Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture

November 1, 2022 updated by: Harri Pakarinen, University of Oulu

Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture - A Randomized Clinical Trial

A one third of all ankle fractures are bi- or trimalleolar. Traditionally these fractures are treated by both medial and lateral osteosynthesis, sometimes accompanied by osteosynthesis of the posterior malleolus. There is significant evidence that fractures of the lateral malleolus can be treated conservatively if the medial side is stable. However, there isn't a single study comparing standard bi- or trimalleolar fixation with only medial side osteosynthesis and postoperative immobilization with a cast.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oulu, Finland, 90029
        • Oulu University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Weber B bi- or trimalleolar ankle fracture (fracture of the lateral and medial malleolus +/- posterior malleolus sized under 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs)
  • Age: 16 years or older
  • Voluntary
  • Operated within 7 days of the trauma
  • Able to walk unaided before the current trauma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Pilon fracture
  • Bilateral ankle fracture
  • Concomitant tibial fracture
  • Pathological fracture
  • Active infection around the ankle
  • A previous ankle fracture on either side
  • In trimalleolar fractures, posterior malleolus fracture sized over 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs
  • Inadequate co-operation
  • Permanent residence outside the catchment area of the study hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Unimalleolar Fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to unimalleolar fixation group and no fixation of the lateral side is performed.
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to unimalleolar fixation group and no fixation of the lateral side is performed.
Active Comparator: Bimalleolar Fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to bimalleolar fixation group i.e. additional fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture is performed.
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to bimalleolar fixation group i.e. additional fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture is performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Olerud-Molander Ankle Score
Time Frame: 2 years
A validated, condition-specific, patient-reported measure of ankle fracture symptoms. Range from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 2 years
FAOS, 5 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better function
2 years
A 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale for function and pain (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 years
Range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe pain
2 years
The RAND 36-Item Health Survey for health-related quality-of-life (RAND-36)
Time Frame: 2 years
8 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life
2 years
Talocrural joint congruence
Time Frame: At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years
Medial clear space < 4 mm and ≤ 1 mm wider than the superior clear space as measured between the lateral border of the medial malleolus and the medial border of the talus at the level of the talar dome.
At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years
Fracture healing
Time Frame: 2 years
Fracture union is considered complete when the fracture line disappeared and conversely, those fractures with a visible fracture line are deemed non-unions.
2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications and Harms
Time Frame: At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years
Treatment related complications and harms (i.e. wound infection, re-operations, deep vein trombhosis, plaster sore, wound healing problems)
At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Harri J Pakarinen, MD, PhD, AP, Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OYSnilkka-RCT4

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Unimalleolar fixation

3
Subscribe