Exploring Behavioral Interventions to Improve Heart Failure

January 7, 2016 updated by: Laura S. Redwine, PhD, University of California, San Diego

Exploring Tai Chi as a Behavioral Intervention for Heart Failure Patients

The objective of this research is to compare Tai Chi versus Resistance Exercise, Health Education and usual care for changes in cardiac functional capacity measured for ability of the heart to pump by measuring ejection fraction (EF), end systolic and diastolic volumes in heart failure (HF) patients. Also measured will be changes in physical function measured by walking speed and distance in the 6-min walk task, work performed during a bicycle task, and changes in daily physical activity. The investigators will compare groups for altered well-being including: depression, sleep disturbances, fatigue, mindfulness, spirituality and quality of life. In addition the investigators will compare groups for altered vascular and pro-inflammatory markers, catecholamines, and autonomic function at rest and in response to the bicycle task. Also, the investigators will assess cardiac related hospitalization and death over a 12 month period by examining medical records.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

135

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • University of Califoria, San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ability to perform a 6-minute walk task, with or without use of a cane or walker (must use the same walking assistance device during each session), and walk under 500 meters during task.
  2. Symptoms of chronic heart failure for at least 3 months.
  3. Clinically stable- defined as not having been hospitalized for a 3 month period, on stable doses of neurohormonal blocking agents and diuretics for at least 3 months.
  4. ACC/AHA stages B and C
  5. Ability to perform light to moderate exercise (NYHA functional class II and III)
  6. Presence of HF with an ejection fraction less than 40%, or diastolic dysfunction
  7. Ability to give informed consent
  8. At least18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of recent myocardial infarction (1 month)
  2. Angina not adequately managed with nitrates.
  3. Aortic or mitral stenosis
  4. Coronary revascularization, mitral valve repair or any other cardiac surgery or implantation of a biventricular pacemaker within the past 6 months.
  5. Severe COPD
  6. Recent stroke or significant cerebral neurologic impairment.
  7. Active Suicidality
  8. Currently participating in an exercise program.
  9. Currently taking mood stabilizers (e.g. lithium), benzodiazepines or antipsychotics.
  10. Medications (steroids) and medical conditions affecting immune status not limited to Grave's Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hashimoto's Disease, Sjogren's Disease, Lupus, Multiple Sclerosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Tai Chi
32 1-hour group sessions of Tai Chi instruction
32 1-hour bi-weekly group sessions of Tai Chi instruction
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Resistance Band
32 1-hour bi-weekly group sessions of Resistance Band exercises
32 1-hour bi-weekly group sessions of Resistance Band exercises
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Health Education
32 1-hour bi-weekly group sessions of health education
32 1-hour bi-weekly group sessions of health education
NO_INTERVENTION: Care as Usual
Receive usual cardiology care for 4 months between pre- and post-treatment testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%LVEF)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in %LVEF Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in cardiac functional capacity as measured by %LVEF on echocardiogram.
Change from Baseline in %LVEF Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
End Systolic Volume (ESV)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in ESV Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in cardiac functional capacity as measured by ESV on echocardiogram.
Change from Baseline in ESV Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
End Diastolic Volume (EDV)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in EDV Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in cardiac functional capacity as measured by EDV on echocardiogram.
Change from Baseline in EDV Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in BNP Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in cardiac functional capacity as measured by serum levels of BNP.
Change from Baseline in BNP Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Six-Minute Walk Task (6MWT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in 6MWT Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in cardiac functional capacity as measured by 6MWT at post-treatment.
Change from Baseline in 6MWT Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Work Performed on Bicycle Ergometer Task (Watts)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in Watts Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in cardiac functional capacity as measured by average watts on a mild, graded exercise task on a bicycle ergometer at post-treatment assessment.
Change from Baseline in Watts Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Average Number of Steps Across 3 Days (Steps)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in Steps Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in cardiac functional capacity as measured by the average number of steps measured using a pedometer over a 3 day period immediately following 16 weeks of treatment.
Change from Baseline in Steps Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at Post-Treatment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in BDI Scores Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in depression scores as measured by the BDI immediately following 16 weeks of treatment.
Change from Baseline in BDI Scores Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
BDI at 8-Week Follow-Up
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in BDI scores at 8-week follow-up
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in depression scores as measured by the BDI at the 8-week follow-up assessment.
Change from Baseline in BDI scores at 8-week follow-up
BDI at 1-Year Follow-Up
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in BDI Scores at 1-year follow-up
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in depression scores as measured by the BDI at the 1-year follow-up assessment.
Change from Baseline in BDI Scores at 1-year follow-up
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI) at Post-Treatment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline on the (PSQI) Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in sleep quality scores as measured by the PSQI immediately following 16 weeks of treatment.
Change from Baseline on the (PSQI) Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
PSQI at 8-Week Follow-Up
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in PSQI scores at 8-week follow-up
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in sleep quality scores as measured by the PSQI at the 8-week follow-up assessment.
Change from Baseline in PSQI scores at 8-week follow-up
PSQI at 1-Year Follow-Up
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in PSQI Scores at 1-year Follow-Up Assessment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in sleep quality scores as measured by the PSQI at the 1-year follow-up assessment.
Change from Baseline in PSQI Scores at 1-year Follow-Up Assessment
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory (MFSI) at Post-Treatment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in MFSI Scores Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in fatigue scores as measured by the MFSI immediately following 16 weeks of treatment.
Change from Baseline in MFSI Scores Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
MFSI at 8-Week Follow-Up
Time Frame: Change From Baseline in MFSI Scores at 8-week Follow-up Assessment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in fatigue scores as measured by the MFSI at the 8-week follow-up assessment.
Change From Baseline in MFSI Scores at 8-week Follow-up Assessment
MFSI at 1-Year Follow-Up
Time Frame: Change From Baseline in MFSI Scores at the 1-Year Follow-Up Assessment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in fatigue scores as measured by the MFSI at the 1-year follow-up assessment.
Change From Baseline in MFSI Scores at the 1-Year Follow-Up Assessment
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) at Post-Treatment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in MLHFQ Scores Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in health-related quality of life scores as measured by the MHLFQ immediately following 16 weeks of treatment.
Change from Baseline in MLHFQ Scores Immediately Following 16 Weeks of Treatment
MHLFQ at 8-Week Follow-Up
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in MHLFQ at 8-Week Follow-Up Assessment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in health-related quality of life scores scores as measured by the PSQI at the 8-week follow-up assessment.
Change from Baseline in MHLFQ at 8-Week Follow-Up Assessment
MHLFQ at 1-Year Follow-Up Assessment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in MHLFQ Scores at 1-year Follow-Up Assessment
Determine whether Tai Chi compared with Resistance Exercise and Health Education control condition will lead to a greater improvement in health-related quality of life scores as measured by the MHLFQ at the 1-year follow-up assessment.
Change from Baseline in MHLFQ Scores at 1-year Follow-Up Assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura S Redwine, PhD, University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R01HL096784-01A2 (NIH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Tai Chi

3
Subscribe