Simplified Severe Sepsis Protocol-2 (SSSP-2) in Zambia (SSSP-2)

September 23, 2021 updated by: Vanderbilt University

Simplified Severe Sepsis Protocol-2 (SSSP-2): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Bundled Intervention for Severe Sepsis at the University Teaching Hospital in Zambia

This study is a randomized control trial assessing the impact of a simple evidence-based protocol for the treatment severe sepsis with hypotension in Zambia. This is a follow-up study to the Simplified Severe Sepsis Protocol (SSSP) study. The intervention protocol consists of a scheduled fluid regimen, early blood culture and antibiotics, and dopamine and blood transfusion when necessary. It is hypothesized that the protocol will significantly decrease in-hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis and hypotension.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In recent years, evidence-based protocols of bundled therapies have improved survival of severe sepsis in developed countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, simple therapies such as IV fluids and early antibiotics are frequently under-utilized. Studies of fluid interventions in the region, however, have demonstrated conflicting results. Outcomes in septic patients may be further affected by delays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis-associated severe sepsis.

The aims of this study are (1) To assess the impact on survival of a simple evidence-based protocol for severe sepsis with hypotensionor septic shock, (2) To evaluate the cost of implementation for a simplified severe sepsis protocol, (3) To develop a clinical diagnostic score for identifying tuberculosis in HIV positive patients with severe sepsis, and (4) To assess the performance of the Xpert TB/RIF rapid PCR system and urine lipoarabinomannan assay for diagnosing tuberculosis in HIV positive patients with severe sepsis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

212

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lusaka, Zambia
        • University Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • infection suspected by the treating physician
  • 2 or more of the following SIRS criteria:
  • - Heart rate >90/min
  • Respiratory rate >20/min
  • - Temperature ≥ 38° C or < 36° C
  • White blood count > 12,000 or < 4,000/µL
  • 1 of the following:
  • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤ 90 mm Hg
  • Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) ≤ 65 mm Hg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gastrointestinal bleed in the absence of fever
  • Need for immediate surgery
  • Respiratory rate greater than 40/min with oxygen saturation less than 90%
  • Suspected congestive heart failure exacerbation
  • End-stage renal disease
  • Raised jugular venous pressure (JVP) at baseline
  • Currently incarcerated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual care
Patients are managed according to admitting doctors' orders. Blood cultures are drawn in all patients. Antibiotics are specified by the admitting doctors.
Patients are managed according to admitting doctors' orders
Experimental: Simplified Severe Sepsis Protocol
This protocol consists of an early aggressive fluid strategy, early blood cultures and antibiotics, and, when appropriate, blood transfusion and titratable dopamine. Monitoring is based on physical exam findings. Antibiotics are specified by the admitting doctors.
This protocol consists of an early aggressive fluid strategy, and, when appropriate, blood transfusion and titratable dopamine. Monitoring is based on physical exam findings.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
In-hospital all cause mortality
Time Frame: During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
During hospitalization, expected average 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 28-day
28-day
In-hospital all cause mortality adjusted for illness severity
Time Frame: During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
Adjusted for SAPS3 score
During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
28-day all cause mortality adjusted for baseline illness severity
Time Frame: 28-day
Adjusted for SAPS3 score
28-day
Cumulative adverse events
Time Frame: During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
A composite outcome consisting of dopamine extravasation, dopamine-associated tissue ischemia or necrosis, iatrogenic pulmonary oedema, and transfusion-related adverse events.
During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
Treatment cost per patient
Time Frame: During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
A budget impact analysis will determine the cost of treatment per patient using a mix of direct measurements and micro-cost observation.
During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
Antibiotic changed due to culture results
Time Frame: During hospitalization, expected average 14 days
The proportion of patients whose antibiotic regimen was changed due to information obtained from blood culture results.
During hospitalization, expected average 14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin L Andrews, MD, Vanderbilt University and University of Zambia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Requests for data sharing should be directed to PI. PI will then confer with Zambian co-PI to confirm that data sharing is allowable by Zambian law.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Usual care

Subscribe