Cocktail Sedation Containing Propofol Versus Conventional Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

February 27, 2012 updated by: Rapat Pittayanon, MD, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Cocktail Sedation Containing Propofol Versus Conventional Sedation for ERCP: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) practically requires moderate to deep sedation by a combination of benzodiazepine and opioid. Propofol as a sole agent may cause oversedation. A combination (cocktail) of infused propofol, meperidine, and midazolam can reduce the dosage of propofol and may result in a lower risk of oversedation. The investigators prospectively compare the efficacy, recovery time, patient satisfactory, and side effects between cocktail and conventional sedations in patients undergoing ERCP.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

ERCP patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups; the cocktail group and the controls. For induction, a combination of 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were injected in both groups. In the cocktail group, a bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg was administered and continuously infused. In the controls, 25 mg of meperidine or 2.5 mg/kg of midazolam were titrated to maintain the level of sedation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

205

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bangkok
      • Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • Gastroenterology Unit, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for ERCP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical classification IV - V
  • History of sulfite, egg or soy bean allergy
  • Emergency need for ERCP
  • Informed consent could not be obtained

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional group
For induction, 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered. To maintain conscious level of patient at moderate or deep level, 25 mg of meperidine and/or 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered as necessary.
For induction, 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered in both groups. In the cocktail group, one milligram per kilogram body weight of 1% propofol emulsion (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Irvine, CA) was slowly infused by an automated pump (Terufusion syringe pump TE-331, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). To maintain conscious level of patient in the conventional group to be at moderate or deep level, 25 mg of meperidine and/or 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered as necessary, whereas patients in the cocktail group were continuously administered with 1% propofol at the rate of 1 mg/kg/hr. An additional 0.5 mg/kg bolus was administered as needed to achieve the designed conscious level.
Other Names:
  • diprivan
Experimental: cocktail group
For induction, 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered. To maintain conscious level of patient at moderate or deep level, 1% propofol at the rate of 1 mg/kg/hr was administered. An additional 0.5 mg/kg bolus was administered as needed to achieve the designed conscious level.
For induction, 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered in both groups. In the cocktail group, one milligram per kilogram body weight of 1% propofol emulsion (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Irvine, CA) was slowly infused by an automated pump (Terufusion syringe pump TE-331, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). To maintain conscious level of patient in the conventional group to be at moderate or deep level, 25 mg of meperidine and/or 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered as necessary, whereas patients in the cocktail group were continuously administered with 1% propofol at the rate of 1 mg/kg/hr. An additional 0.5 mg/kg bolus was administered as needed to achieve the designed conscious level.
Other Names:
  • diprivan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
procedure related time
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
(1) induction time (the time from sedation to scope intubation), (2) procedural time (the time from scope intubation to scope withdrawal), and (3) recovery time (the time from scope withdrawal to full recovery (modified Aldrete score of 10)). The induction time and procedural time were recorded by the nurse in the endoscopy unit.
participants will be followed for the duration of procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiopulmonary complications
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
(1) hypotension (systolic blood pressure drops to less than 90 mmHg or decreases more than 25% from the baseline), (2) bradycardia (heart rate <40 beats/min), (3) desaturation (oxygen saturation <90% for >10 seconds), and (4) apnea (cessation of respiratory activity for over 10 seconds under visual observation). If the oxygen saturation dropped to <85% for more than 30 seconds despite oxygen supplementation or apnea occurred, the procedure would be interrupted and reversal medications would be given to the patient.
participants will be followed for the duration of procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rungsun Rerknimitr, MD, Gastroenterology Unit, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 28, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disorders of Gallbladder, Biliary Tract and Pancreas

Clinical Trials on propofol

Subscribe