Methadone Maintenance and HIV Prevention: A Window of Opportunity in China (MMT1)

September 28, 2023 updated by: University of California, Los Angeles

Methadone Maintenance and HIV Prevention: A Window of Opportunity in China Version

This study is an intervention pilot that integrates the current methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) program in China with psychosocial and behavioral components in order to address the critical link between drug use and HIV/AIDS.

The intervention pilot proceeds in two phases in Sichuan, China. In Phase 1, we developed the intervention manuals and supporting materials, and finalized assessment measures and implementation procedures. In Phase 2, we conducted an intervention pilot across 6 MMT clinics involving 41 service providers and 179 clients, and followed up at three, six, and nine months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The implementation of the MMT program in China is one of the most significant measures ever taken by the Chinese government to address drug use and HIV prevention challenges. In 2004, China launched a series of MMT programs at eight pilot clinics in five provinces. By December 2007, 503 MMT clinics had been established nationwide across 23 provinces. Several studies have found that positive outcomes in drug use, criminality, and employment were associated with participation in MMT. However, special challenges are facing the current MMT programs are facing: 1) clients' drop-out rates are high; and 2) providers at MMT clinics do not have sufficient training, and some of them hesitate to serve the population. We have recognized the urgent need and conducted the study to address these challenges.

The intervention pilot proceeds in two phases in Sichuan, China. In Phase 1, we developed the intervention manuals and supporting materials, and finalized assessment measures and implementation procedures. In Phase 2, we conducted an intervention pilot across 6 MMT clinics involving 41 service providers and 179 clients, and followed up at three, six, and nine months.

The specific aims of the proposed study are:

Specific Aim 1: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the MMT PLUS intervention with process evaluation and participant feedback.

Specific Aim 2: To examine primary outcomes on whether service providers in the intervention group, compared to providers in the standard care, will demonstrate improved adherence to MMT protocol, decrease in prejudicial attitudes, increase in comfort working with MMT clients, increase in motivating clients and making personalized risk management plan.

Specific Aim 3: To explore secondary outcomes on whether MMT clients in the intervention group, compared to clients in the standard care, will report increased motivation to change, improved psychological and physical health, increased positive support network, and reduced HIV risk behavior.

Specific Aim 4: To investigate exploratory outcomes on whether MMT clients in the intervention group, compared to clients in the standard care, will report improved MMT treatment retention and decreased drug use.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • Sichuan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Service providers

  • Age 18 and above
  • Currently working in MMT clinic
  • Informed consent

MMT clients

  • Age 18 or over
  • Currently enrolled in MMT
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Service providers

  • Anyone who does not meet the inclusion criteria.

MMT clients:

  • Psychosis, neurological damage, as judged by an interviewer in consultation with a clinical supervisor inability to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Intervention group service providers received four training sessions (plus reunion sessions) on MMT protocol, reducing stigma and its impact, maintaining positive interactions with clients, and motivational interviewing skills. The participating providers are required to conduct three individual motivational sessions with their clients upon completion of the intervention sessions.
Intervention group service providers received four training sessions (plus reunion sessions) on MMT protocol, reducing stigma and its impact, maintaining positive interactions with clients, and motivational interviewing skills. The participating providers are required to conduct three individual motivational sessions with their clients upon completion of the intervention sessions.
No Intervention: Standard care
No additional training or service is provided for standard care group service providers or clients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Service providers' MMT knowledge
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service provider's prejudical attitude towards drug users
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Provide-client interaction
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Provider's perceived stigma due to work with drug using population
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service provider's perceived risk at work
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service provider's perceived institutional support
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service provider's job satisfaction
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Client's drug using behavior
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Client's physical health
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
MMT client's mental health
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Client's perceived stigma from MMT clients
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Client's readiness to change
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Client's drug avoidance self-efficacy
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Client's social support
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Li Li, PhD, NPI-Center for Community Health, UCLA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

February 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on MMT CARE

Subscribe