- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01757951
Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture
November 1, 2022 updated by: Harri Pakarinen, University of Oulu
Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture - A Randomized Clinical Trial
A one third of all ankle fractures are bi- or trimalleolar.
Traditionally these fractures are treated by both medial and lateral osteosynthesis, sometimes accompanied by osteosynthesis of the posterior malleolus.
There is significant evidence that fractures of the lateral malleolus can be treated conservatively if the medial side is stable.
However, there isn't a single study comparing standard bi- or trimalleolar fixation with only medial side osteosynthesis and postoperative immobilization with a cast.
Study Overview
Status
Suspended
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
126
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oulu, Finland, 90029
- Oulu University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Weber B bi- or trimalleolar ankle fracture (fracture of the lateral and medial malleolus +/- posterior malleolus sized under 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs)
- Age: 16 years or older
- Voluntary
- Operated within 7 days of the trauma
- Able to walk unaided before the current trauma
Exclusion Criteria:
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Pilon fracture
- Bilateral ankle fracture
- Concomitant tibial fracture
- Pathological fracture
- Active infection around the ankle
- A previous ankle fracture on either side
- In trimalleolar fractures, posterior malleolus fracture sized over 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs
- Inadequate co-operation
- Permanent residence outside the catchment area of the study hospital
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Unimalleolar Fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test.
If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to unimalleolar fixation group and no fixation of the lateral side is performed.
|
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test.
If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to unimalleolar fixation group and no fixation of the lateral side is performed.
|
Active Comparator: Bimalleolar Fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test.
If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to bimalleolar fixation group i.e. additional fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture is performed.
|
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test.
If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to bimalleolar fixation group i.e. additional fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture is performed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Olerud-Molander Ankle Score
Time Frame: 2 years
|
A validated, condition-specific, patient-reported measure of ankle fracture symptoms.
Range from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
FAOS, 5 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better function
|
2 years
|
A 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale for function and pain (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe pain
|
2 years
|
The RAND 36-Item Health Survey for health-related quality-of-life (RAND-36)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
8 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life
|
2 years
|
Talocrural joint congruence
Time Frame: At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years
|
Medial clear space < 4 mm and ≤ 1 mm wider than the superior clear space as measured between the lateral border of the medial malleolus and the medial border of the talus at the level of the talar dome.
|
At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years
|
Fracture healing
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Fracture union is considered complete when the fracture line disappeared and conversely, those fractures with a visible fracture line are deemed non-unions.
|
2 years
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Complications and Harms
Time Frame: At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years
|
Treatment related complications and harms (i.e.
wound infection, re-operations, deep vein trombhosis, plaster sore, wound healing problems)
|
At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Harri J Pakarinen, MD, PhD, AP, Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 21, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
December 31, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 2, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 1, 2022
Last Verified
November 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OYSnilkka-RCT4
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Trauma
-
Humacyte, Inc.Active, not recruitingTrauma | Trauma Injury | Trauma, Multiple | Trauma BluntUkraine
-
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research...CompletedTrauma Injury | Trauma, MultipleTurkey
-
Wonju Severance Christian HospitalNational Research Foundation of KoreaRecruitingTrauma Injury | Trauma, MultipleKorea, Republic of
-
Rabin Medical CenterIsraeli Ministry of SecurityUnknown
-
University Hospital, AngersRecruiting
-
Chang, Steve S., M.D.Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital; Accumetrics, Inc.CompletedHead Injury Trauma BluntUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital; South-Eastern Norway Regional...RecruitingTrauma Injury | Trauma, Multiple | PolytraumaNorway
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisFrancophone Pediatric Resuscitation and Emergency Group (GFRUP)Completed
-
Fundacion Clinica Valle del LiliUniversity of Pittsburgh; Hospital Universitario del Valle Evaristo GarciaRecruitingTrauma | Trauma Injury | Trauma, MultipleColombia
Clinical Trials on Unimalleolar fixation
-
Medical Park Gaziantep HospitalMuğla Sıtkı Koçman University; Bahçeşehir UniversityCompletedRecurrence | Hernia, Inguinal | Hernia, Femoral | Inguinal Hernia, Indirect | Inguinal Hernia, Direct | Neuralgia, Atypical | Neuralgia, Ilioinguinal | Neuralgia, Iliohypogastric NerveTurkey
-
Medical Center HaaglandenLeiden University Medical CenterUnknownTrimalleolar Fracture | AO Weber C Fractures | Syndesmotic Stability | Open Reduction and Internal FixationNetherlands
-
Medical Center HaaglandenLeiden University Medical CenterUnknownTrimalleolar Fracture | Open Reduction and Internal Fixation | Posterior MalleolusNetherlands
-
University of OuluCompleted
-
Royal Infirmary of EdinburghCompletedAnkle Fracture - Medial MalleolusUnited Kingdom
-
University of WarwickDePuy International; University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustUnknown
-
Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School...UnknownTreatment | Postieror Malleolar Fracture
-
Brno University HospitalMasaryk UniversityRecruitingCatheter ComplicationsCzechia
-
University Hospital, BrestCompletedIntubation, IntratrachealFrance
-
Rasmus ElsøeAarhus University Hospital; Viborg Regional Hospital; Randers Regional Hospital; Regional Hospital Hjoerring and other collaboratorsRecruitingSurgery | Orthopedic Disorder | Patella FractureDenmark