Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment

September 17, 2019 updated by: Unity Health Toronto

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Retinal Detachment; Anatomical Success, Functional Success and Impact on Patient Quality of Life

The purpose of this research study is to compare the outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy with the outcomes of vitrectomy (with or without scleral buckle) for the management of retinal detachment, in terms of anatomical success, functional success and impact on patient quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)is an acute, sight threatening condition, with an incidence of approximately 10 per 100,000 population. Both of the treatments under investigation are widely used and accepted by vitreoretinal surgeons, but randomised, prospective comparison of the two techniques has not been reported in the scientific literature to date. Currently, the management decisions surrounding primary retinal detachment are grounded on a weak evidence base. The findings of this study will allow vitreoretinal surgeons and their patients to select the most appropriate intervention for that individual, in an informed and holistic manner.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

176

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5C 2T2
        • Department of Ophthalmology, St Michael's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
  • Single retinal break OR group of breaks no larger than one clock hour (30°)
  • All break/s in detached retina between 8-4 o'clock
  • No significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inferior breaks in detached retina
  • Inability to read English language
  • Age < 18 years
  • Mental incapacity
  • Previous vitrectomy (index eye)
  • Previous retinal detachment (index eye)
  • Inability to maintain the post-operative posturing
  • Inability to carry out detailed examination of peripheral retina due to media opacity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vitrectomy
Pars plana vitrectomy plus laser/cryotherapy
Experimental: Pneumatic retinopexy
Pneumatic retinopexy plus laser/cryotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Visual acuity
Time Frame: 12 months post intervention
12 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post intervention
1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post intervention
Subjective visual function
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
Questionnaire
3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
Anatomical success (complete retinal re-attachment)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
Subjective health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month post intervention
Questionnaire
Baseline and 1 month post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rajeev H Muni, FRCSC, St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada)
  • Principal Investigator: Roxane J Hillier, FRCOphth, St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Clinical Trials on Vitrectomy

Subscribe