- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01880164
Cost Effectiveness of Nonoperative Management for Adult Spinal Deformity (HEO)
April 4, 2017 updated by: Shay Bess
Cost Effectiveness of Nonoperative Management for Adult Spinal Deformity Associated With Low Grade Scoliosis: A Prospective Pilot Study to Evaluate Disease Burden and Longitudinal Study Feasibility
Quantify the efficacy and cost of nonoperative treatment modalities used for adult spinal deformity.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
- Identify disease burden associated with adult spinal deformity (ASD) using quality adjusted life year (QALY) analysis.
- Identify disease burden of specific demographic and radiographic features associated with ASD.
- Compare disease burden of ASD to other musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal diseases.
- Identify efficacy of specific nonoperative treatment modalities to treat ASD and identify specific clinical and radiographic features of ASD responsive to nonoperative treatment modalities.
- Compare QALY and ICER values for different ASD nonoperative treatment modalities to previously established QALY and ICER for values for operative and nonoperative treatment modalities for degenerative hip and knee disease, coronary artery disease, insulin dependent diabetes, and hypertension.
- Evaluate the cost and work hours associated with data collection and minimum 85% patient follow up.
- Evaluate patient characteristics associated with poor patient compliance for study follow up including demographic, radiographic and HRQOL values and for reasons for cross-over to operative treatment for ASD.
- Establish standardized data collection methodology for economic based outcome studies based upon patient demographics and HRQOL values.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
21
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- University of California - Davis
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- University of California - San Francisco Medical Center
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80205
- Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center
-
-
Missouri
-
St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University at St. Louis
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
- Hospital For Special Surgery
-
New York, New York, United States, 10010
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Oregon Health Sciences University
-
-
Virginia
-
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
- University of Virginia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Adult spinal deformity patients
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 40-75 years of age at the time of enrollment.
- ODI ≥30
- Adult degenerative or idiopathic lumbar scoliosis 10-40° as measured by the Cobb angle technique
- Sagittal plane deformity by SRS Schwab classification with at least one modifier ++ or two modifiers + and associated coronal cobb of at least 10 degrees
Exclusion Criteria:
- Adult degenerative or idiopathic scoliosis with a curvature of the spine measuring <10 degrees or >40 degrees
- Diagnosis of scoliosis other than degenerative or idiopathic (i.e. neuromuscular, congenital, etc.)
- Cardiopulmonary disease or comorbidities that preclude surgical intervention
- Patient not deemed surgical candidate by treating surgeon
- Patient unwilling to commit to monthly phone interviews or completion of necessary questionnaires or inability to return for defined follow up time points. Patients unwilling to comply with study protocol will not be offered enrollment into the study, regardless of meeting inclusion criteria.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Nonoperative
Adult spinal deformity (degenerative or idiopathic) with an ODI of 30 or greater
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Initial visit and six months post enrollment
|
This questionnaire has been designed to provide information as to how back pain affects ability to manage in everyday life.
Score must be equal to or greater than 30 for eligibility to enroll.
|
Initial visit and six months post enrollment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Radiographs
Time Frame: Initial visit (Day 1)
|
Coronal and sagittal radiographic views of the spine obtained to assess coronal curvature and sagittal balance.
|
Initial visit (Day 1)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
SRS22r
Time Frame: Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
Assess pain, function, self image, and mental health.
|
Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
EQ5D-3L
Time Frame: Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
Assess health state (best imaginable vs worst imaginable).
|
Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI:SHP)
Time Frame: Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
Assess ability to work and perform regular activities as relates to spinal deformity.
|
Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
NRS
Time Frame: Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
Assess back and leg pain.
|
Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
|
Resource Utilization (RRU)
Time Frame: Initial clinic visit (Day1) , Phone interviews at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months, and 6 months clinic visit
|
Document nonoperative treatment modalities, such as observation only, pain medicine, physical therapy, chiropractic care, injections, diagnostic radiology, emergency visits, and other therapies.
Analysis of this data will determine cost associated with nonoperative care for adult spinal disorders.
|
Initial clinic visit (Day1) , Phone interviews at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months, and 6 months clinic visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shay Bess, MD, Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):917-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.917.
- Avorn J. Debate about funding comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1927-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0902427. No abstract available.
- Baldus C, Bridwell KH, Harrast J, Edwards C 2nd, Glassman S, Horton W, Lenke LG, Lowe T, Mardjetko S, Ondra S, Schwab F, Shaffrey C. Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2214-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0466.
- Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, Hu SS, Bradford DS. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):2164-9; discussion 2169. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084666.53553.D6.
- Bonham AC, Rich EC, Davis DA, Longnecker DE, Heinig SJ. Commentary: Putting evidence to work: an expanded research agenda for academic medicine in the era of health care reform. Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10):1551-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181effdbc.
- Bridwell KH, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton WC 3rd, Lenke LG, Schwab F, Baldus C, Shainline M. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2220-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf120.
- Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C, Wootten D. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2171-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a8fdc8.
- Carter OD, Haynes SG. Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Dec;16(4):537-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.4.537.
- Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1259-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.338.
- Everett CR, Patel RK. A systematic literature review of nonsurgical treatment in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19 Suppl):S130-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134ea88.
- Garber AM, Tunis SR. Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine? N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1925-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0901355. No abstract available.
- Garrison KR, Donell S, Ryder J, Shemilt I, Mugford M, Harvey I, Song F. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins in the non-healing of fractures and spinal fusion: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2007 Aug;11(30):1-150, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11300.
- Glassman SD, Berven S, Kostuik J, Dimar JR, Horton WC, Bridwell K. Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 15;31(8):941-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000209318.32148.8b.
- Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96.
- Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Shaffrey CI, Polly DW, Ondra SL, Berven SH, Bridwell KH. The costs and benefits of nonoperative management for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):578-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0f2f8.
- Glassman SD, Polly DW, Dimar JR, Carreon LY. The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at 5 years after surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 20;37(9):769-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e03099.
- Hirth RA, Bloom BS, Chernew ME, Fendrick AM. Patient, physician, and payer perceptions and misperceptions of willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Winter;16(1):35-49. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300016147.
- Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, Fendrick AM, Weissert WG. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard. Med Decis Making. 2000 Jul-Sep;20(3):332-42. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000310.
- Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):E599-606. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aad219.
- Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1572-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817886a2.
- Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):473-81.
- Loomes G, McKenzie L. The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(4):299-308. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90030-0.
- Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):656-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.656. Erratum In: JAMA. 2008 Jun 11;299(22):2630.
- McCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(9):733-44. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00004.
- Perennou D, Marcelli C, Herisson C, Simon L. Adult lumbar scoliosis. Epidemiologic aspects in a low-back pain population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jan 15;19(2):123-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00001.
- Ridyard CH, Hughes DA. Methods for the collection of resource use data within clinical trials: a systematic review of studies funded by the UK Health Technology Assessment program. Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):867-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00788.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
- Rihn JA, Berven S, Allen T, Phillips FM, Currier BL, Glassman SD, Nash DB, Mick C, Crockard A, Albert TJ. Defining value in spine care. Am J Med Qual. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl):4S-14S. doi: 10.1177/1062860609349214.
- Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996 Oct 9;276(14):1172-7.
- Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, Farcy JP. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd.
- Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1828-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08.
- Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, Ondra S, Schwab F, Shainline M, Fu KM, Bridwell K; Spinal Deformity Study Group. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):1693-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac5fcd.
- Testa MA, Nackley JF. Methods for quality-of-life studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:535-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.002535.
- Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2.
- Tosteson AN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Herkowitz H, Albert T, Boden SD, Bridwell K, Longley M, Andersson GB, Blood EA, Grove MR, Weinstein JN; SPORT Investigators. Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):845-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00003.
- Tosteson AN, Skinner JS, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Andersson GB, Berven S, Grove MR, Hanscom B, Blood EA, Weinstein JN. The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2108-15. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318182e390.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2017
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
April 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 17, 2013
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
June 18, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
April 6, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 4, 2017
Last Verified
April 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2108
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Deformity
-
UMC UtrechtNuVasiveCompletedInstrumented Spinal Fusion | Spinal Deformity | Spinal InstabilityNetherlands
-
Growing Spine Study GroupGrowing Spine FoundationCompletedEarly Onset Scoliosis | Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome | Congenital Spinal Deformities | Infantile Idiopathic Scoliosis | Neuromuscular Spinal Deformity | Syndromic Spinal DeformityUnited States, Canada, United Kingdom, Egypt, Ghana, Spain, Turkey
-
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord AquitaineBard LtdRecruitingSpinal Fusion | Hemostasis | Spinal Deformity | HemostaticsFrance
-
The University of Hong KongUniversity of Malaya; Peking University Third Hospital; Huashan Hospital; Hamamatsu... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpinal DeformityHong Kong
-
Federal University of PiauiNot yet recruitingSpinal Fusion | Spine Injury | Spinal DeformityBrazil
-
Istituto Scientifico Italiano Colonna VertebraleRecruitingSpinal Deformity | Adherence, TreatmentItaly
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenActive, not recruitingSpinal DeformityBelgium
-
AO Foundation, AO SpineCompletedSpinal DeformityUnited States, Turkey, Hong Kong, United Kingdom, China, Australia, Netherlands, Canada, Japan, Brazil, India, Israel, Pakistan, Spain
-
International Spine Study Group FoundationNuVasiveRecruitingScoliosis | Kyphosis | Adult Spinal Deformity | Sagittal ImbalanceUnited States
-
International Spine Study Group FoundationMedtronic; Globus Medical Inc; SI-BONE, Inc.RecruitingScoliosis | Kyphosis | Adult Spinal Deformity | Sagittal ImbalanceUnited States, Canada