A Study to Determine Safety and Tolerability of Enzalutamide (MDV3100) in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate in Bone Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

January 16, 2019 updated by: Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

A Phase 2 Study Determining Safety and Tolerability of Enzalutamide (Formerly MDV3100) in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate in Bone Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

The purpose of this study was to explore the safety and tolerability of enzalutamide in combination with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone. Subjects diagnosed with cancer of the prostate that was getting worse and spreading to the bone despite receiving hormone treatment were enrolled and received study treatment until disease progression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For the study duration, all subjects maintained androgen deprivation with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist or orchiectomy. Study drug was administered until disease progression. Disease progression was defined as a composite endpoint consisting of either clinical deterioration, radiographic progression or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression according to the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Site US2492 MD Anderson Cancer Ctr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small cell features
  • Presence of metastatic disease to the bone
  • Ongoing androgen deprivation therapy with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue or orchiectomy (i.e., surgical or medical castration)
  • Subject receiving bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy must have been on stable doses for at least 4 weeks prior to Day 1
  • Progressive disease defined as one or more of the following three criteria (Note: subjects who received an antiandrogen must demonstrate disease progression following discontinuation of antiandrogen):

    • PSA progression defined by a minimum of two rising PSA levels with an interval of ≥ 1 week between each determination. The PSA value at the Screening visit should be ≥ 2 ng/mL
    • Soft tissue disease progression as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
    • Bone disease progression defined by PCWG2 criteria (two or more new lesions on bone scan compared with prior scan)
  • Subject previously treated with chemotherapy must have no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
  • Agree to use a double-barrier method of contraception which involves the use of a condom in combination with one of the following: contraceptive sponge, diaphragm, or cervical ring with spermicidal gel or foam, if having sex with a woman of child-bearing potential during the length of the study and for one week after abiraterone is discontinued and for at least three months after enzalutamide is discontinued
  • Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected metastases in the brain
  • Absolute neutrophil count < 1,000/μL, platelet count < 75,000/μL, and hemoglobin < 9 g/dL (NOTE: subject may not have received any growth factors or blood transfusions within seven days of the hematologic laboratory values obtained at the Screening visit)
  • Total bilirubin (TBL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2.5 times the upper limit of normal
  • Creatinine (Cr) > 2 mg/dL
  • Treatment with androgen receptor antagonists (bicalutamide, flutamide, nilutamide), 5-α reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride), estrogens, chemotherapy, or biologic therapy within 4 weeks of Day 1 visit
  • Radiation therapy within 3 weeks (if single fraction of radiotherapy within 2 weeks) of Day 1 visit, or radionuclide therapy within 8 weeks of Day 1
  • Planned palliative procedures for alleviation of bone pain such as radiation therapy or surgery
  • Structurally unstable bone lesions suggesting impending fracture
  • History of seizure or any condition that may predispose to seizure including, but not limited to underlying brain injury, stroke, primary brain tumors, brain metastases, or alcoholism. Also, history of loss of consciousness or transient ischemic attack within 12 months of enrollment (Day 1 visit)
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including:

    • Myocardial infarction within 6 months of Screening visit;
    • Uncontrolled angina within 3 months of Screening visit;
    • Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4, or subjects with history of congestive heart failure NYHA class 3 or 4 in the past, or history of anthracycline or anthracenedione (mitoxantrone) treatment, unless a screening echocardiogram or multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) performed within three months of the Screening visit results in a left ventricular ejection fraction that is ≥ 45%
    • History of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias (e.g., ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, torsade de pointes)
    • Prolonged corrected QT interval by the Fridericia correction formula (QTcF) on the Electrocardiogram (ECG) > 470 msec.
    • History of Mobitz II second degree or third degree heart block without a permanent pacemaker in place
    • Hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 86 mmHg or bradycardia with a heart rate of <50 beats per minute on the ECG., unless pharmaceutically induced and thus reversible (i.e. beta blockers).
    • Uncontrolled hypertension as indicated by a resting systolic blood pressure >170 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >105 mmHg
  • Prior use of ketoconazole, abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, or participation in a previous clinical trial of ketoconazole, abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide
  • History of significant bleeding disorder unrelated to cancer, including:

    • Diagnosed congenital bleeding disorders (e.g., von Willebrand's disease)
    • Diagnosed acquired bleeding disorder within one year (e.g., acquired anti-factor VIII antibodies) of Screening visit
    • History of GI bleeding within 6 months of Screening visit
  • Active or symptomatic viral hepatitis or chronic liver disease
  • Known history of pituitary or adrenal dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisone
Participants received enzalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate once daily plus prednisone twice daily.
Participants received 160 mg of enzalutamide orally once daily (4 capsules, 40 mg each).
Other Names:
  • MDV3100
Participants received 1000 mg of abiraterone acetate orally once daily (4 tablets, 250 mg each).
Participants received 5 mg of prednisone orally twice daily (2 tablets, 5 mg each).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up 30 days following the last dose of study drug date, with a median duration of treatment of 10.1 months.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event occurring or worsening between the start of study treatment date and the latest date of 30 days after the last dose date or the 30-day follow-up visit date, and not later than the data cut-off date or the date of death. AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) guidelines (V4.03).
From the first dose of study drug administration up 30 days following the last dose of study drug date, with a median duration of treatment of 10.1 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Testosterone Concentration in Bone Marrow Aspirate
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Testosterone concentration in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Bone Marrow Aspirate
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
DHT concentration in bone marrow aspirate was to be measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. DHT bone data were not collected.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Cortisol in Bone Marrow Aspirate
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Cortisol in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Androstenedione in Bone Marrow Aspirate
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Androstenedione in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Progesterone in Bone Marrow Aspirate
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Progesterone in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Pregnenolone in Bone Marrow Aspirate
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Pregnenolone in bone marrow aspirate was measured by laboratory results derived from bone marrow samples.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Testosterone Concentration in Blood
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Testosterone concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in DHT Concentration in Blood
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
DHT concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The endpoint could not be analyzed since no participants had DHT levels over the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ).
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Cortisol Concentration in Blood
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Cortisol concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Androstenedione Concentration in Blood
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Androstenedione concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Progesterone Concentration in Blood
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Progesterone concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline in Pregnenolone Concentration in Blood
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Pregnenolone concentration in blood was measured by laboratory results derived from plasma samples. Plasma samples were derived from collected blood samples processed through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
Baseline and Week 9
Change From Baseline to End-of-Treatment (EoT) in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels
Time Frame: Baseline and EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.
Prostate-specific antigen progression by Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) was defined as a PSA increase ≥25% and ≥2 ng/ml above the post-baseline nadir, and which was confirmed by the first subsequent value of 3 or more weeks later.
Baseline and EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to 1849 days
PFS was measured as the time from the date of first dose of any drug of the study combination treatment until the first evidence of documented progression (a composite endpoint consisting of radiographic progression or PSA progression by PCWG2 or clinical deterioration) or death in the absence of progression (whichever came first) or the date last known to be progression free. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley robust non-parametric method.
Up to 1849 days
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response for Soft Tissue Lesions According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST)
Time Frame: Up to 1849 days
Objective response was based on RECIST version 1.1 for soft tissue lesion on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) / Computerized tomography (CT) and the PCWG2 guidelines for bone lesions on bone scans and was defined as partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on the investigators' assessments of target, non-target and new lesions while on study treatment. The 95% for objective response rate was based on exact binomial 95% confidence interval (Clopper-Pearson).
Up to 1849 days
Bone Scan Response at EoT
Time Frame: EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.
PD: ≥1 of 3 criteria: PSA progression: ≥2 rising PSA levels, interval of ≥1 week between each determination. Soft tissue disease progression: RECIST 1.1. Bone disease progression: PCWG2 criteria (≥2 or new lesions on bone scan compared with prior scan). Target lesion CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR as ≥30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, referencing baseline sum LD, SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referencing smallest sum LD since treatment start, PD ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions, referencing smallest sum LD recorded since treatment start or appearance of ≥1 new lesions. Non-target lesions CR: disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, SD: persistence of ≥1 non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits, PD: appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase
Time Frame: Baseline and EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.
Bone metabolism marker bone specific alkaline phosphatase levels were derived from blood samples collected.
Baseline and EoT; the median duration of treatment was 10.1 months.
Change From Baseline in Urine N-Telopeptide
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
Bone metabolism marker urine N-telopeptide levels were derived from urine samples collected.
Baseline and Week 9

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Androgen Receptor Signaling Assessed by Expression and Localization of Androgen Receptor (AR), CYP17 Expression, Splice Variants, and Pathways Linked With Non-classical AR Signaling and Bone Development
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 9
The endpoint was considered exploratory and no analysis was planned.
Baseline and Week 9

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Associate Medical Director, Astellas Pharma Global Development

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 9, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the trial, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for trials conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on enzalutamide

3
Subscribe