky sexual practices, few secondary risk reduction interventions have been contextualized to meet the unique needs of sexually active HIV-infected older adults. These unique needs include biological and libidinal changes associated with aging such as erectile dysfunction and the increased use of erectile dysfunction medications in older men, sexual partnerships with younger persons, survivor guilt over outliving romantic partners, and the impact of co-morbid chronic illnesses (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis, cancer, hepatitis C) and associated medication and/or treatment side effects on perceptions of physical attractiveness.

Many HIV-positive older adults who would benefit from face-to-face sexual risk reduction interventions live with serious comorbid health conditions that complicate travel to medical and social service appointments, have significant confidentiality concerns, and are geographically isolated from traditional risk reduction resources. As such, face-to-face interventions are an unrealistic intervention modality for many members of this group. However, risk reduction interventions delivered using distance technologies, such as regular and cellular telephones, can reach many older adults living with HIV/AIDS.

In response to the lack of age-appropriate risk reduction interventions for HIV-infected older adults who engage in high-risk sex, and the potential of telephone technology to deliver cost-effective risk reduction interventions to this group, this study tested the efficacy of 1- and 4-session telephone-administered behavioral sexual risk reduction interventions for HIV-positive adults 45-plus years of age who engage in risky sexual behaviors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Athens, Ohio, United States, 45701
        • Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-positive
  • English-speaking
  • Access to a land line or cellular telephone
  • Unprotected anal or vaginal intercourse in the past 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sexual partner of study participant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care Control
Participants will receive standard sexual risk reduction services available to them through medical and community-based organizations
Experimental: 1-session motivational interviewing
Participants will receive a single session of motivational interviewing delivered over the telephone
Participants will receive a single session of telephone-delivered motivational interviewing to reduce sexual risk behavior.
Experimental: 4-session motivational interviewing
Participants will receive four weekly sessions of motivational interviewing delivered over the telephone.
Participants will receive four weekly sessions of telephone-delivered motivational interviewing to reduce sexual risk behavior.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in self-reported number of non-condom-protected anal and vaginal sex acts in the past 3 months from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 3-month follow-up
baseline, 3-month follow-up
Change in self-reported number of non-condom-protected anal and vaginal sex acts in the past 3 months from baseline to 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, 6-month follow-up
baseline, 6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of participants reporting 100% condom use for anal and vaginal sex in the past 3 months
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Travis I Lovejoy, Ph.D., M.P.H., Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 26, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2011

Last Verified

December 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unsafe Sex

Clinical Trials on 1-session of telephone-administered motivational interviewing

3
Subscribe