Dendritic Cell Vaccination in Patients With Lynch Syndrome or Colorectal Cancer With MSI

Objectives:

In this Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) initiated study our first objective is to investigate toxicity (safety and feasibility) of vaccination with frameshift-derived neoantigen-loaded DC of CRC patients with an MSI-positive CRC and persons who are known to be carrier of a germline MMR-gene mutation with no signs of disease yet.

The secondary objectives of the study are:

• to demonstrate that peptide-loaded DC can induce or enhance an immune response to tumor-associated antigen CEA and specific frameshift-derived neoantigens in the study population.
• to study the pathological and clinical responses, e.g. disease-free survival, determined according to the standard protocol.

Study design:

This study is a phase I/II open-label study.

Study population:

Two groups of adults will be vaccinated:

Group I) CRC patients, who are known to carry a germline MMR-gene mutation and patients with an MSI-positive CRC and yet unknown or negative MMR-gene mutation status.

Group II) persons who are known to be carrier of a germline MMR-gene mutation with no signs of disease yet. All participants need to be HLA-A2.1 positive.

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Colorectal Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Biological: DC vaccination

Detailed Description

Rationale of this study:

Ex vivo generated and tumor-antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) are currently used in clinical vaccination protocols in cancer patients. DC vaccines are safe, with minimal side effects. Evaluating more than 200 patients treated the past ten years we found that clinical responses measured in several patients directly coincide with specific cytotoxic T cell responses. The majority of studies investigated the therapeutic effects of DC vaccines in late-stage cancer patients with metastasis. In these (heavily) pretreated patients the immune system is compromised. Based on our observations that a specific immune response is indicative for a good clinical outcome we believe that the full potential of these immunostimulatory cells has to be exploited in high-risk patients with low tumor burden or in a precancerous state.

A good clinical model are carriers of a germline mutation in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, such as patients with Lynch syndrome (also known as Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer or HNPCC). These persons have a lifetime risk of 60-80% for colorectal cancer that has developed within a few years from a precancerous adenoma. The immune system is thought to be of potential great importance as the colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome is characterized by a strong lymphocyte infiltration, even at the stage of adenomas. In affected cancer lesions, MMR dysfunction results in frameshift mutations at short, repetitive DNA sequences referred to as microsatellites. In coding regions these mutations destroy gene function and have been demonstrated to lead to the production of neopeptides. These neopeptides are: 1) tumor specific, because frameshift mutations only occur in tumor cells and their premalignant progenitors, 2) are very similar between patients, since the same genes are affected by the mismatch repair defect and 3) immunogenic, since cytotoxic T cells (CTL) and helper T cells could be induced in vitro from blood of patients with Lynch syndrome. Similar mechanisms occur in sporadic colon cancer with MMR dysfunction, which represents about 10-15% of all colorectal 2.

Objectives:

In this Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) initiated study our first objective is to investigate toxicity (safety and feasibility) of vaccination with frameshift-derived neoantigen-loaded DC of CRC patients with an MSI-positive CRC and persons who are known to be carrier of a germline MMR-gene mutation with no signs of disease yet.

The secondary objectives of the study are to demonstrate that peptide-loaded DC can induce or enhance an immune response to tumor-associated antigen CEA and specific frameshift-derived neoantigens in the study population. And we want to study the pathological and clinical responses, e.g. disease-free survival, determined according to the standard protocol.

Study design:

This study is a phase I/II open-label study.

Study population:

Two groups of adults will be vaccinated:

Group I) CRC patients, who are known to carry a germline MMR-gene mutation and patients with an MSI-positive CRC and yet unknown or negative MMR-gene mutation status.

Group II) persons who are known to be carrier of a germline MMR-gene mutation with no signs of disease yet. All participants need to be HLA-A2.1 positive.

Main study endpoints:

The first objective of this study is to toxicity (safety and feasibility) of vaccination with frameshift-derived neoantigen-loaded DC. This will be measured by recording of the adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

The secondary objectives of the study are to demonstrate that peptide-loaded DC can induce or enhance an immune response to tumor-associated antigen CEA and specific frameshift-derived neoantigens in the study population. Immune responses will be assessed as:

• proliferative and humoral response to KLH
• cytokine production of KLH stimulated PBMC
• tumor antigen-specific T cell responses in peripheral blood
• tumor antigen-specific T cell responses in biopsies from DTH
• cytokine production of T cells in biopsies from DTH
• cytotoxicity of T cells in biopsies from DTH
• immunohistochemical characterization of DTH infiltrating lymphocytes

The pathological and clinical responses, e.g. disease-free survival, will be determined according to the standard protocol.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 25
• Phase: Phase 2; Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Netherlands
  • Gelderland
    • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB
      • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• histologically documented evidence of CRC (group I) and Lynch syndrome carrier without signs of disease (group II)
• HLA-A2.1 phenotype is required
• MSI high tumor
• WBC >3.0 x 109/l, lymphocytes >0.8 x 109/l, platelets >100 x 109/l, serum crea¬tinine <150 µmol/l, serum bilirubin <25 µmol/l
• WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky 100-70%)
• Age 18-75 years
• Expected adequacy of follow-up
• Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of malignancy in the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
• Serious active infections, HbsAg or HIV positive (test only in case of high risk or clinical suspicion)
• Autoimmune diseases or organ allografts
• Concomitant use of immunosuppressive drugs
• Known allergy to shell fish
• Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MSI-positive CRC patients; I) Adjuvant DC vaccinations for MSI-positive CRC patients (n=5)	Biological: DC vaccination; DC vaccination
Experimental: Carriers of germline MMR-gene mutation; II) Preventive DC vaccinations for carriers of germline MMR-gene mutation (n=20) withhout manifestation of CRC	Biological: DC vaccination; DC vaccination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Safety and feasibility of vaccination with frameshift-derived neoantigen-loaded DC of CRC patients	Patients will be followed for toxicity, autoimmunity and immunological response during the study and 2 and 6 months thereafter at the outpatient clinic. Subsequently, follow up will be performed as for standard practice. Toxicity will be assessed using the Clinical Toxicity Criteria NCI CTC version 3.0.	5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
To evaluate whether peptide-loaded DC can induce or enhance an immune response to tumor-associated antigen CEA and specific frameshift-derived neoantigens in the study population		5 years
Pathological responses	Pathological evaluation: Biopsies of carcinomas and or adenomas will be taken. One will be snap frozen and stored at -80 and one will be fixed in buffered formalin, for maximum of 24 hours and processed using microwave enhanced procedures. The composition of the tissue will be evaluated using standard histology supplemented with immunohistochemistry for subsets of inflammatory cells. The amount of and composition of the inflammation will be quantified using automated and semi automated quantitative methods. Based on initial results mRNA studies on cytokines and or chemokines will be performed and in addition immunohistochemistry for receptors for these molecules.	5 years
Clinical responses, e.g. disease-free survival, determined according to the standard protocol.	Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration to the first recurrence of disease. Overall survival is defined as the time from registration to death. The status of disease is determined at regular intervals by taking the patients's history, physical examination, and colonoscopy. If signs or symptoms suggest disease recurrence at any site, the appropriate tests should be performed to confirm or exclude this.	5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Radboud University Medical Center
• Investigators: Study Director: Nicoline Hoogerbrugge-van der Linden, professor, Radboud University Medical Center; Principal Investigator: Jolanda IM de Vries, professor, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: October 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Estimated): September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 18, 2013
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 24, 2013
• First Posted (Estimated): June 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 4, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 2, 2025
• Last Verified: April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Immunotherapy; Vaccines; CRC; Dendritic cell vaccination; MSI-high colorectal cancer (CRC); Germline MMR-gene mutation without disease criteria of CRC
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Genetic Diseases, Inborn; Metabolic Diseases; Intestinal Diseases; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Digestive System Neoplasms; Digestive System Diseases; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Intestinal Neoplasms; Rectal Diseases; Colonic Diseases; Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary; DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders; Colorectal Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis
• Other Study ID Numbers: EudraCT 2008-005584-33

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Data will be shared in an upcoming publication.