Mechanics Analysis of Patients Having a Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA (Sigma MB TKA)

October 8, 2019 updated by: Richard Komistek, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

In Vivo Mechanics Analysis of Patients Having a Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA

Utilize previously developed mathematical model to determine in vivo knee mechanics (kinematics, forces, stresses, areas and sound) for subjects having a Sigma Posterior Stabilizing (PS) mobile bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are several hypotheses for this study, although the most prominent is: Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience polyethylene bearing rotation at 10 years post-operative, similar to their previous evaluations at six months, two years and five years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Additional hypotheses:

  • Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience full ideal femorotibial contact mechanics.
  • Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience optimal cam/post mechanics.
  • Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience continuous axial rotation in deep flexion.
  • Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience optimal distribution of tibio-femoral and cam/post contact forces over a broad area on the post.
  • Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience a smooth transition of the cam on the post, not an abrupt slide as seen with fixed bearing PS TKA.
  • The use of the sound sensors will detect cam/post contact mechanics under in vivo conditions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80210
        • Porter Adventist Hospital, Colorado Joint Replacement
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37996
        • Perkins Hall, The University of Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37996
        • Science and Engineering Research Facility, The University of Tennessee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients are eight mobile bearing subjects that were implanted over 10 years ago with a custom polyethylene insert that has four beads rigidly inserted into the polyethylene component.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least six months post-operative
  • Between 40-85 years of age
  • Have a body weight of less than 250 lbs.
  • Judged clinically successful with a AKS greater than 90
  • Have the DePuy Sigma mobile bearing TKA
  • Good-to-excellent post-operative passive flexion
  • Must be willing to sign the IC and HIPAA forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant females
  • Those not willing to sign the IC and HIPAA forms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA Beaded Poly
subjects implanted with the Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads
Sigma PS RP TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time Frame: 10 yrs post-operative
The values that were reported indicate the motion of the contact point from full extension to patient's maximum flexion. Throughout flexion, if the point translated forward (anteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as positive. If the point traveled backwards (posteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as negative.
10 yrs post-operative
Femoral Axial Rotation With Respect to the Tibia During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time Frame: 10 yrs post-operative
10 yrs post-operative
Range of Motion During Flexion of Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time Frame: 10 yrs post-operative
10 yrs post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time Frame: 10 yrs post-operative
The intended unit of measure is "times Body Weight" (or xBW), relating to a ratio.
10 yrs post-operative
Condyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time Frame: 10 yrs post-operative
10 yrs post-operative
Condyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time Frame: 10 yrs post-operative
10 yrs post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard D Komistek, Ph. D., The University of Tennessee
  • Principal Investigator: Dennis A Douglas, MD, Colorado Joint Replacement

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11019 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)
  • R01 1373 424 (Other Identifier: The University of Tennessee)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Replacement Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA Beaded Poly

Subscribe