Study of a 4-phasic Oral Contraceptive for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

July 8, 2015 updated by: Bayer

A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, 7 Cycle Duration (196 Days), Phase 3 Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Estradiol Valerate / Dienogest Tablets for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

To evaluate efficacy and safety of a combined oral contraceptive of estradiol valerate and dienogest in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

339

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100044
      • Beijing, China, 100730
      • Beijing, China, 100026
      • Beijing, China, 100034
      • Changchun, China
      • Chongqing, China, 400010
      • Qingdao, China, 266071
      • Shanghai, China, 200030
      • Shanghai, China, 2100129
      • Tianjin, China, 300211
      • Tianjin, China, 300193
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
    • Guangxi
      • Nanning, Guangxi, China, 530021
    • Hebei
      • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China, 050051
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430032
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410013
      • Hengyang, Hunan, China, 421001
    • Liaoning
      • Dalian, Liaoning, China, 116011
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610072
      • Manila, Philippines
      • Quezon City, Philippines
      • Irkutsk, Russian Federation, 664003
      • Ivanovo, Russian Federation, 153045
      • Krasnodar, Russian Federation, 350012
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117049
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117415
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194354
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199034
      • Singapore, Singapore, 169608
      • Singapore, Singapore, 229899
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
      • Tainan, Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women 18 years or older in generally good health with a diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding without organic pathology, requesting contraception
  • Willingness to use barrier contraception (e.g., condoms) from screening to study completion
  • Willingness to use and collect sanitary protection (pads and tampons) provided by the sponsor and compatible with the alkaline hematin test throughout study completion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of organic uterine bleeding
  • History of endometrial ablation, or dilatation and curettage within 2 months of Visit 1.
  • Clinically significant pelvic findings (whether or not confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound [TVU]).
  • Clinically significant abnormal results of breast examination (breast palpation).
  • Positive pregnancy test at Visit 1
  • Less than three months since delivery, abortion, or lactation before to start Visit 1
  • Other contraceptive methods
  • Any disease or condition that may worsen under hormonal treatment
  • Smokers over the age of 35
  • Body mass index >32

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
2 days of 3 mg estradiol valerate (EV);5 days of 2 mg EV + 2 mg dienogest (DNG);17 days of 2 mg EV + 3 mg DNG;2 days of 1 mg EV;2 days of placebo. A blister card consists of 28 pills, taken orally once a day for 7 cycles of 28 days each.
Placebo Comparator: Arm 2
Matching placebo to be taken orally daily for 7 cycles of 28 days each.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Absolute change in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) at baseline and 90 days
Time Frame: 90 day baseline period and 90 days during treatment period
90 day baseline period and 90 days during treatment period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects with successful treatment
Time Frame: 90 days during treatment phase
Successful treatment is defined as no bleeding episode with MBL of 80 mL or more and a decrease to a value </=50% of MBL compared to 90 day run-in period
90 days during treatment phase
Percent change of MBL at baseline and 90 day period during treatment phase
Time Frame: Baseline and 90 days during treatment phase
Baseline and 90 days during treatment phase
Absolute change of average MBL at baseline and up to cycle 7 (one cycle = 28 days)
Time Frame: Baseline and cycle 1, cycle 2, cycle 3, cycle 4, cycle 5, cycle 6, cycle 7
Baseline and cycle 1, cycle 2, cycle 3, cycle 4, cycle 5, cycle 6, cycle 7
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 84
Time Frame: Treatment day 84
Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Treatment day 84
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 196
Time Frame: Treatment day 196
Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Treatment day 196
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 84
Time Frame: Treatment day 84
Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Treatment day 84
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 196
Time Frame: Treatment day 196
Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Treatment day 196
Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metrorrhagia

Clinical Trials on EV/DNG (Qlaira, Natazia, BAY86-5027)

Subscribe