Minocycline for Schizophrenia (MINOS)

June 29, 2016 updated by: Abebaw Fekadu, MD, PhD, Addis Ababa University

A Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Adjuvant Therapy With Minocycline for Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is understood to be a heterogeneous brain condition with overlapping symptom dimensions. The negative symptom dimension, with its protean cognitive manifestations, responds poorly to treatment, which can be a particular challenge in countries where clozapine therapy is not available. Preliminary data indicates that minocycline may be beneficial adjunct in the treatment of schizophrenia: positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms. Persons with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and recent onset schizophrenic episode or recent relapse who are prescribed minocycline in addition to standard antipsychotic medication will show greater symptom reduction, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Minocycline has excellent penetration of the blood-brain barrier. In a mechanism that seems to be distinct from its antimicrobial properties, minocycline has anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. These properties are thought to be related to some combination of its inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS); caspase 1 and 3; p-38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK); cytochrome C release; cyclooxygenase-2 expression; prostaglandin E2 formation; and microglial activation. Minocycline has also been reported to have antiviral effects against HIV and antiprotozoal effects against Toxoplasma gondii.

Its use in individuals with schizophrenia has been encouraged by its effects in rodent models of this disorder. In one study, minocycline attenuated the behavioral changes following the administration of an NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate)antagonist in mice. In another study, minocycline reversed the effects of an NMDA antagonist in rats. Some preliminary data also suggest that minocycline may be useful in patients with schizophrenia. Two case report series have been published, one including two patients with schizophrenia and the other including three patients with recent-onset acute paranoid schizophrenia. An open label study of 22 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, using minocycline 150 mg/d for four weeks, reported an improvement in both positive and negative symptoms. Two double blind trials have been carried out. In one study, 73 patients with schizophrenia of less than five years' duration were randomized to minocycline 200 mg or placebo for 12 months: "all symptom measures improved significantly" especially in the negative symptoms. In the other study, 54 "early phase" (symptoms of less than five years) patients were randomized to minocycline 200 mg/d or placebo for six months; the authors reported a significant improvement in negative symptoms measured using Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) and a significant improvement in some test of executive function.

These initial findings encourage further replication. First, these studies are of comparatively small size. Second, in countries like Ethiopia where options for the treatment of schizophrenia are limited, identifying a safe alternative to clozapine is important. Related to this, most patients have limited exposure to psychotropic medications. Third, exposure to alcohol and substances is generally believed to be lower in the Ethiopian setting. Finally, given our hypothesis that infectious agents as a cause of schizophrenia may be more important in low and middle income countries (LAMICs) such as Ethiopia, minocycline may prove more useful. In this regard, the trial will help to explore the etiology of schizophrenia. The investigators have experience in following-up a large cohort of patients with schizophrenia and in conducting randomized controlled trials of a similar nature, which makes this proposed study feasible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
        • Amanuel Psychiatric Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 62 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-64 years
  • Primary Axis I diagnosis (DSM-IV) of schizophrenia, any subtype
  • The current episode should be either a relapse episode or a first onset schizophrenia and the duration of the relapse episode and first onset schizophrenia should be under five years
  • Indication of treatment-resistance defined by failure of at least on adequate dose of antipsychotic medication (equivalent to chlorpromazine of 200 mg/day or more) given for at least four weeks. For the minority of patients receiving second generation antipsychotic medications, adequate doses will be Risperidone 4mg/day, or Olanzapine 10mg/day.
  • Presence of at least moderate symptom severity measured according to the PANSS (score of at least 75)
  • On adequate dose of antipsychotic medication at entry and throughout the trial period except during medication switch when participant may take lower doses
  • Both genders, but women have to be of non-child bearing age because of potential risks to pregnant women, and the difficulty of ensuring contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Substance abuse co-morbidity or history of substance abuse/dependence within the previous three months
  • Impaired cognitive capacity because of a degenerative brain condition or trauma or diagnosis of mental retardation
  • Any serious medical condition that affects brain or cognitive function (e.g. epilepsy, serious head injury, brain tumor or other neurological and neurodegenerative conditions)
  • Any clinically significant or unstable medical disorder as determined by the investigators that would preclude study participation, including congestive heart failure, abnormal liver function or disease, renal impairment. Also patients with leucopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia will be excluded.
  • History of hypersensitivity to tetracycline
  • Patients on anticoagulant therapy
  • Patients requiring ergot alkaloids
  • Patients taking antacids containing aluminum, calcium or magnesium and iron containing products
  • Women of childbearing age (age 18-49 years)
  • Increased risk of suicide

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: minocycline
Subjects randomized to the minocycline group will take 2 tablets per day, each 100mg of minocycline, for a total daily dose of 200mg of minocycline.
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Subjects randomized to the placebo group will take 2 tablets of placebo (matched for minocycline) per day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score
Time Frame: baseline, week 12
Change in symptom severity from baseline to Week 12, as measured by the change in PANSS total score, compared between the treatment arms (minocycline vs. placebo)
baseline, week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abebaw Fekadu, MD, PhD, Addis Ababa University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe