Tri-weekly Cisplatin Based Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (TACO)

February 25, 2019 updated by: Sang-Young Ryu, Korea Cancer Center Hospital

Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial of Weekly Versus Tri-weekly Cisplatin Based Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Current standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). Although recently reported meta-analysis studies also demonstrated improved local control rates and survival with cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to radiation therapy (RT), the optimal cisplatin dose and dosing schedule are still undetermined.

In light of the results of the previous clinical trial, weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 considered to be a standard regiment in cisplatin doses and dosing schedules. However, our randomized phase II trial showed that tri-weekly cisplatin 75mg/m2 has lower toxicities and a better outcome in locally advanced cervical cancer.

In this randomized phase III trial, the investigators investigate that there may be a survival difference between weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 administration concurrent to RT in cervical cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common gynecologic cancers worldwide. The prognosis of cervical cancer is favorable, with around 80-90% 5-year survival rate in early stage disease. However, advanced disease carries a poor prognosis. Current standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer, which is not eligible for surgical treatment, is cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). Based on the results of five randomized clinical trials, which consistently showed improved survival in patients treated with cisplatin-based CRT, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the United States announced that 'Strong consideration should be given to the incorporation of concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy with RT in women who require radiation therapy for treatment of cervical cancer' in 1999.

Although recently reported meta-analysis studies also demonstrated improved local control rates and survival with cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to radiation therapy (RT), the optimal cisplatin dose and dosing schedule are still undetermined. Among the previous five randomized clinical trials, two trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) used weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 while the other three trials used tri-weekly cisplatin at a dosage range of 50 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Despite the diversity in cisplatin dose and dosing schedules, weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT is widely accepted as the standard regimen of CRT because of its convenience, equal effectiveness, and favorable toxicity in comparison to other 5-FU combined regimens.

However, as a result of the GOG 165 study, which was closed prematurely because an interim analysis found that patients in the 5-FU treatment group were not likely to achieve a better outcome, the role of 5-FU (previously popularly included in clinical trials) as a radiosensitizer became subject to debate. Furthermore, a clinical trial performed by the NCI in Canada comparing pelvic RT alone with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT failed to show improvement of progression free and 5-year survival. While the authors suggested several possible reasons for why their study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 chemotherapy, other investigators have tried to find another optimal dose and dosing schedule for cisplatin administration.

In light of the results of the previous clinical trial that indicated 5-FU may not be an active radiosensitizer, weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 remain the most popular cisplatin doses and dosing schedules. However, despite the possible advantages of tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2, which offer an increased peak concentration of cisplatin and cisplatin administration during brachytherapy, no clinical trials thus far have directly compared weekly and tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to RT.

Recently the investigators reported a randomized phase II trial to compare the compliance to and toxicity of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 administration concurrent to RT. The study showed that tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 concurrent to RT is feasible and increase 5-year survival rate significantly compared to weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (66.5% in the weekly arm, 88.7% in the tri-weekly arm; HR=0.375, 95% CI: 0.154-0.914, p= .03).

Therefore, in this randomized phase III trial, The investigators intend to confirm the survival difference between weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 administration concurrent to RT in this patient population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

374

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: SANG YOUNG RYU, M.D.
  • Phone Number: 82-2-970-1227
  • Email: ryu@kcch.re.kr

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Gui Hao Ke
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Dongnam Inst.of Radiological/Medical Science
        • Contact:
          • Sang-IL Park
      • Cheonan, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Seob Jeon
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Dongsan Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Chi-Heum Cho
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Asan Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Joo-Hyun Nam
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Hak Jae Kim
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Gangnam Severance Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jae-Hoon Kim
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Seung Cheol Kim
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Korea University Guro Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jin Hwa Hong
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Gachon University Gil Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Gwang Beom Lee
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
          • SANG YOUNG RYU, M.D.
          • Phone Number: 82-2-970-1227
          • Email: ryu@kcch.re.kr
        • Principal Investigator:
          • SANG YOUNG RYU, M.D.
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Kyungpook National University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Sun-joo Lee
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Severance Hospital/Sinchon Severance Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Young Tae Kim
      • Bankok, Thailand
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • SARIKAPAN WILAILAK, M.D.
      • Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
        • Recruiting
        • Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Thinh Dang huy Quoc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible patients will have pathologically proven primary locally advanced cervical cancer with squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma histology suitable for primary treatment with chemoradiation with curative intent
  • FIGO 2008 stage 1B2, 2B, 3B, 4A
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Patients must have adequate Hematologic function(ANC ≥ 1,500/mcl and platelets ≥ 100,000/mcl), Renal function(serum creatinine ≤ ULN or calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min), Hepatic function(serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN and AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN and ALT≤ 2.5 x ULN)
  • Patients must have signed an approved informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cervix cancer who have received any previous radiation or chemotherapy
  • Patients assessed at presentation as requiring interstitial brachytherapy treatment
  • FIGO stage 3A disease
  • Para-aortic nodal involvement above the level of the common iliac nodes or L3/L4 (if biopsy proven, PET positive or > 15mm short axis diameter on CT)
  • Patients with bilateral hydronephrosis unless at least one side has been stented and renal function fulfils the required inclusion criteria
  • Previous chemotherapy for this tumor
  • Evidence of distant metastases
  • Prior diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating
  • History of other invasive malignancies, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer and in situ melanoma, who had (or have) any evidence of the other cancer present within the last 5 years
  • Serious illness or medical condition that precludes the safe administration of the trial treatment including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A: Weekly cisplatin with RT
Weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2 six cycles concurrent to radiation therapy

Cisplatin 40mg/m2 IV Weekly For 6 Cycles.(The 6th cycle of cisplatin may be omitted if external beam radiation therapy has been completed) Cisplatin may be diluted and administered per established institutional guidelines. For general suggestion, 40 mg/ m2 of cisplatin may be diluted in 250 ml 0.9% sodium chloride and administered over one or two hours.

Cisplatin will be given on the first day of external RT (Day 1), preferably, and must be given prior to radiation treatment on that day

External beam RT will be followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. The total elapsed time for completion of external beam to the whole pelvis, intracavitary BT, and parametrial / nodal RT shall not exceed eight weeks (56 days)

Other Names:
  • Cisplatin
Experimental: B: Tri-weekly cisplatin with RT
Tri-weekly cisplatin 75mg/m2 three cycles concurrent to radiation therapy

Tri-weekly cisplatin 75mg/m2 three cycles concurrent to radiation therapy

Cisplatin may be diluted and administered per established institutional guidelines. For general suggestion, 75 mg/m2 of cisplatin may be diluted in 500 ml 0.9% sodium chloride and administered over one or two hours (rate of 1 mg of cisplatin per minute).

Cisplatin will be given on the first day of external RT (Day 1), preferably, and must be given prior to radiation treatment on that day.

External beam RT will be followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. The total elapsed time for completion of external beam to the whole pelvis, intracavitary BT, and parametrial / nodal RT shall not exceed eight weeks (56 days)

Other Names:
  • Cisplatin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: From entry into the study to 5 year after treatment or death
Observed length of life from entry into the study to death; or for living patients, the date of last contact regardless of whether or not this contact is on a subsequent protocol.
From entry into the study to 5 year after treatment or death

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 5 year after treatment
The time from randomization to the time of disease progression as determined by the investigator (by clinical, radiological or pathological means) or death from any cause
5 year after treatment
Recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5 year after therapy

Clinical, radiological or histological reoccurrence of disease since study entry.

Site of First Recurrence (e.g. para-aortic or supraclavicular lymph nodes, lung, liver, bone, etc.) will also be documented.

5 year after therapy
Adverse events
Time Frame: 5 years after therapy
Adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigational subject administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An adverse event is any adverse change (developing or worsening) from the patient's pre-treatment condition, including intercurrent illness.
5 years after therapy
Compliance to radiation protocol
Time Frame: 56~ 67 days after treatment start

Variation acceptable:

  • Total treatment completed within 56 days (+20% = 67 days)
  • Total dose received to Point A inclusive of EBRT and BT = 80 - 86.4 Gy +/- 5%

Deviation unacceptable:

  • Total treatment greater than 67 days
  • Total dose received at Point A less than 76 Gy or greater than 90.7 Gy
56~ 67 days after treatment start

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SANG YOUNG SY RYU, M.D., staff
  • Principal Investigator: SARIKAPAN WILAILAK, M.D., Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on Weekly cisplatin with RT

Subscribe