Study of a Melanoma Vaccine in Stage IIb, IIc, and III Melanoma Patients (MAVIS)

October 13, 2025 updated by: Polynoma LLC

A Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Adaptive Phase 3 Trial of POL-103A Polyvalent Melanoma Vaccine in Post-resection Melanoma Patients With a High Risk of Recurrence

The purpose of this study is to determine how safe and how well POL-103A works in preventing the relapse of melanoma after patients who have undergone surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

504

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Québec, Canada, G1R2J6
        • CHU de Quebec-L'Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8R6V5
        • BCCA Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
    • Ontario
      • Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1G2B9
        • Durham Regional Cancer Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology
    • Quebec
      • Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada, J4V 2H1
        • CISSS de la Montérégie - Centre
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A3J1
        • Royal Victoria Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
        • Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85719
        • University of Arizona Cancer Center
    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States, 72703
        • Highlands Oncology Group
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Beverly Hills Cancer Center
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope National Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90025
        • The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Hematology & Oncology Clinic
      • Oxnard, California, United States, 93030
        • Ventura County Hematology Oncology Specialists
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • Sutter Cancer center
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94117
        • St. Mary's Hospital & Medical Center Department of Pathology
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • The Melanoma Center at the Washington Cancer Institute
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32204
        • GenesisCare USA of Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
        • Cancer Specialists of North Florida
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • MD Anderson Cancer Center-Orlando
      • Ormond Beach, Florida, United States, 32174
        • Ameriderm Research
    • Illinois
      • Niles, Illinois, United States, 60714
        • Advocate Medical Group
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62794
        • Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • Investigative Clinical Research of Indiana
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40503
        • Baptist Health Lexington
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40509
        • Central Kentucky Research Associates
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University of Louisville
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21237
        • Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute @ Franklin Square
    • Michigan
      • Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48075
        • Ascension Providence Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Institute
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic Rochester
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64114
        • Center For Pharmaceutical Research
      • Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States, 64506
        • MediSearch Clinical Trials
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • St. Louis University Hospital
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Norris Cotton Cancer Center / Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • John Theurer Cancer Center/ Hackensack Medical Center
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Rutgers Cancer Institute of NJ
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • East Carolina University
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45431
        • Premier Health Partners Clinical Trials Research Alliance
      • Independence, Ohio, United States, 44131
        • Independence Family Health Center (Cleveland Clinic)
      • Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States, 44124
        • Hillcrest Hospital (Cleveland Clinic)
    • Oregon
      • Bend, Oregon, United States, 97701
        • Bend Memorial Clinic
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science University
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
        • Providence Portland Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson Medical Oncology
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19611
        • McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
        • The West Clinic P.C. d/b/a West Cancer Center
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37920
        • University of Tennessee Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Cancer Solutions
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Baylor Research Institute
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77004
        • Center For Clinical Studies
    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Intermountain Medical Center
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112-5550
        • The Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Care
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University Of Virginia Hospital
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Inova Schar Cancer Center
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Medical Center
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98405
        • MultiCare Institute for Research & Innovation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed Stage IIb, IIc, III melanoma
  • Surgical resection within 90 days of first dosing
  • Persons with positive sentinel nodes must have a complete lymphadenectomy
  • ECOG performance status 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior melanoma treatment other than surgery or regional irradiation
  • Use of biologic response modifiers within 60 days of first dosing
  • Subjects with history of other malignancy within past 5 years (with exceptions)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: POL-103A without API
Placebo is administered intradermally, divided into 4 injections (0.2 mL each injection) into the volar surface of forearms and into the anterior upper thighs
Experimental: POL-103A
POL-103A is administered intradermally, divided into 4 injections (0.2 mL each injection) into the volar surface of forearms and into the anterior upper thighs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part B1: Recurrence Free Survival (RFS)
Time Frame: 432 events or 8 years and 10 months
This is an event driven trial. Recurrence-free survival time (RFS) is computed from the earliest of the date of recurrence or death or, if without recurrence or death, the date last assessed for recurrence without diagnosis of recurrence (censored). The date of recurrence is specified as the first date a recurrence is suspected, which is later confirmed by biopsy.
432 events or 8 years and 10 months
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight MW) Range 1 [0,20)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for WM range 1.
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for WM range 1.
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 2 [20,28)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 2
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 2
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 3 [28,36)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 3
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 3
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 4 [36,44)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 4
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 4
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 5 [44,53)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 5
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 5
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 6 [53,62)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 6
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 6
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 7 [62,72)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 7
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 7
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 8 [72,83)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 8
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 8
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 9 [83,94)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 9
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 9
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 10 [94,105)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 10
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 10
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 11 [105,118)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 11
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 11
Part A:To Evaluate the Biological Activity of Seviprotimut-L in Patients With Molecular Weight (MW) Range 12 [118,Inf)
Time Frame: Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 12
For Part A, immunogenicity of the vaccine was based on anti-melanoma IgG/IgM antibody response at week 10 compared to week 0. A positive result by Western Blot was considered an immunogenic response to study treatment. The response for each participant was calculated based on the average percent change in intensity across these Bins. The definition of response in each participant was the average percent change: > 0% (meaning any change), or > 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. The bands having data in each Bin is the unit of analysis in each Bin and in all cases corresponds to the number of participants having bands in that Bin. No participant had multiple bands in a single Bin.
Serum was collected for Western blot testing and analysis on Day 0 (baseline) and at Week 10 for MW range 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part B1: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Overall survival (OS) was measured from randomization until death from any cause, assessed up to 76 months.
Overall survival (OS) analyses were based on the ITT analysis set; OS was defined as the duration from randomization until death. If the patient was alive, OS was censored at the earliest date the participant was known to be alive or the date of data cutoff.
Overall survival (OS) was measured from randomization until death from any cause, assessed up to 76 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Craig Slingluff, M.D., University Of Virginia Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

March 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melanoma

Clinical Trials on POL-103A without API

Subscribe