Cytosponge Protocol IRB 11-006429

Cytosponge Protocol

This study is being done to collect data on the potential use of the cytosponge as non-invasive tool in evaluating patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Eosinophilic Esophagitis
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Cytosponge

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 86
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Minnesota
    • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
      • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patients between the ages of 18 and 65 with eosinophilic esophagitis including lactating or pregnant women undergoing clinically indicated endoscopy and esophageal biopsy.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients for whom clinically indicated endoscopy is not safe. Patients who have small caliber esophagus, an esophageal stricture that will not permit passage of the gelatin capsule or are unable to swallow the capsule.
• Vulnerable populations, such as those with diminished mental acuity, will be excluded.
• Patients with known Lidocaine/Acetylcysteine allergies

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cytosponge/ brushing; Subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis undergoing clinically indicated endoscopy and biopsy either for initial diagnosis or for monitoring the activity of their disease will be asked to swallow the cytosponge two hours prior to endoscopy.	Device: Cytosponge; An ingestible gelatin capsule containing a compressed mesh attached to a string. The capsule is swallowed and once in the stomach, the gelatin dissolves and a spherical mesh of 3 cm diameter is released. The mesh is withdrawn through the mouth by the attached string and a cytologic specimen is collected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percent Specificity of the Cytosponge	Percent specificity of Cytosponge ability to detect Eosinophilic Esophagitis when compared to upper endoscopy and biopsies/swab testing. Cytology specimens will be reviewed by one pathologist who will read them blindly without knowledge of the results of the biopsy specimens. To calculate specificity: 100% the number of true negatives divided by the sum of the number of true negatives plus the number of false positives.	Baseline
Percent Sensitivity of the Cytosponge	Percent sensitivity of Cytosponge ability to detect Eosinophilic Esophagitis when compared to upper endoscopy and biopsies/swab testing. Cytology specimens will be reviewed by one pathologist who will read them blindly without knowledge of the results of the biopsy specimens. To calculate sensitivity: 100% the number of true positives divided by the sum of the number of true positives plus the number of false negatives	Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Mayo Clinic
• Collaborators: University of Cambridge

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Katzka DA, Smyrk TC, Alexander JA, Geno DM, Beitia RA, Chang AO, Shaheen NJ, Fitzgerald RC, Dellon ES. Accuracy and Safety of the Cytosponge for Assessing Histologic Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Two-Center Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1538-1544. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.244. Epub 2017 Aug 15. Erratum In: Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 19;:
• Katzka DA, Geno DM, Ravi A, Smyrk TC, Lao-Sirieix P, Miremadi A, Debiram I, O'Donovan M, Kita H, Kephart GM, Kryzer LA, Camilleri M, Alexander JA, Fitzgerald RC. Accuracy, safety, and tolerability of tissue collection by Cytosponge vs endoscopy for evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;13(1):77-83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.026. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Erratum In: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug;13(8):1552. Miramedi, Ahmed [corrected to Miremadi, Ahmed].

Helpful Links

• Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: December 1, 2012
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 7, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): June 7, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 23, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 24, 2012
• First Posted (Estimate): April 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 13, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 10, 2022
• Last Verified: June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Digestive System Diseases; Immune System Diseases; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Hematologic Diseases; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastroenteritis; Hypersensitivity; Esophageal Diseases; Leukocyte Disorders; Eosinophilia; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagitis
• Other Study ID Numbers: 11-006429

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes