Study to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy of d-Amphetamine Transdermal System vs Placebo in Children & Adolescents With ADHD

December 20, 2023 updated by: Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover, Laboratory Classroom Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of d-Amphetamine Transdermal Drug Delivery System (d-ATS) Compared to Placebo in Children and Adolescents With ADHD

This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of d-Amphetamine Transdermal System for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in children and adolescents.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will consist of a four-week screening period, a 3-day wash-out period (if applicable), a five-week open-label, step-wise dose optimization period and two-week double blind randomized crossover treatment period with weekly classroom assessments and a safety follow-up by telephone 7 - 10 days after last dose of study drug.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92612
        • University of California - Irvine
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33199
        • Florida International University Center for Children and Families
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89128
        • Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Gender: Male or female
  2. Age: Between 6 and 17 years of age (inclusive)
  3. Race: All eligible
  4. Females of child-bearing potential must have agreed to practice a clinically accepted method of contraception during the study and for at least 1 month prior to study dosing and 1 month following completion of the study. Acceptable contraceptive methods included abstinence, oral contraception, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy), intrauterine device, diaphragm in addition to spermicidal foam and condom on male partner, or systemic contraception (e.g., Norplant System)
  5. Must have met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition - Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for a primary diagnosis of ADHD combined, hyperactive/impulsive subtype, or predominately inattentive subtype
  6. The Screening and Baseline visit ADHD-RS-IV total score must have been ≥90% of the general population of children by age and gender
  7. Able to wear a patch for 9 hours (for children and, if applicable, for adolescents, parent or caregiver must be present to apply and remove the patches and maintain the used and unused patches in a secure, controlled area of the home)
  8. Functioning at an age-appropriate level intellectually as determined by an intelligence quotient (IQ) of ≥80 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence II™ (WASI II™) vocabulary and matrix reasoning components
  9. Must have been able to complete PERMP assessment
  10. Must have provided parental consent (signed ICF) and obtained written/verbal assent from the subject
  11. Subject and parent(s)/ caregiver must have been willing and able to comply with all the protocol requirements and parent(s) or caregiver must be able to provide transportation for the subject to and from the analog classroom sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Blood pressure outside the 95th percentile for age and gender
  2. Pulse of <50 (age 6 - 17), or >120 (age 6 - 12), or >125 (age 13 - 17)
  3. Known non-responder to amphetamine treatment
  4. Documented allergy, intolerance, or hypersensitivity to amphetamine
  5. Currently taking an ADHD medication that is providing symptom control with no residual impairment at home or school and has acceptable tolerability and adherence
  6. Recent history (within the past 6 months) of suspected substance abuse or dependence disorder (including nicotine)
  7. History of seizures during the last 2 years (excluding infantile febrile seizures), a tic disorder (exclusive of transient tic disorder), a current diagnosis, and/or a family history of Tourette's Disorder. Mild medication-induced tics were not exclusionary
  8. Any psychiatric disorder that could interfere with study participation or the safety of the subject or other participants, such as conduct disorder (CD) or oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) with a history of prominent aggressive outbursts. Children meeting CD or ODD but without prominent aggression will be allowed to enroll at the discretion of the Investigator
  9. Autism or Asperger's Disorder
  10. Family history (first degree relatives) of sudden cardiac death
  11. Current controlled (requiring medication) or uncontrolled comorbid psychiatric conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, bipolar illness, severe obsessive compulsive disorder, severe depressive or severe anxiety disorder, was considered a suicide risk, had recent (last 6 months) suicidal ideation, or any lifetime self-harm event
  12. History of abnormal thyroid function
  13. Has a body mass index (BMI) for age greater than 95th percentile per Centers for Disease Control BMI (for gender-specific charts)
  14. Known history of symptomatic cardiovascular disease, advanced arteriosclerosis, structural cardiac abnormality, cardiomyopathy, serious heart rhythm abnormalities, coronary artery disease, or other serious cardiac problems that may place them at increased vulnerability to the sympathomimetic effects of a stimulant drug
  15. Any skin abnormality present at the potential application site (i.e., infection, rash, atrophy, excessive fragility or dryness, any cut or abrasion, or tattoo)
  16. History of hypersensitivity, allergy to topical medication, preparation, or adhesive dressings
  17. Concurrent chronic or significant acute illnesses (such as severe allergic rhinitis or an infectious process requiring antibiotics, unless expected to resolve or has resolved by Day 0) disability or any unstable medical condition that in the Investigator's opinion would lead to difficulty complying with the protocol requirements
  18. Used any investigational drug within 30 days of the Screening visit
  19. History of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse in the last year
  20. Medical history of hepatitis A/B/C or HIV
  21. Positive urine drug screen for drugs of abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: d-Amphetamine Transdermal patch

The study was conducted in 2 parts: a 5-week, open-label, step-wise Dose Optimization Period and a 2-week, randomized, cross-over Double-Blind Treatment Period.

Subjects who reached the optimal dose by end of dose optimization treatment period were randomized to receive double-blind treatment.

Participants first received study patches everyday for one week, then subjects were crossed-over to receive the placebo treatment.

d-Amphetamine Transdermal System: Patches will be worn for 9 hours every day. After 9 hours the patch will be removed. Every day a new patch will be applied.

The study was conducted in 2 parts: a 5 week, open-label, step-wise Dose Optimization Period and a 2-week, randomized, cross-over Double-Blind Treatment Period.

Patches will be worn for 9 hours every day. After 9 hours the patch will be removed. Every day a new patch will be applied.

Other Names:
  • Amphetamine
  • d-Amphetamine
Placebo Comparator: Placebo patch

The study was conducted in 2 parts: a 5-week, open-label, step-wise Dose Optimization Period and a 2-week, randomized, cross-over Double-Blind Treatment Period.

Subjects who reached the optimal dose by end of dose optimization treatment period were randomized to receive double-blind treatment.

Participants first received placebo patches everyday for one week, then subjects were crossed-over to receive the study treatment.

Placebo patch: Patches will be worn for 9 hours every day. After 9 hours the patch will be removed. Every day a new patch will be applied.

The study was conducted in 2 parts: a 5 week, open-label, step-wise Dose Optimization Period and a 2-week, randomized, cross-over Double-Blind Treatment Period.

Patches will be worn for 9 hours every day. After 9 hours the patch will be removed. Every day a new patch will be applied.

Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Sham treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Total Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Mean SKAMP Total Score of SKAMP Total Scores from 9 different time points including (1, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12 hours post-dose)
The SKAMP total score comprises all 13 items. The SKAMP was designed for independent observers to rate 13 items representing 2 factors of classroom behavior: attention (SKAMP-A) and deportment (SKAMP-D), as well as quality of work. Items are specific to place (classroom setting) & time (during a typical classroom period), & the scale is used to assess multiple ratings taken within a day. The SKAMP-D subscale evaluates deportment, including interacting with other children, interacting with adults, remaining quiet according to classroom rules, & staying seated according to classroom rules. The SKAMP-A subscale is a measure of attention & evaluates getting started on assignments, sticking with tasks, attending to an activity, and making activity transitions. The SKAMP quality of work subscale includes 3 items: completing assigned work, performing work accurately, and being careful and neat while writing or drawing. Scores range from 0-78 with higher scores indicating worse impairment.
Mean SKAMP Total Score of SKAMP Total Scores from 9 different time points including (1, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12 hours post-dose)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset of Efficacy Measured by Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Total Score
Time Frame: Onset of efficacy defined as the time of the first assessment time showing statistical significance between d-ATS and placebo. 2 hours post-dose in Double-Blind Treatment Period

Onset of efficacy defined as the time of the first assessment time showing statistical significance between d-ATS and placebo. The time point for the reported data are SKAMP scores (LS mean) from 2 hours post-dose.

The SKAMP total score comprises all 13 items. The SKAMP was designed for independent observers to rate 13 items representing 2 factors of classroom behavior: attention (SKAMP-A) and deportment (SKAMP-D), as well as quality of work. Items are specific to place (classroom setting) & time (during a typical classroom period), & the scale is used to assess multiple ratings taken within a day. Scores range from 0-78 with higher scores indicating worse impairment.

Onset of efficacy defined as the time of the first assessment time showing statistical significance between d-ATS and placebo. 2 hours post-dose in Double-Blind Treatment Period
Duration of Effect for d-Amphetamine and Placebo Treatment
Time Frame: Duration of Effect was from onset (2 hours post-dose) and up to 12 hours post-dose (p<0.001)
Duration of Effect is the difference between the End of Effect and Onset of Effect in hours, where End of Effect is the first time point after Onset of Effect at which the 50% reduction in SKAMP total score from pre-dose is not observed.
Duration of Effect was from onset (2 hours post-dose) and up to 12 hours post-dose (p<0.001)
Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores Including PREMP-C and PREMP-A From Different Timepoints Post-dose
Time Frame: 1,2, 3, 4.5,6,7,9,10 and 12 hours post-dose from double-blind treatment period
To assess efficacy of d-ATS compared to placebo as measured by the PERMP-C (number of correct answers) and PERMP-A (number of attempted answers) score. The PERMP is an age-adjusted written math test, of 10 minutes' duration administered at multiple time points. Subjects are given 5 pages of 80 math problems (400 total problems) and are instructed to work at their desks and to complete as many problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is measured as the number of problems attempted (PERMP-A) and the number of problems worked correctly (PERMP-C). The scores range from 0-800 with higher scores indicating better performance.
1,2, 3, 4.5,6,7,9,10 and 12 hours post-dose from double-blind treatment period
Change in the Clinician-rated Scale of ADHD Symptoms Based on DSM-IV-TR Criteria (ADHD-RS-IV).
Time Frame: Averaged from week 6 and week 7 results during the Double-Blind Cross-Over treatment period.

The ADHD-RS-IV is based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria to assess efficacy of d-ATS compared to placebo. The ADHD-RS-IV scale was developed to measure the behaviors of children with ADHD, and it consists of 18 items designed to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on DSM-IV criteria. Each item is scored from a range of 0 (reflecting no symptoms) to 3 (reflecting severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0 to 54.

Note: Week 6 is the first week of the double-blind treatment period, week 7 is the second week of the double-blind treatment period.

Averaged from week 6 and week 7 results during the Double-Blind Cross-Over treatment period.
Conners Parent Rating Scale Revised Short Form (CPRS-R:S) Total Scores From Week 6 and Week 7
Time Frame: Combined analysis by treatment groups from week 6 and week 7 (averaged)

The CPRS-R:S evaluates problem behaviors as reported by the parent or alternative caregivers. The CPRS-R:S total score comprises 27 items and covers a subset of the subscales and items on the long parent form. The score ranges from 0-81 calculated from summed subscales scores. Higher score is considered a worse outcome for ADHD patients.

Note: Week 6 is the first week of the double-blind treatment period, week 7 is the second week of the double-blind treatment period.

Combined analysis by treatment groups from week 6 and week 7 (averaged)
Number of Responders Evaluated by Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) Scale by Treatments From the Double-blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: the double-blind treatment period

The CGI scale permits a global evaluation of the subject's improvement over time. During the Dose Optimization Period and the Double-Blind Treatment Period, the investigator assessed the subject's improvement relative to symptoms prior to dosing, using the CGI-I Scale.

For CGI-I scale, the responders are defined as subjects achieving a score of

  1. Very much improved or
  2. Much improved or

    The non-responders are defined as subjects achieving a score of

  3. Minimally improved on the clinician-rated CGI global improvement item or
  4. No change or
  5. Minimally worse or
  6. Much worse or
  7. Very much worse

Then the number of responders are calculated by treatment arms. Note: Week 6 is the first week of the double-blind treatment period, week 7 is the second week of the double-blind treatment period.

the double-blind treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Waxmonsky, MD, Not Affiliated

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

October 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on d-Amphetamine Transdermal Patch

3
Subscribe