Efficacy of Surgical Preparation Solutions in Knee Surgery

The goal of this study is to determine the superiority of surgical scrub preparations in total knee arthroplasty based on the bacterial counts present on the skin surface and in the deep joint tissues. These counts will be obtained by culturing the skin prior to any scrub preparation, post preparation after the application of the sterile drapes, deep joint tissue sample prior to wound closure, and immediately post wound closure. This study will provide an assessment of the management of sterility by comparing quantitative and qualitative cultures immediately after surgical scrub preparation and the maintenance of sterility throughout the procedure. This study will enhance prior research efforts by contributing quantitative bacterial load and bacterial load within the surgical wound at closure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Prospective randomized study of commonly used surgical prep solutions comparing superiority of Chloraprep to Duraprep

  • Primary Outcome Measure: Quantitative and qualitative bacterial load pre-surgical preparation, post-surgical preparation, and post-wound closure to be obtained by skin cultures and one deep joint tissue culture from the joint space prior to wound closure.
  • Secondary Outcome Measure: Rates of surgical site infection in ChloraPrep and DuraPrep groups to be outlined below.

Patient Population:

Subjects will be recruited from Dr. Brindley's and Dr. Jenkins clinic which are selected for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Inclusion criteria:

  • >18 years old and less than 89
  • Undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Not undergoing surgical intervention for infection

Exclusion criteria:

  • Injury due to trauma
  • Open wound at the incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Abrasion in the vicinity of the planned incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection at or near the surgical incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection somewhere else in the body determined by pre-op labs and history and physical
  • Prior history of surgical infection or bacteremia determined by pre-op history and physical
  • History of rheumatoid arthritis determined by pre-op history and physical
  • History of autoimmune disorder determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Immunosuppressed patient determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Known allergy to iodine, isopropyl alcohol or Chlorhexidine

Subject recruitment:

A total of 120 patients will be recruited to participate in the study upon consent for surgical intervention based on the calculation to see a statistical difference in culture results between duraprep and chloraprep. Please see the statistical analysis section for details on the justification of recruiting 120 patients. All patients undergoing total knee primary operation will be considered consecutively for the study. Patients will receive no undue influence or incentive to participate in this study.

Study Procedure:

Patients will be sent to the OR with a randomized folder pre-made by a computer program (Stata Version 12 College Station, TX) that will provide randomization after the patient is enrolled in the study containing a paper stating the surgical prep solution to be used. On the cover of the folder will be a sheet of paper with the following information to be filled out and returned to the research coordinator. See Attachment

  • Patient randomized identification number
  • Check box for Chloraprep or Duraprep - to be checked after opening sealed folder
  • Start time of prep
  • End time of prep
  • Instructions on how, where and when to take the 8 separate cultures and 1 tissue sample
  • Check boxes to ensure that cultures were finished and sent to the lab
  • Incision start time
  • Surgery end time

Chloraprep vs. Duraprep

A. Pre Operative standard of Care:

Perioperative Antibiotics: All patients to receive Standard preoperative antibiotics per institution protocol and the same type of non-microbial drape will be used for all cases according to Dr. Brindley's standard protocol for surgery. Patients will receive 1 or 2g of cefazolin (based on weight) prior to surgery unless they have an allergy to penicillin, in which case they will receive 900mg of clindamycin.

B. Skin Preparation

  1. Patients enrolled in the study will be randomized at the time of enrollment for surgery to be treated with one of two widely used Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, surgical skin preparation solutions: ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol; Enturia, El Paso, Texas) or DuraPrep (0.7% available iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol; 3MHealthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota). The agent used for each patient will be determined immediately prior to skin preparation by opening a sealed, randomly-assigned envelope that will state the prep to be used. Due to the unique shapes and colors of each scrub it is not feasible to cover the label of each prep used for randomization. The surgical site will be prepped in the usual sterile fashion using 2 sticks of either ChloraPrep or DuraPrep. Each operating room will contain enough for 4 sticks for unforeseen errors (dropping the prep solution during surgical site preparation or patients' body habitus, etc.).
  2. Randomization Folders will have a label including:

i. Patient randomized ID ii. Check box for Duraprep or Chloraprep iii. Starting time of prep and end time of prep iv. Time of start of surgery (Each scrub solution has a set time to dry on it's label and this will document that each scrub was allowed to dry for the appropriate time before the start of surgery. Chloraprep 3 min::::Duraprep 3 min)

C. Knee sites: 1. Midline anterior patella 2. Midline - popliteal area Please See Attachment - Flyer for instruction on culture sites

  1. First Culture from native skin (specimens from sites 1 and 2) - To be taken at time of consent at the History and Physical pre-surgery visit by those educated on the study which includes residents, research coordinator, or holding room/pre-op nurses/ staff prior to any sterile agents being used including alcohol wipes and chlorhexidine baths.
  2. Second culture(specimens from sites 1 and 2)- to be taken in the OR before the surgical prep solutions are applied, but after the pre-op surgical scrub is done.
  3. Third Culture (specimens from sites 1 and 2) - To be taken after application of Duraprep or Chloraprep after waiting appropriate timing (3 minutes) and before application of the sterile drapes Tissue Culture (one specimen) - To be taken as a tissue sample from within 1 cm of the lateral side of the patella/patellar implant. Will be excised using a scalpel. This tissue sample will be weighed and homogenized to provide quantitative and qualitative cultures.
  4. Fourth Culture (specimens from sites 1 and 2) - To be taken after the final closure of the wound and before removal of the sterile drapes. Culture must be taken within 1cm of the incision.

Total of 9 cultures per participant

Method to Obtain Cultures - Primary surgeon, resident surgeons and holding room nurses will be educated and utilized to obtain cultures. Each culture will be taken from a 17x17mm square area (The length of the culture brush) area on the skin at each site to provide a standardized area for quantitative cultures. A neutralizing solution will be used prior to taking the culture to stop the killing action of the chlorhexidine and duraprep in order to provide accurate results at the time of culture. The neutralizing solution formula is based from the study by Savage et al [10] and is outlined below. Cultures will be marked for identification based on site and time of culture, then placed in an envelope with the patient's randomized ID. The culture folder will then be delivered to Dr. Hamood's microbiology lab located on the TTUHSC campus.

Neutralizing solution quoted from Savage et al [10]

  • The swab was then placed in a sealed sterile transport container and was immediately brought to the microbiology laboratory at our institution. All cultures were monitored for seven days.
  • The ChloraPrep sampling (neutralizing) solution consisted of 0.04% monobasic potassium phosphate, 1.01% dibasic sodium phosphate, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.0% polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80), 0.3% lecithin, and 1.0% Tamol. The DuraPrep sampling (neutralizing) solution consisted of 0.04% monobasic potassium phosphate, 1.01% dibasic sodium phosphate, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.2% sodium thiosulfate. The pH of each solution was adjusted to 7.9 ± 0.1 prior to dispensing into water dilution bottles and steam sterilizing for twenty minutes at 121_C. An independent contract laboratory (Microbiotest, Sterling, Virginia) formulated and tested the neutralization solutions and found that they were both effective and nontoxic.

D. Culture Analysis Dr. Colmer-Hamood and/or student to be trained by Dr. Colmer-Hamood will receive the samples, prepare the specimens for quantitative culture, and plate each specimen for quantitation of aerobic and anaerobic growth. Tissue samples will be ground in 1 ml of sterile broth to evenly distribute any microorganisms present and allow quantitative culture. Cultures will be monitored for 7 days post-inoculation, due to the average time required for detection of Propionibacterium acnes first growth being 5.1 days [1]. All colonies will be counted and each morphotype will be sub-cultured for identification. Standard Total bacterial load in colony forming units (CFU) will be calculated per mm2 of skin swabbed or gm of tissue. CFU for individual species will also be calculated. Results will be documented on our data collection form and reviewed.

E. Data Reporting Data will reported from Dr. Colmer-Hamood's lab including quantitative and qualitative bacteria connected to the patient's randomized number. This data will be stored on a password protected workstation at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center campus in Lubbock, Texas.

Data will also be taken from the medical record based of on history and physical preoperative and postoperative evaluations. Patients will be monitored for 3 months post operatively for wound infections. These wound infections will be reported in the study, but the incidence between the two surgical prep solutions will not be calculated due to the number of patients required to meet statistical power. We will follow the CDC's definitions of surgical site infections (SSIs) in reporting data [12].

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Lubbock, Texas, United States, 79430
        • Texas Tech University Health Science Center Orthopaedic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years old and less than 89
  • Undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Not undergoing surgical intervention for infection

Exclusion Criteria:

Injury due to trauma

  • Open wound at the incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Abrasion in the vicinity of the planned incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection at or near the surgical incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection somewhere else in the body determined by pre-op labs and history and physical
  • Prior history of surgical infection or bacteremia determined by pre-op history and physical
  • History of rheumatoid arthritis determined by pre-op history and physical
  • History of autoimmune disorder determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Immunosuppressed patient determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Known allergy to iodine, isopropyl alcohol or Chlorhexidine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Chlora Prep
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, surgical skin preparation solution: ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol; Enturia, El Paso, Texas)
Surgical Scrub skin preparation
Other Names:
  • 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol
Active Comparator: Dura Prep
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, surgical skin preparation solution:DuraPrep (0.7% available iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol; 3MHealthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota).
Surgical Scrub skin preparation
Other Names:
  • 0.7% available iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative and qualitative bacterial load
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Quantitative and qualitative bacterial load will be obtained by skin cultures and one deep joint tissue culture from the joint space prior to wound closure in primary and revision total knee surgeries.
At time of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of surgical site infections
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Rate of surgical site infections in chloraprep and duraprep groups.
at time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: George W Brindley, MD, Texas Tech University Health Science Center Orthopaedic Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement

Clinical Trials on Chlora Prep

3
Subscribe