Ondansetron for Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

September 28, 2015 updated by: Jocelyn Gravel, St. Justine's Hospital

Ondansetron for Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury; a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Most patients suffering from mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) present persistent symptoms at one week post injury. A systematic review showed a paucity of studies for short term outcomes following mTBI. Among potential treatments for mTBI, ondansetron has shown promising results based on clinical experience and a single retrospective study. Objectives: The primary objective of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of ondansetron to decrease post concussion symptoms at one week following mTBI in children. More specifically, this pilot study will evaluate the proportion of participants who complete assessment at one week following intervention. Method: This will be a randomized, double blinded, controlled trial performed among children aged between 8 and 17 years old who sustained a mTBI in the previous 24 hours. Participants visiting the emergency department will be randomized to receive one dose of either ondansetron or placebo. The primary outcome of interest is defined as an increase from pre-concussion baseline of at least 3 symptoms from the Post Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) one week following trauma. Secondary outcomes will include time to full recovery, mean PCSI score, and outcomes at one month following head trauma. The primary analysis will compare the proportion of participants with persistence of symptoms at one week in both groups. The full study sample size was calculated to have 90% power to detect a decrease in the proportion of persistence of symptoms from 50% to 30% with an alpha value of 0.05. Approximately 126 patients will therefore be recruited in each arm. The investigators plan to recruit 30 participants (10% of the final population) for the pilot study. Expected results: This pilot study should confirm the feasibility of the randomized controlled trial by showing that 90% of the recruited participants provide data on the primary outcome at one week following intervention. On the long term, the investigator expect that ondansetron will decrease the proportion of patients sustaining persistent symptoms of concussion from 50% to lower than 30%.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T1C5
        • CHU Sainte-Justine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 17 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children aged between 8 and 17 years old. This will be limited to this small spectrum of age to insure better homogeneity in the evaluation of the participants and streamlining of outcome measures. Also, this is the age group for which our measurement tool has been validated.
  2. Occurrence of a mTBI as defined by the presence of a head trauma, a Glasgow coma scale of 13 to 15 and at least one of the three following criteria4 :

    • Any period of loss of consciousness.
    • Any loss of memory for events immediately before or after the accident.
    • Any alteration in mental state at the time of the accident (eg, feeling dazed, disoriented).

    And the absence of the following criteria:

    • Post-traumatic amnesia greater than 24 hours.
    • Glasgow Coma Scale < 13, 30 minutes post accident.
  3. The trauma occurred in the preceding 24 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Inability to obtain a proper written informed consent (language barrier, absence of a parental authority, developmental delay, intoxication, patient too confuse to consent according to the treating physician).

    2. Known allergic reaction or intolerance to ondansetron. 3. Known rhythm or cardiac problem, or history of sudden death in the proximal family 4. Patients who are taking a medication which could increase the QT interval. 5. Patients who received ondansetron in the previous 24 hours 6. Any abnormality on radiological studies, including any bleeding in the brain or skull fracture.

    7. Multi-system injuries with treatment requiring admission to hospital or procedural sedation in the ED.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ondansetron
The intervention of interest will be the administration of one dose of oral ondansetron in the emergency department. The dosage will be 8 mg.
The intervention of interest will be the administration of one dose of oral ondansetron in the emergency department. The dosage will be 8 mg.
Other Names:
  • Zofran
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
The control group will receive a similar looking/ tasting pill of placebo.
placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Persistence of post concussive symptoms
Time Frame: 1 week post intervention
Persistence of post concussive symptoms will be defined by an increase from pre-concussion baseline of at least 3 symptoms of the Post Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI). The PCSI is a self-report tool evaluating the presence of 25 symptoms (on a 3-point likert scale) for children 8-12 and 26 symptoms on a (7-point likert scale) for children 13-17 years. An increase of two points or more from pre-injury in any symptom is considered clinically significant.
1 week post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean number of PCSI symptoms
Time Frame: one week and month following intervention
one week and month following intervention
Mean number of school days missed
Time Frame: one month following intervention
one month following intervention
Number of days of sport activity restriction
Time Frame: 1 month following intervention
1 month following intervention
Time before full recovery
Time Frame: One month following intervention
According to the parents
One month following intervention
Healthcare utilization
Time Frame: One month following intervention
Proportion of participants who consulted a health resource.
One month following intervention
Side effects
Time Frame: one week and month following intervention
Side effects will include, in addition to symptoms related to mTBI,proportion of participants who complained of diarrhea or constipation (binary answer).
one week and month following intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants who complete the assessment at one week following intervention
Time Frame: One week following intervention
the main objective of the pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of the randomized controlled trial. Accordingly, the primary outcome of the pilot study will be the proportion of participants who complete the assessment at one week following intervention
One week following intervention
Proportion of eligible children who were not included
Time Frame: At baseline
This is the proportion of eligible children who were not included and reasons for non-inclusion.
At baseline
Compliance with study medication
Time Frame: One week following intervention
Proportion of patients who tolerated their medication and proportion of patients randomized to the control group who received ondansetron
One week following intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jocelyn Gravel, MD, CHU Sainte-JUstine, University of Montreal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Ondansetron

3
Subscribe