The Effect of Oral Vitamin D Versus Narrow-Band UV-B Exposure on the Lipid Profile

October 6, 2017 updated by: Manish Ponda, Rockefeller University
Participants in this study will be randomized to receive either oral vitamin D pills OR ultraviolet light treatment. The investigators will compare how these two methods of raising vitamin D levels will affect cholesterol levels.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Potential subjects will be screened for eligibility, including serum 25(OH)D levels <20ng/ml. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either: 1) oral vitamin D3, 50,000 units weekly for 8 weeks or 2) narrow-band UVB radiation, 2 treatments/wk for 8 weeks. Duration of treatment will be based on skin type. After 8 weeks, 25(OH)D levels will be measured monthly. For participants with levels <35 ng/ml, additional doses of oral vitamin D3 or UV radiation will be administered.

A subset of participants from both groups will participate in a skin biopsy cohort, where skin biopsies are obtained before and after 8 weeks of treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • The Rockefeller University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years
  2. Vitamin D 25-OH level < 20 ng/ml

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Serum calcium > 10.5 mg/dl
  2. Serum phosphorus > 5.5 mg/dl
  3. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level < 12 pg/ml
  4. LDL cholesterol > 190 mg/dl
  5. History of recent acute infection (within 1 month)
  6. Glomerular filtration rate(GFR) < 60 mL/min
  7. Liver Function tests indicative of liver disease (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine transferase (ALT) > 3x ULN)
  8. Current use of Vitamin D > 400 IU/day
  9. Current use of any statins, fibrates, niacin, or ezetimibe
  10. Current use of any medications affecting sensitivity to UV light
  11. Pregnancy (self-reported)
  12. Intentional UV exposure (e.g. tanning bed use) in the last 2 weeks or planned use while participating in the study
  13. history of malignancy not in remission (> 6 months)
  14. History of malignant melanoma
  15. Participation in an investigational drug study within 30 days of the screening visit
  16. Any medical, psychological or social condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize the health or well-being of the participant during any study procedures or the integrity of the data.
  17. History of any non-melanoma skin cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Oral Vitamin D3
Participants will receive oral vitamin D3 50,000 units weekly for 8 weeks. If 25(OH)D levels remain <35 ng/ml, subjects will receive additional doses of oral vitamin D.
50,000 units orally, each week x8 weeks; supplemental doses of 50,000 units orally, each month thereafter as needed
Active Comparator: Ultraviolet Light
Subjects will receive 16 treatments with ultraviolet light (narrow band UVB) over 8 weeks. If 25(OH)D levels remain <35 ng/ml, subjects will receive additional doses of narrow band UVB.
16 treatments, 2-3 times weekly over 8 weeks; initial dose 45-75 seconds, whole-body exposure except face and groin, increasing by 10% as tolerated, to a maximum of 4.5 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in LDL Cholesterol Level
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)
baseline and 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)
Change in Total Cholesterol
baseline and 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)
Change in HDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)
baseline and 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)
Change in Triglycerides
Time Frame: baseline 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)
baseline 6 months or last observation carried forward (minimum 2 months)
Change in C Reactive Protein
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
baseline and 6 months
Change in 25(OH)D
Time Frame: baseline vs. 6 months
baseline vs. 6 months
Change in Serum Calcium
Time Frame: baseline vs. 6 months
baseline vs. 6 months
Change in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
Time Frame: baseline vs.6 months
baseline vs.6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Between Change in LDL Cholesterol and Change in Calcium
Time Frame: 2 months
The Correlation between change in LDL cholesterol and change in serum calcium
2 months
Correlation Between Change in LDL Cholesterol and Change in PTH
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
Gene Expression Changes in Peripheral Blood
Time Frame: baseline vs. 2 months
Interferon response genesets (curated by GSEA). Values are presented as the normalized enrichment score, a metric of gene upregulation (when positive) or down-regulation (when negative), normalized for gene set size. This is a useful basis for comparison for direction and degree of change between treatment groups and GSEA genesets.
baseline vs. 2 months
Gene Expression Changes in Skin
Time Frame: baseline vs. 2 months
Interferon response genesets (curated by GSEA). Values are presented as the normalized enrichment score, a metric of gene upregulation (when positive) or down-regulation (when negative), normalized for gene set size. This is a useful basis for comparison for direction and degree of change between treatment groups and GSEA genesets.
baseline vs. 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manish Ponda, MD MS, The Rockefeller University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Oral Vitamin D3

Subscribe