Monitoring and Management for Metabolic Side Effects of Antipsychotics (AMMP)

February 7, 2019 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Monitoring and Management for Metabolic Effects of Antipsychotics

The purpose of this study is to test an approach for implementing guideline recommendations for assessing and managing metabolic side effects (including weight gain, diabetes, elevated lipids) in patients prescribed antipsychotic medications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Treatment of psychotic disorders consists primarily of antipsychotic medications, which are associated with metabolic side effects such as overweight/obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations have been developed for assessment and management of these conditions; however, research studies show deficits and delays in metabolic monitoring for patients prescribed antipsychotics. This purpose of this study is to test a quality improvement intervention to enhance implementation of recommendations for assessing and managing metabolic side effects in patients prescribed antipsychotic medications.

Study Objectives are:

  • Objective 1: To test the effect of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement/Facilitation (EBQI/F) intervention as an augmentation to a national implementation initiative on rates of monitoring for metabolic side effects of antipsychotics in sites likely to encounter greater challenges to implementation.
  • Objective 2: To test the effect of the EBQI/F intervention as an augmentation to the national implementation initiative on management of metabolic side effects of antipsychotics in sites likely to encounter greater challenges to implementation.
  • Objective 3: To assess the direct costs of the EBQI/F intervention, and explore potential variations in costs of the EBQI/F intervention in sites with lower versus higher organizational challenges.

Methods This study employs a cluster randomized design with eligible study sites including VA Medical Centers with 300 patients receiving a new antipsychotic prescription in the first six months of Fiscal Year 2008. Twelve sites have been recruited and matched according to level of organizational readiness-to-change. Randomization to intervention or control group was conducted within each of the six site-pairs. Study participants include VA employees involved in the monitoring and management of patients treated with antipsychotics at participating sites. The intervention involves researchers partnering with clinical stakeholders, offering tailoring in local implementation strategies to address barriers to metabolic side-effect monitoring and management. External facilitation to support, problem-solve and refine implementation will be provided for a six-month implementation phase. The effectiveness of the EBQI/F intervention combined with the ongoing national quality improvement initiative at six sites (intervention sites) will be compared to six matched comparison sites exposed to the national quality improvement initiative alone (control sites).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72114-1706
        • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Center, Little Rock, AR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Providers involved in antipsychotic management or management of metabolic side effects and related conditions

Exclusion Criteria:

- None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Evidence-Based Quality Improvement plus external facilitation to promote uptake of quality improvement tools and improvement strategies available as part of a national initiative (the MIAMI Project) to disseminate recommendations, tools, and improvement strategies relevant to metabolic monitoring and management.
The intervention involves researchers partnering with clinical stakeholders, offering tailoring in local implementation strategies to address barriers to metabolic side-effect monitoring and management. External facilitation to support, problem-solve and refine implementation will be provided for a six-month implementation phase.
Other Names:
  • EBQI/F
No Intervention: Comparison
"Usual care," in the context of the MIAMI Project.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Site-level Rates of Weight Monitoring at Baseline (Within 30 Days of a New Antipsychotic Prescription)
Time Frame: Change in monitoring rates will be measured monthly through 6-month pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainability phases
For each monthly observation: The proportion of patients at each site due for weight monitoring at baseline who have weight recorded in the electronic health record.
Change in monitoring rates will be measured monthly through 6-month pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainability phases

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Site-level Rates of Weight Monitoring at Follow-up (From 31-120 Days After a New Antipsychotic Prescription)
Time Frame: Change in monitoring rates will be measured monthly through 6-month pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainability phases
For each monthly observation: The proportion of patients at each site due for weight monitoring at follow-up who have weight recorded in the electronic health record.
Change in monitoring rates will be measured monthly through 6-month pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainability phases
Change in Site-level Rates of Management for Obesity or Weight Gain Within 30 Days After a Recording of 5% Gain in Body Weight
Time Frame: Change in weight management rates will be measured monthly through 6-month pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainability phases
For each monthly observation: The proportion of patients at each site with weight gain that have guideline-recommended weight management (e.g., counseling about diet or exercise, referral to weight management program) initiated within 30 days.
Change in weight management rates will be measured monthly through 6-month pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainability phases

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard R. Owen, MD, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Center, Little Rock, AR

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders

Clinical Trials on Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Plus Facilitation

Subscribe