Project ASPIRE Efficacy Pilot: Achieving Superior Parental Involvement for Rehabilitative Excellence (ASPIRE)

June 2, 2016 updated by: University of Chicago

A Parent-Directed, Multimedia Early Intervention Tool to Improve Outcomes in Underserved Children Who Are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing

The purpose of the proposed exploratory research protocol is to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of Project ASPIRE, a parent-directed intervention aiming to increase parental skills and enrich children's early language environments and ultimately improve child outcomes in children with hearing loss from low-income backgrounds.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We will test the curriculum's efficacy in increasing parental knowledge and skills with a pilot study funded by a U.S. Department of Education Institute for Education Sciences Goal 2 grant. We hypothesize that parents who complete the ASPIRE curriculum with an Early Intervention therapist will demonstrate enhanced understanding of their child's listening and language needs. This deeper understanding will support behavior changes that improve the language-learning environment through increased parental engagement and linguistic input. Knowledge increase and changes to the language environment will be apparent in comparative pre- vs. post-intervention assessment scores. In addition, child outcomes will demonstrate improved listening and spoken language trajectories.

To encourage behavior change and help parents track their progress, the curriculum will be coupled with "linguistic feedback" gathered by the Language Environment Analysis (LENA) recorders and software. With linguistic feedback, EI therapists and parents will be able to track the family's progress through skill building and set goals for behavior change. This feedback and goal setting will allow parents to translate their knowledge into behavior changes that enrich their child's early language environment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • The University of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child is under 4.5 years old
  • Child uses at least one amplification device (hearing aid, cochlear implant, BAHA)
  • Child has adequate amplification (at least 30 db in one ear)
  • Parent speaks conversational English
  • Family's communication choice includes spoken language
  • Family is considered low-SES according to income and education proxies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child is younger than 6 months of age
  • Parent does not speak conversational English
  • Child is over 4.5 years of age
  • Family is considered high-SES according to income and education proxies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Project ASPIRE Treatment Condition
The Project ASPIRE Treatment condition will receive the Project ASPIRE intervention program which includes the linguistic feedback reports and the multimedia education sessions. This group will complete the same assessments as the control group.
Throughout the study, parents will complete 16 total LENA recordings. The feedback report will include information on the parent's previous LENA recording(s), including the Adult Word Count (AWC), Conversational Turns (CTC), and TV Time (TVT). Parents in the treatment group will receive feedback reports for the baseline and 10 weekly recordings. Feedback reports will not be offered for the follow-up recordings
Treatment group parents will receive 10 weekly home visit sessions (e.g. the ASPIRE Program) with an interventionist during which time they will review multimedia education modules. The sessions include feedback report review, module discussion, video modeling, and goal setting activities. The education modules provide parents with information on supporting the development of listening and spoken language for children with hearing loss.
Other Names:
  • Home Visits
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: EI-As-Usual Condition
As an ethical decision, eligible participants may roll over to the experimental group after satisfactory completion of this treatment.
The EI-as-usual condition will parallel the treatment condition. Families in the EI-as-usual condition will continue to receive their usual therapy. They will not participate in Project ASPIRE home visits or receive feedback on their recordings. Families in this group will complete the same assessments as the families in the treatment group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parental Behavior Change - Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA): Quantitative Linguistic Change
Time Frame: 16 recordings total over a 6 month period: Baseline (3 Recordings), Weeks 1-10, Week 14, Week 18, Week 22
The Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system records the home audio environment of children with a recorder and processes the recording information with specialized computer software. Processed recordings provide information for researchers on the following adult language-related behaviors: Adult Word Count (AWC), Conversational Turn Count (CTC), Television Time (TVT), and Background Noise.
16 recordings total over a 6 month period: Baseline (3 Recordings), Weeks 1-10, Week 14, Week 18, Week 22
Child Behavior Change - LENA: Quantitative
Time Frame: 16 recordings over a 6 month period: Baseline (3 Recordings, approximately 1 per week for 3 weeks), Weeks 1-10, Week 14, Week 18, Week 22
The LENA system provides information about child language behaviors in addition to adult language behaviors, including data for Child Vocalization Count (CVC) and Conversational Turn Count (CTC).
16 recordings over a 6 month period: Baseline (3 Recordings, approximately 1 per week for 3 weeks), Weeks 1-10, Week 14, Week 18, Week 22

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Screen, short form (CESD-10)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
Validated brief depression screen for the parent. Parents who score above the cut score will be assessed for suicidal ideation and self harm. Appropriate referrals will be made following assessment.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
MacArthur Child Development Inventories (CDIs)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Parent self-report of child expressive vocabulary.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Scale of Parental Involvement and Self-Efficacy (SPISE)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Parent self-report that assesses of self-efficacy relating to involvement in children's development.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Early Intervention Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (EIPSES)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Parent self-report measure of self-efficacy relating to early intervention programs.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
ASPIRE Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
Questionnaire developed for use in the trial that assesses parent's knowledge of child development and hearing loss
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
Demographics
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention program
Questionnaire about family background; child development history; child hearing loss and hearing devices
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention program
Parent Stress Index (PSI)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
A self-report measure that assesses level of parenting-related stress
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
Little Ears
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Short questionnaire about child's level of listening and language development following cochlear implant or hearing aid activation.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention program
A questionnaire concerning the child's development.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention program
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
Parent report of potentially problematic child behaviors.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
Rosetti
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Questionnaire assessing child's current language development
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Capute Scales
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
Validated scales of child development.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention
Theories of Intelligence (TOI)
Time Frame: Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
6-item questionnaire that assesses entity and incremental theories of intelligence.
Approximately 3 weeks pre-intervention; 1 week post-intervention; 3 months post-intervention
Parental Behavior Change - LENA and Video: Qualitative Changes
Time Frame: Baseline (2 Visits), Week 10, Week 22
LENA transcription:MLU, type/token, syntactical complexity, gesture Video: gesture, "responsive parenting"
Baseline (2 Visits), Week 10, Week 22

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12-0125

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parental Language Behaviors

Clinical Trials on Linguistic Feedback Report

Subscribe