Comparison Between Continuous Infusion and Intermittent Bolus Injection of Propofol for Deep Sedation During ERCP

July 16, 2013 updated by: Kyo-Sang Yoo, Hanyang University

Comparison Between Continuous Infusion and Intermittent Bolus Injection of Propofol for Deep Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to compare sedation efficiency, safety and satisfaction by both endoscopist, assistants, and the patients between continuous infusion and intermittent bolus injection of propofol for deep sedation during ERCP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The patients undergone ERCP were randomly assigned to either continuous infusion of propofol (continuous group) or midazolam plus intermittent bolus injection of propofol (intermittent group) for deep sedation. In the continuous group, propofol was continuously administered via infusion pump and the doses were determined by sedation assistants monitoring the patients. In the intermittent group, a loading dose of 2 mg of midazolam and 0.4 mg/kg of propofol was initially injected and repeated bolus injection of 20 mg of propofol was followed according to patients' sedation level. Sedation related parameters (total dose of propofol, induction/recovery time, patients' cooperation) and adverse events during the procedure were evaluated. Satisfaction scores by endoscopist, assistant, and patients and difficulty scores of maintaining the sedation by assistants were also graded after the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyeonggi
      • Guri, Gyeonggi, Korea, Republic of, 471-701
        • Hanyang University Guri Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergone ERCP for biliary and pancreatic diseases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comorbid conditions of ASA class 4-5
  • Age under 18 years or over 90 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Past medication history of benzodiazepine or narcotics
  • Known allergy to midazolam or propofol
  • hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg), hypoxemia (SaO2 <90%), or bradycardia (50/min) at baseline measurements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intermittent bolus injection of propofol
A loading dose of 2 mg of midazolam and 0.4 mg/kg of propofol is initially injected and then repeated intermittent bolus injection of 20 mg of propofol is followed according to patients' sedation level.
A loading dose of 2 mg of midazolam and 0.4 mg/kg of propofol is initially injected and then repeated intermittent bolus injection of 20 mg of propofol is followed according to patients' sedation level.
Active Comparator: Continuous infusion of propofol
Propofol is continuously administered intravenously via infusion pump starting with 20 mg/kg/hr and then titrated to about 5 mg/kg/hr according to patients' sedation level.
Propofol is continuously administered intravenously via infusion pump starting with 20 mg/kg/hr and then titrated to about 5 mg/kg/hr according to patients' sedation level.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Satisfaction scores by endoscopist
Time Frame: 30 minutes after the procedure
30 minutes after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse events for sedation
Time Frame: 1 day after the procedure
1 day after the procedure
Difficulty scores of maintaining the sedation
Time Frame: 30 minutes after the procedure
30 minutes after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyo-Sang Yoo, Hanyang University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biliary Tract Diseases

Clinical Trials on Midazolam

Subscribe