Compare the Outcomes of XT and XEC Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-negative Luminal B Breast Cancer Patients

January 28, 2013 updated by: Liao Ning, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences

A Phase III,Randomized ,Multi-center Clinical Trail to Compare the Outcomes of XT and XEC Adjuvant Chemotherapy Protocol in HER-negative Luminal B Breast Cancer Patients Who Reached Pathologic Response After XT Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Human epidermalgrowth factor receptor-2(HER2) negative Luminal B subtype breast cancer patients are included. After 4 cycles of Capecitabine combined with Docetaxel(XT) protocol neoadjuvant chemotherapy ,those who reach partial response(PR) but not pathological complete response(pCR) are randomly divided into the group treated with XT protocol and the group with Capecitabine combined with Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide(XEC) protocol ,then compare the disease free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS) of two subgroup.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Individualized treatment of breast cancer has become one of the main directions in the clinical and research areas of breast cancer,and the individualized treatment of the estrogen receptor(ER) positive patients which covered 65% of total cases is of vital importance. Historical research showed that among the ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer,Luminal B breast cancer with Ki67>14% is more likely to be benefited from chemotherapy,compared with the Luminal A breast cancer with Ki67<14%. And the results of our previous research showed that, the neoadjuvant XT protocol has more than 17% pCR rate in Luminal B subtype breast cancer.However,to those who didn't reach pCR,we've got no evidence whether switching to Anthracycline-based post operative protocol can benefit them.So that,we sketch out a randomized controlled multicentric phase III clinical trail.HER2 negative Luminal B subtype breast cancer patients are included. After 4 cycles of XT protocol neoadjuvant chemotherapy ,those who reach PR but not pCR are randomly divided into the group treated with XT protocol and the group with XEC protocol ,then compare the DFS and OS of two subgroup.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

640

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HER2 negative Luminal B subtype breast cancer patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese population surgery patients with invasive breast cancer;
  • Stage II-III;
  • ER positive;
  • HER2 negative;
  • Ki67≥14%;
  • Aged between 18 and 70 years old;
  • The maximum diameter of the primary tumor greater than 1cm;
  • ECOG score 0-1 points; -Have adequate baseline bone marrow and organ function reserve : absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500/mm3, platelet count ≥ 8g/dl; the ≥ 100000/mm3 hemoglobin concentration and serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal ; aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase ≤ 2.5 times the upper limit of normal , bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal ; left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ) ≥ 50%

Exclusion Criteria: - Non - Chinese population of patients;

  • Non- invasive cancer patients;
  • Inflammatory Breast Cancer patients;
  • Metastatic breast cancer patients;
  • HER2 positive patients;
  • Ki67<14% patients;
  • No adequateBaseline bone marrow or organ function reserve;
  • ECOG PS score ≥ 2 points;
  • Younger than 18 years of age or greater than 70 years old;
  • Already accepted therapy including chemotherapy , endocrine therapy or targeted therapy before neoadjuvant treatment;
  • HER2-positive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 55 % can not receiving Herceptin;
  • Known allergy of docetaxel , capecitabine , epirubicin , ring phosphonamide .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
pCR,XT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease free survival after adjuvant chemotherapy within five years
Time Frame: Within 5 years after adjuvant chemotherapy
Within 5 years after adjuvant chemotherapy,we should evaluate disease free survival and overall survival rates as the most important outcome measure.
Within 5 years after adjuvant chemotherapy
Overall survival after adjuvant chemotherapy within five years
Time Frame: Within five years after adjuvant chemotherapy
Within 5 years after adjuvant chemotherapy,we should evaluate overall survival (OR)rates as the most important outcome measure.
Within five years after adjuvant chemotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Imaging evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame: within the 21 days after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
After neoadjuvant chemotherapy,we should evaluate the status of patients as progress disease and then use the imaging evaluations as the proofs to plan their next therapeutic schedule or different grouping methods.
within the 21 days after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline evaluation
Time Frame: before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Baseline evaluation includes the issues of ECOG PS scores, primary tumor Imaging evaluation, evaluation and reserve of bone marrow and organ function evaluation.
before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GGHBCRG

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 Negative Carcinoma of Breast

Subscribe