A Comparative Study of Papacarie® and the Conventional Method for Dental Caries Treatment

February 3, 2016 updated by: Kemporn Kitsahawong, Khon Kaen University

Study of Papacarie® for Caries Removal.

The purpose study are to evaluate the efficacy of Papacarie® for caries removal in comparison to the conventional drilling method.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dental caries in children continues to affect a significant portion of the world population, especially in developing countries. There are many techniques used for dental caries treatment. The conventional method is to remove caries and prepare the cavity using dental burs. Disadvantages of this method; however, include the patients' repulsion of drilling, and possible thermal changes on tooth surface that may have an effect on the dental pulp tissues. In addition, the drilling technique frequently requires local anesthesia injections and sometimes results in the removal of sound tooth tissues. To overcome these problems and preserve the healthy dental tissues, the chemo-mechanical caries removal method was developed. The advantage by chemomechanical caries removal include less traumatic, less need local anesthesia, reduced chance of dental pulp exposure. And also it could be benefit to medical compromised patients.

Papacarie® is a new chemo-mechanical technique for caries removal with few published research and case reports. A randomized controlled trial is therefore needed to determine the efficacy of its use in general population. The aims of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of a chemo-mechanical system (Papacarie®) for caries removal in comparison to the conventional drilling method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

488

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Khon Kaen
      • Muang, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002
        • Faculty of Dentistry , Khon Kaen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient inclusion criteria:
  • Child is between 7-8 years of ages (at date of enrollment) with at least one active caries lesion in second primary molar tooth with distinct dentine involvement requiring restoration
  • Child is in good general health and has no existing health condition that may interfere with treatment such as asthma, tuberculosis, rheumatic fever/ congenital heart diseases, jaundice, juvenile diabetes, haemophilia, thalassemia, leukemia, anemia , HIV , allergy to any drug, and epilepsy.
  • Tooth inclusion criteria:
  • Second primary molar tooth with one active caries lesion with distinct dentine involvement requiring restoration using the World Health Organization Criteria.
  • Tooth with isolated occlusal caries and caries extended on further than two-third of the dentine layer, which can be restoration as a Class I restoration.
  • Carious cavity must be large enough so that the hand instruments can be operated.
  • Tooth is vital without pathological process assessed clinically and radiographically.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient exclusion criteria:
  • Child whose parent does not give informed consent.
  • Child who are unwilling to undergo the dental treatment.
  • Child who has a known allergy to the ingredients contained in dental anesthesia, Papacarie® or glass-ionomer filling material.
  • Tooth exclusion criteria:
  • Having extensive dental caries which may require pulp treatment.
  • Tooth with a pathological process of the dental tissue other than caries that could affect the treatment, such as tooth development disorders or adjacent soft tissue lesion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control arm
control arm is dental caries removal using the conventional method. Dental caries will be removed using rotary instrument following the usual procedures employed by the dentist.
caries removal by using rotary instrument.
Experimental: Intervention arm
Intervention arm is dental caries removal using Papacarie®. The dentist will apply Papacarie® to dental cavity in order to soften the carious dentine. Dental caries will be removed using hand instrument.
Papacarie® is chemo-mechanical method for caries removal
Other Names:
  • Chemo-mechanical removal of decays Agent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time Frame: two years
The dental restorations were evaluated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment. Evaluation criteria included the condition of the filling material and presence of secondary caries at the margin of the restorations. The restoration status was re-categorized as a binary outcome: Treatment failure (Yes/No).
two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Secondary Caries
Time Frame: two years
The restoration teeth were assess by clinical and radiographic examination for detection the recurrent caries.
two years
Number of Participants With Complete Caries Removal
Time Frame: immediately after treatment
The efficacy of caries removal was evaluated by the visual and tactile criteria. The completeness of caries removal was judged on the basis of clinical criteria involving the inspection of the tooth surfaces using a good light source, dental mirror and explorer. A blunt explorer was used to detect surface roughness by gently stroking across the dentine surfaces and to evaluate the dentine hardness. Complete caries removal was achieved if as remove soft and infected dentine until felt hard and leathery consistency of the dentine surfaces. The tactile criteria include the smooth passage of the blunt explorer and absence of a catch or a "tug-back" sensation.
immediately after treatment
Levels of Pain and Discomfort
Time Frame: immediately after treatment
The participants were assessed for the levels of pain and discomfort using the facial visual analogue scale (VAS). The score was recorded in ruler scale from 0-100 millimeters, 0 = no pain and 100 = extreme pain) before treatment with the child sitting on the dental chair and after treatment (completion of carious tissue removal). The difference in the VAS scores before and after treatment was calculated and compared between the two comparison groups.
immediately after treatment
Time Use for Caries Removal
Time Frame: Immediately while treatment
The time taken for the removal of carious dentine was recorded using a stopwatch. Recorded time unit is seconds.
Immediately while treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kemporn Kitsahawong, DDS., MSc., Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HE542161
  • D43TW007768 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Conventional method

Subscribe