Effects of Bolus and Continuous Nasogastric Feeding on Small Bowel Water Content and Blood Flow

May 3, 2013 updated by: University of Nottingham

Following surgery some patients are unable to swallow. For those requiring nutritional support a tube is sometimes passed through the nose into the stomach to provide feeding. Traditionally this type of feeding is given slowly over the course of the day. However, it is thought that this mode of feeding might increase the amount of fluid entering the bowel contributing to symptoms of diarrhoea. An alternative strategy of feeding, given in larger volumes in a shorter space of time resembles normal feeding patterns and may reduce the amount of water entering the bowel.

In this study we want to use a non invasive medical imaging technique called "magnetic resonance imaging" (or MRI) to look at the volume of bowel water following these two feeding strategies in 12 healthy volunteers.

Each volunteer will have a tube inserted into the stomach via the nose and undergo the two feeding strategies at least 7 days apart. We will take repeated images using the MRI scanner to assess the bowel response and some samples of blood are required for analysis of blood sugar.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Background. Nutritional support is often required for undernourished patients who are unable to meet daily nutritional requirements. This is often due to lack of consciousness or problems with swallowing, Nasogastric (NG) feeding is often employed to provide active enteric nutritional support. The current approach for delivering this support usually involves pump-assisted continuous feeding spread throughout the course of a day. However, this practice is far from physiological and may promote excessive secretion of fluid into the small bowel, contributing to gastrointestinal symptoms frequently experienced by NG fed patients. Rarely, continuous enteral tube feeding has been associated with small bowel ischaemia or necrosis, although this observation has almost always been made in the critically ill. Bolus feeds given in larger volumes over shorter time periods replicate the pattern of normal feeding. Consequently gastric emptying using this method is slowed and may, therefore, reduce the metabolic demand on the small intestine and prevent excessive accumulation of small bowel fluid.
  2. Aims. This study aims to investigate the influence of bolus or continuous NG feeding on small bowel fluid content and superior mesenteric blood flow. Our hypothesis is that bolus NG feeding results in lower small bowel fluid secretion and a reduction in superior mesenteric artery blood flow in comparison to individuals who are bolus NG fed.
  3. Experimental protocol and methods.

    This is a single-centre, cross-over study involving 12 healthy volunteers. Two studies will be undertaken for each volunteer approximately 7 days apart:

    • Tube bolus (TB): feed administered via the NG tube over 5 min.
    • Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): feed pump delivered via the NG tube over 4 h.

    The sequence of treatment allocations will be concealed to assessors until all interventions, data collection, and statistical analysis has been completed.

    Subjects will be asked to arrive at 8:30 a.m. at the Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance 1.5T, University of Nottingham, having abstained from alcohol, caffeine-containing drinks, and any medication for at least 24 h prior to the study, as well as having fasted overnight. An 80 cm 8FR Freka (Fresenius Kabi, Runcorn, UK) fine bore nasogastric (NG) tube will be inserted into the stomach via the nose as well as a cannula in the ante cubital fossa for blood sampling. The position of the NG tube will be verified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Once the tube is sited, the volunteer will be asked to sit for 5 min in order to allow the tubes to settle and the body adapt to their presence. Following NG intubation subjects will undergo baseline MRI scanning and blood sampling for glucose, insulin and PYY. Feeding will commence at time 0. Scanning and blood tests will proceed at 30 min intervals for a total of 4 h. The feed used in all studies will be 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink (Nestle Nutrition, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A), which is typical of a standard oral supplement.

    In the TB study arm the supplement will be administered through the NG tube via syringes over 5 min; and in the TD study the feed will be administered using a pump at a rate of 100 ml/h for 4 h.

  4. Measurable end points/statistical power of the study. Primary endpoint: Small bowel water content (SBWC). Secondary endpoints: Superior mesenteric artery blood flow, gastric content emptying time, plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin and peptide YY (PYY). Previous work using mannitol and glucose indicates that mean (SD) SBWC at 40 minutes postprandially after ingesting 300ml glucose was 47 (SD 15) and using n=10 we calculate we can detect a difference of 17 ml (36%) between interventions with 90% power. We plan to recruit 12 to allow for dropouts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG7 2RD
        • Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy
  • Male
  • Able to undergo safe magnetic resonance scanning

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Chronic medical conditions
  • Regular medication
  • Unable to undergo safe magentic resonance scanning
  • Previous abdominal surgery
  • Smoking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: NG bolus feeding over 5 min
Tube bolus (TB): feed administered via syringe through NG tube over 5 min.
Tube bolus (TB): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., administered via the NG tube over 5 min.
Other Names:
  • Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A
Placebo Comparator: Continuous NG feeding over 4 h
Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): feed pump delivered via the NG tube over 4 h.
Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., delivered via feeding pump through the NG tube over 4 h.
Other Names:
  • Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Small bowel water volume (ml)
Time Frame: 0-240 min
Small bowel water content assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
0-240 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gastric emptying
Time Frame: 0-240 min
Gastric volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
0-240 min
Superior mesenteric artery blood flow
Time Frame: 0-240 min
Superior mesenteric artery blood flow and velocity assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
0-240 min
Peptide YY
Time Frame: 0-240 min
Serum concentration of peptide YY
0-240 min
Insulin
Time Frame: 0-240 min
Serum concentration of insulin
0-240 min
Glucose
Time Frame: 0-240 min
Serum concentration of glucose
0-240 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abeed H Chowdhury, BSc MRCS, University of Nottingham
  • Study Chair: Tim Bowling, MD FRCP, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H062011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Enteral Feeding

Clinical Trials on NG bolus feeding over 5 min

Subscribe