Study of Sulfasalazine in Treating Painful Neuropathy

July 26, 2018 updated by: Brian Wainger, Massachusetts General Hospital

A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sulfasalazine on Painful Neuropathy

The investigators hypothesize that sulfasalazine, an FDA-approved medication for rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis, may be beneficial in neuropathic pain conditions. In this study, the investigators will evaluate whether sulfasalazine improves pain due to painful peripheral neuropathy.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Painful neuropathy
  • Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument score of 3 or greater
  • no obvious alternative explanation for neuropathy
  • average baseline pain > 4/10

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other severe pain
  • anticipated difficulty weaning off medications
  • past or current psychiatric disorder as determined by Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
  • medical contraindication to sulfasalazine
  • not proficient in English (due to heavy use of questionaires)
  • pregnant or breast feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: sulfasalazine
1 g oral twice daily for 2 weeks
Placebo Comparator: placebo
oral placebo pill twice daily for two weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score (First Treatment Period)
Time Frame: second week of two week treatment period
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary during the second week of the two week treatment period. Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).
second week of two week treatment period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary during the second week of the two week treatment period. Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Number of Patients With >=50% Pain Reduction (First Treatment Period)
Time Frame: second week of two week treatment period
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary at baseline and during the second week of the two week treatment period. Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Percent pain reduction will be calculated from BL to end of treatment period 1 (2 weeks), based on average pain scores at each time point.
second week of two week treatment period
Number of Patients With >=50% Pain Reduction (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Average pain score will be the average of daily pain scores (0-10) recorded by the subject in a pain diary during baseline and the second week of each of the two week treatment periods. Higher scores are worse (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Percent pain reduction will be calculated from BL to end of treatment period 1 (2 weeks) and from end of treatment period 1 to end of treatment period 2 (2 weeks), based on average pain scores at each time point.
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
The BPI interference items are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (including housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The seven items are rated from 0 (pain does not interfere) to 10 (pain completely interferes).
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Euroquality of Life (EQ-5D) Metrics (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
The EQ-5D physical functioning items are mobility self-care, and usual activities. These three items are rated from 1 (no problems) to 5 (unable).
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
The BPI interference items are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (including housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The seven items are rated from 0 (pain does not interfere) to 10 (pain completely interferes).
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Physical Functioning Score Assessed Using the Euroquality of Life (EQ-5D) (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
The EQ-5D physical functioning items are mobility self-care, and usual activities. These three items are rated from 1 (no problems) to 5 (unable).
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Emotional Functioning (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Will be assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total score. The BDI has 21 items, each scored 0-3. Higher values are worse. The total score is the sum of the 21 items and ranges from 0-63.
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Emotional Functioning (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Will be assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total score. The BDI has 21 items, each scored 0-3. Higher values are worse. The total score is the sum of the 21 items and ranges from 0-63.
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Overall Improvement (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. Item 1 is as follows: Since beginning treatment at this clinic, how would you describe the change (if any) in ACTIVITY LIMITATIONS, SYMPTOMS, EMOTIONS, and OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE, related to your painful condition? (tick ONE box) (1=No change (or condition has gotten worse), 2=Almost the same, hardly any change at all, 3=A little better, but no noticeable change, 4=Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference, 5=Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change, 6=Better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference, 7=A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference). Item 2 is as follows: In a similar way, please circle the number below that matches your degree of change since beginning care at this clinic (0-10 scale): 0= Much better, 5= No change, 10= Much worse.
Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
Overall Improvement (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. Item 1 is as follows: Since beginning treatment at this clinic, how would you describe the change (if any) in ACTIVITY LIMITATIONS, SYMPTOMS, EMOTIONS, and OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE, related to your painful condition? (tick ONE box) (1=No change (or condition has gotten worse), 2=Almost the same, hardly any change at all, 3=A little better, but no noticeable change, 4=Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference, 5=Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change, 6=Better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference, 7=A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference). Item 2 is as follows: In a similar way, please circle the number below that matches your degree of change since beginning care at this clinic (0-10 scale): 0= Much better, 5= No change, 10= Much worse.
Will be assessed at end of two week treatment period
Categorical Rating of Pain Intensity (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Assessed using number of days rated as none, mild, moderate, or severe in pain diary
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Categorical Rating of Pain Intensity (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Assessed using number of days rated as none, mild, moderate, or severe in pain diary
Assessed at end of two week treatment period
Breakthrough Treatment (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
Number of days breakthrough pain medication was taken
Assessed during two week treatment period
Breakthrough Treatment (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
Number of days breakthrough pain medication was taken
Assessed during two week treatment period
Missed Medication Dose (First Treatment Period Only)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
Number of missed medication doses
Assessed during two week treatment period
Missed Medication Doses (Using the Crossover Comparison Structure of the Study)
Time Frame: Assessed during two week treatment period
Number of missed medication doses
Assessed during two week treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian J Wainger, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Painful Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe