- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01667029
Study of Sulfasalazine in Treating Painful Neuropathy
July 26, 2018 updated by: Brian Wainger, Massachusetts General Hospital
A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sulfasalazine on Painful Neuropathy
The investigators hypothesize that sulfasalazine, an FDA-approved medication for rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis, may be beneficial in neuropathic pain conditions.
In this study, the investigators will evaluate whether sulfasalazine improves pain due to painful peripheral neuropathy.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
8
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Painful neuropathy
- Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument score of 3 or greater
- no obvious alternative explanation for neuropathy
- average baseline pain > 4/10
Exclusion Criteria:
- other severe pain
- anticipated difficulty weaning off medications
- past or current psychiatric disorder as determined by Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
- medical contraindication to sulfasalazine
- not proficient in English (due to heavy use of questionaires)
- pregnant or breast feeding women
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: sulfasalazine
1 g oral twice daily for 2 weeks
|
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo
oral placebo pill twice daily for two weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Score (First Treatment Period)
Time Frame: second week of two week treatment period
|
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary during the second week of the two week treatment period.
Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).
|
second week of two week treatment period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Score (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary during the second week of the two week treatment period.
Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Number of Patients With >=50% Pain Reduction (First Treatment Period)
Time Frame: second week of two week treatment period
|
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary at baseline and during the second week of the two week treatment period.
Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).
Percent pain reduction will be calculated from BL to end of treatment period 1 (2 weeks), based on average pain scores at each time point.
|
second week of two week treatment period
|
Number of Patients With >=50% Pain Reduction (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary during baseline and the second week of each of the two week treatment periods.
Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).
Percent pain reduction will be calculated from BL to end of treatment period 1 (2 weeks) and from end of treatment period 1 to end of treatment period 2 (2 weeks), based on average pain scores at each time point.
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
The BPI interference items are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (including housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
The seven items are rated from 0 (pain does not interfere) to 10 (pain completely interferes).
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Euroquality of Life (EQ-5D) Metrics (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
The EQ-5D physical functioning items are mobility self-care, and usual activities.
These three items are rated from 1 (no problems) to 5 (unable).
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
The BPI interference items are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (including housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
The seven items are rated from 0 (pain does not interfere) to 10 (pain completely interferes).
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Euroquality of Life (EQ-5D) (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
The EQ-5D physical functioning items are mobility self-care, and usual activities.
These three items are rated from 1 (no problems) to 5 (unable).
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Emotional Functioning (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Will be assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total score.
The BDI has 21 items, each scored 0-3.
Higher values are worse.
The total score is the sum of the 21 items and ranges from 0-63.
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Emotional Functioning (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Will be assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total score.
The BDI has 21 items, each scored 0-3.
Higher values are worse.
The total score is the sum of the 21 items and ranges from 0-63.
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Overall Improvement (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Item 1 is as follows: Since beginning treatment at this clinic, how would you describe the change (if any) in ACTIVITY LIMITATIONS, SYMPTOMS, EMOTIONS, and OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE, related to your painful condition?
(tick ONE box) (1=No change (or condition has gotten worse), 2=Almost the same, hardly any change at all, 3=A little better, but no noticeable change, 4=Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference, 5=Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change, 6=Better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference, 7=A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference).
Item 2 is as follows: In a similar way, please circle the number below that matches your degree of change since beginning care at this clinic (0-10 scale): 0= Much better, 5= No change, 10= Much worse.
|
Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Overall Improvement (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Item 1 is as follows: Since beginning treatment at this clinic, how would you describe the change (if any) in ACTIVITY LIMITATIONS, SYMPTOMS, EMOTIONS, and OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE, related to your painful condition?
(tick ONE box) (1=No change (or condition has gotten worse), 2=Almost the same, hardly any change at all, 3=A little better, but no noticeable change, 4=Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference, 5=Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change, 6=Better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference, 7=A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference).
Item 2 is as follows: In a similar way, please circle the number below that matches your degree of change since beginning care at this clinic (0-10 scale): 0= Much better, 5= No change, 10= Much worse.
|
Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Categorical Rating of Pain Intensity (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Assessed using number of days rated as none, mild, moderate, or severe in pain diary
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Categorical Rating of Pain Intensity (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Assessed using number of days rated as none, mild, moderate, or severe in pain diary
|
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
|
Breakthrough Treatment (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Number of days breakthrough pain medication was taken
|
Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Breakthrough Treatment (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Number of days breakthrough pain medication was taken
|
Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Missed Medication Dose (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Number of missed medication doses
|
Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Missed Medication Doses (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Number of missed medication doses
|
Assessed during two week treatment period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brian J Wainger, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 10, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
August 10, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 16, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
August 17, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 22, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 26, 2018
Last Verified
July 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2012-p-001443
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Painful Neuropathy
-
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo...Yale University; University of Manchester; Maastricht University; Ospedale San... and other collaboratorsUnknownPainful Peripheral Neuropathy | Painless Peripheral Neuropathy
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownPainful Peripheral Neuropathy
-
Helixmith Co., Ltd.CompletedDiabetic Neuropathy, Painful | Painful Diabetic NeuropathyUnited States
-
Helixmith Co., Ltd.CompletedDiabetic Neuropathy, Painful | Painful Diabetic NeuropathyUnited States
-
WinSanTor, IncCompletedPeripheral Neuropathy | Painful Diabetic Neuropathy | Diabetic Neuropathies, PainfulCanada
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedPainful Diabetic Neuropathy | Diabetic Neuropathies, Painful | Neuralgia, DiabeticNetherlands
-
Nevro CorpRecruitingPainful Diabetic NeuropathyUnited States
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRecruitingPainful Diabetic NeuropathyUnited States
-
Duta Wacana Christian UniversityPT SOHO Global Health TbkUnknownPainful Diabetic NeuropathyIndonesia
-
Helixmith Co., Ltd.Completed
Clinical Trials on placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States