Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapy for Supraspinatus Calcifying Tendonitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Different Energy Levels

May 18, 2012 updated by: Francesco Ioppolo, University of Roma La Sapienza
The purpose of this study is to compare two different ranges of energy flux density with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in treatment of supraspinatus calcifying tendonitis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • no visible clinical benefits by previous conservative treatment
  • medium and large calcific deposits, according to Bosworth classification
  • type I and II Gartner deposits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of tiny calcific deposits, according to Bosworth classification
  • type III, according to the Gartner classification
  • age (if less than 18 years old), diabetes, coagulation diseases or anticoagulant therapy, tumors, bone infections, previous shoulder surgery, pregnancy, pace-maker, acute bursitis demonstrated by ultrasound imaging, rheumatoid arthritis or other connective tissue diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
the first group of patients received an energy level of 0.20mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.
an energy level of 0.20mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.
an energy level of 0.10mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.
Active Comparator: 2
The second grouop of patients received 0.10mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.
an energy level of 0.20mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.
an energy level of 0.10mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant Murley Scale
Time Frame: Change in the mean Constant Murley Scale (CMS) scores at 3 and 6 months was the primary endpoint.
Constant-Murley scale is the scoring system used to assess shoulder function in four of the studies being reviewed. It combines physical examination tests with subjective evaluations by the patients and consists of 35 points and 65 points respectively. Its strength is the method of its application, which is quite clearly described, and its being an improvement on pre-existing scales
Change in the mean Constant Murley Scale (CMS) scores at 3 and 6 months was the primary endpoint.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogic Scale
Time Frame: The change in the mean Visual Analogic Scale scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months after the intervention
It is a horizontal line, 10 cm in length with 0 cm labeled "no pain" and 10 cm labeled "worst pain I have ever had". The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state
The change in the mean Visual Analogic Scale scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PTJ-2011-0252.R1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supraspinatus Calcifying Tendonitis

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLK

Subscribe