Randomized Trial Sorafenib-Pravastatin Versus Sorafenib Alone for the Palliative Treatment of Child-Pugh A Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Principal objective: to evaluate the effect of the combination pravastatin - sorafenib versus sorafenib alone on overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma developing on Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who are unsuitable for curative treatment.

Secondary objectives: evaluate the effect of this treatment on progression-free survival, the time to progression, the time to treatment failure and quality of life (QLQ-C30 et FACT HEP)

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

474

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • CHU de Dijon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed by:
  • either a histological examination
  • or if histological evidence cannot be obtained (ascites, coagulation disorders) the diagnosis can be made in cases of cirrhosis according to EASL/AASLD 2005 criteria, by revealing a hepatic focal lesion of more than 10 mm
  • on two dynamic imaging techniques (helical CT-scan, MRI, contrast-enhanced ultrasound) for tumours measuring less than 2 cm. The lesion must be characterised by hyperdensity during the arterial phase and wash-out during the delayed portal phase Patients who are not suitable for treatment with a curative intent (transplantation, resection, percutaneous destruction) or by chemo-embolisation or with progressive hepatocellular carcinoma after the failure of specific treatment Prognostic CLIP score 0 to 4 Child-Pugh Class A Transaminases ≤ 5 N and Creatininemia ≤ 1.5 N WHO: 0, 1 or 2 Age more than 18 years Foreseeable survival > 12 weeks Possibility of regular follow-up Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extra-hepatic disease that could be life-threatening in the short or medium term Another progressive cancer with the exception of in situ cervical cancer, a superficial bladder tumour and treated basocellular carcinoma.

Any other cancer treated with a curative intent in the previous 3 years can be included in the study Heart failure (≥New York Heart Association class 2), uncontrolled AHT or arrhythmia, myocardial infarction in the previous 6 months Digestive haemorrhage in the previous month Patients who are receiving or have already received treatment with statins or sorafenib Pregnancy and breast-feeding. Women of child-bearing age must use an effective method of contraception throughout the trial and for 3 months after the end of the treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: sorafenib
800 mg of sorafenib twice daily orally.
Other Names:
  • 800 mg of sorafenib twice daily orally.
Experimental: sorafenib-pravastatin
800 mg of sorafenib twice daily oral doses associated with 40 mg of pravastatin in a taken per os. Pravastatin will be taken during dinner.
Other Names:
  • 800 mg of sorafenib twice daily oral doses associated with
  • 40 mg of pravastatin in a taken per os. Pravastatin will be taken during dinner.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
determination of the tumor according to the evaluation criteria of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time Frame: To be done within the month preceding baseline
To be done within the month preceding baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child-Pugh A Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Sorafenib

3
Subscribe