COGNUTRIN in Breast Cancer Survivors

Pilot Clinical Trial of COGNUTRIN in Breast Cancer Survivors

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and influence of an intervention (COGNUTRIN) using nutritional supplements (n-3 fatty acids and blueberry anthocyanins) on cognitive performance in breast cancer survivors following chemotherapy. The investigators' goal is to treat or lessen the late effects of cancer treatment. The supplement to be used will be a combination of the following: (1) VitaBlue (40% polyphenolics, 12.5% anthocyanins from blueberries (BB) and (2) n-3 fatty acids - Lovaza.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Breast Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: VitaBlue™; Drug: Lovaza®; Other: Placebo

Detailed Description

This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of administration of the nutritional supplement and placebo in this patient population and performing cognitive function testing at baseline and post supplementation.

This is a randomized, double-blind pilot study of COGNUTRIN vs. Placebo.

Participants have an equal chance (like flipping a coin) of being in either of the study groups. Neither the participant nor the study doctor will be able to choose which study group the participant is in. Participants will not know and the study doctor will not know which study group the participants are in.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 36
• Phase: Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Florida
    • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
      • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Cases with Stage II-IIIA Breast Cancer that have completed adjuvant treatment with anthracyclines and/or taxanes + or -Radiation therapy within past 6 months(+/- 7 days) (subjects on concurrent endocrine therapy (TAM, Aromatase inhibitors are also eligible to participate as this is standard of care for this patient population)
• Able to understand and sign the informed consent
• Fluent in reading, comprehension and communication in the English language
• No evidence of dementia - Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) >=23 but some evidence of cognitive impairment
• Must be aware of the nature of his current medical condition and must be willing to give consent after being informed of the experimental nature of therapy, alternatives, potential benefits, side-effects, risks and discomforts
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0- 2 (Karnofsky score >60%)
• Acceptable hemoglobin and hematocrit level based on complete blood count (CBC)
• Must be willing to be monitored for adequacy of nutritional intake during the intervention, as is the current standard of clinical practice

Exclusion Criteria:

• Use of estrogens (oral, dermal or vaginal), progesterone (oral or topical), androgens, Raloxifene or Tamoxifen during the previous 3 months
• Use of over the counter steroid hormonal supplements including dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
• Patients with advanced or Stage IIIIB or IV breast cancer or other cancers
• Use of n-3 fatty acids or high dose antioxidant supplements other than what is provided in the trial
• History of known allergy to components of the study supplements
• Renal or liver disease
• Concurrent participation in another chemoprevention trial
• Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
• Metabolic abnormalities (e.g. thyroid disorders, insulin dependent diabetes, rheumatologic disease etc.)
• Known claustrophobia, presence of pacemaker and/or ferromagnetic material in their body that would prohibit MRI imaging
• Medical history of concussions
• Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or may interfere with interpretation of study results, and in the judgment of the investigator would make the potential participant inappropriate for entry into this study

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Triple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: COGNUTRIN (VITABLUE and n-3 fatty acids); Participants will be provided with two bottles containing Lovaza and VitaBlue. Participants will be asked to take 1 tablet of Lovaza two times a day and 1 tablet of VitaBlue three times a day.	Drug: VitaBlue™; Self administration of nutritional supplement COGNUTRIN for 3 months. The supplement to be used will be a combination of the following: (1) VitaBlue (40% polyphenolics, 12.5% anthocyanins from blueberries (BB) and (2) n-3 fatty acids - Lovaza.; Other Names: blueberry (BB) Anthocyanins; Drug: Lovaza®; Self administration of nutritional supplement COGNUTRIN for 3 months. The supplement to be used will be a combination of the following: (1) VitaBlue (40% polyphenolics, 12.5% anthocyanins from blueberries (BB) and (2) n-3 fatty acids - Lovaza.; Other Names: omega-3-acid ethyl esters
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Administration; Participants will be provided with two bottles containing placebo. Participants will be asked to take 1 tablet of one placebo two times a day and 1 tablet of other placebo three times a day.	Other: Placebo; Self administration of placebo for 3 months. Investigators use a placebo to make sure that it really is the study medicine that is making a difference in the participant's condition. It does not have anything in it that would normally help or harm most people.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Cognitive Function Scores With Intervention - HVLT and COWA	Mean change in cognitive function scores measured from baseline to post intervention with Cognutrin compared to placebo. Mean cognitive function scores by group and compared by time of testing (Time 1, Time 2). The HVLT test assesses verbal learning and memory. Subjects are given a list of words and asked to repeat as many words as they can recall at 3 times. There is no absolute low & high, as scores are age adjusted. Reported scores are T-scores- average score should be 50, with a standard deviation of 10. Any score below 50 indicates performance below population averages and any score above 50 indicates higher than population averages.The COWA test is a verbal fluency test that measures spontaneous production of words belonging to the same category or beginning with a designed letter. The scores are converted to z-scores. A Z score of -1 is 1 standard deviation below mean. The lowest and highest Z scores could be ≤ -3.0 and ≥3.0. A lower Z score is indicative of poor fluency.	Baseline (Time 1) and at 3 months +/- 7 days (Time 2)
Change in Cognitive Function Scores With Intervention - Color Trails 1 & 2	Mean change in cognitive function scores measured from baseline to post intervention with Cognutrin compared to placebo arms of the trial. Mean cognitive function scores by group and compared by time of testing (Time 1, Time 2). Tests: Color Trails 1 & Color Trails 2. Color Trails 1 consists of a page with scattered circles numbered from 1-25. Even numbered circles are colored yellow and odd numbered ones are colored pink. Respondents are instructed to connect the circles in consecutive numeric order with a continuous line as quickly as possible. Score is determined by recording the number of seconds required to complete the task. Color Trails 2 consists of a page containing 25 pink circles and 25 yellow circles numbered 1-60. Respondents are instructed to connect circles in consecutive order while alternating colors. A total score is determined by recording the number of seconds required to compete the task.	Baseline (Time 1) and at 3 months +/- 7 days (Time 2)
Change in Cognitive Function Scores With Intervention - Digit Span	Mean change in cognitive function scores measured from baseline to post intervention with Cognutrin compared to placebo. Mean cognitive function scores by group and compared by time of testing (Time 1, Time 2). The Digit Span assesses immediate verbal memory and auditory attention. The examiner reads increasingly longer series of numbers and the respondent is required to repeat them in the same order. The examiner then reads additional sequences of numbers and the respondent is required to repeat them in reverse order. Digit Span yields one score, number of items completed correctly. Scores are scaled from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The values for these scaled scores indicated that values from 1-7 indicate below average performance, corresponding to 1-16 percentile ranks. Scores between 8-12 indicate average performance, corresponding to percentile ranks of 25-75. Scores between 13-19 correspond to areas of strength and 84-99 percentile ranks.	Baseline (Time 1) and at 3 months +/- 7 days (Time 2)
Change in Cognitive Function Scores With Intervention - Symbol Digit Modalities Test	Mean change in cognitive function scores measured from baseline to post intervention with Cognutrin compared to placebo arms of the trial. Mean cognitive function scores by group and compared by time of testing (Time 1, Time 2). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test requires respondents to write the number that corresponds with each symbol for a series of 110 items in which the symbol but not the number appears. Respondents identify the correct number using a key provided in which symbols are matched with numbers. Total score is determined by calculating the number of items correctly completed in 90 seconds Scale uses z-scores which have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Scores cores above 0 indicate better than average performance whereas scores below 0 indicate poorer than average performance.	Baseline (Time 1) and at 3 months +/- 7 days (Time 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)	The primary safety endpoint is incidence and severity of AEs occurring during intervention with either COGNUTRIN or placebo. All AEs that are reported by the participant, detected during a visit, physical examination, or laboratory work-up will be recorded in the participant's medical record and recorded on the case report form (CRF). All AEs that occur after the informed consent is signed will be recorded on the AE CRF whether or not related to study agent, using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0.	3 months from baseline +/- 7 days
Occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs) by Causality	Number of Adverse events according to relation to study treatment category: Definitely related, Probably related, Possibly related, Unlikely to be related, Unrelated.	3 months from baseline +/- 7 days
Number of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events	The primary safety endpoint is incidence and severity of AEs occurring during intervention with either COGNUTRIN or placebo. All AEs that are reported by the subject, detected during a visit, physical examination, or laboratory work-up will be recorded in the participant's medical record and recorded on the case report form (CRF). All AEs that occur after the informed consent is signed will be recorded on the AE CRF whether or not related to study agent, using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0.	3 months from baseline +/- 7 days
Number of Participants With Improvement in Function MRI and Structural MRI Post-Intervention	Functional: Improved cortical activation in multiple areas of the brain on examination of functional MRI post study intervention. Imaging including: 1) Extended resting state functional MRI with data post-processed on Philips EWS. Performed with patient's eyes closed and minds wandering. 2) Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with effective slice thickness of 2.3mm. Post-processed on Philips EWS with color-coded DTI tractography images obtained, absolute FA calculations performed in 9 anatomic areas in both right and left brain with total of 18 FA values obtained per examination. Structural: Improved white matter signal changes which correlate with ischemic changes or microvascular ischemic changes, cortical atrophy, hippocampal atrophy, brain volume and gray-white matter ratio. Anatomic sequences including: 1) Coronal 3-D volume T1 weighted gradient echo images with effective slice thickness of 1mm. 2) Axial FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery)	3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Plasma Cytokines	Mean change plasma cytokines from baseline to post intervention with Cognutrin vs. placebo. Inflammatory markers-Cytokines were measured with a panel including IFN-g, IL-6, IL-8 and INF-alpha.	3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
• Collaborators: University of South Florida; Gateway for Cancer Research

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• Moffitt Cancer Center Clinical Trials website

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 30, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 5, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): May 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 1, 2013
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 1, 2013
• First Posted (Estimate): April 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 14, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 30, 2020
• Last Verified: June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: n-3 fatty acids; polyphenolics; anthocyanins
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Skin Diseases; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Breast Diseases; Breast Neoplasms
• Other Study ID Numbers: MCC-17089

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No