- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01911910
Heart Attack Prevention Programme for You (HAPPY) London (HAPPYLondon)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Heart Attack Prevention Programme for You London (HAPPY London) will be conducted as a randomised controlled trial comparing the use of tailored e-coaching in addition to the standard of care vs. standard care alone. Standard care is defined as the care that would be offered by the NHS Health Check programme through the NHS primary care. We will use a range of established and novel cardiovascular markers to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of e-coaching and gain pathophysiological insight into how lifestyle modifications affect the cardiovascular system. These measures include cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), aortic stiffness parameters, vascular ultrasound and other biomarkers of CV disease risk.
Intervention
The HAPPY London web-based tool will provide the participant with an individualised score for their lifestyle and 10 year CV risk score, based on the modified Framingham score and the UK specific QRisk Score, and provide tailored advice and education on the suboptimal factors. Ideal targets will be set and the information will be updated at 3 and 6 months allowing the participant to view their progress. Weekly emails with brief health and lifestyle advice will be sent to encourage healthier behaviour based on clinical studies or topical issues in the media. Links to social networks, such as Facebook posting and the ability to allow chosen 'buddies' from family or friends to view their progress will aim to further encourage healthier behaviour.
The study involves the recruitment of 400 adults between the age of 40 and 74 years who have a moderate to high 10-year CV risk score (Estimated 10 year CV risk >10%). Half of the study group will receive use of the e-coaching in addition to standard care allocated randomly stratified according to either moderate (QRisk between 10 and 20%) or high risk (QRisk more than or equal to 20%). The initial screening will take place on the www.happylondon.info web-based 'mini-check' questionnaire. Potential participants will then be seen at a physical screening visit to confirm eligibility. 3 subsequent visits will take place over 6 months; baseline, 3 month and 6 month follow up. A subgroup of the study population (65 from each intervention arm thus totalling 130 participants ) will also have a baseline and follow up cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Assessment will be performed using a variety of measures through questionnaires, blood pressure (BP) checks, blood tests, ultrasound scans, oscillometric method to assess pulse wave velocity and pulse wave analysis and CMR multi-parametric scanning.
The primary aim of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of individualised, continuous electronic (e-) coaching to support a healthier lifestyle as a primary prevention tool to reduce the CV risk and improve the quality of life in asymptomatic individuals with intermediate to high 10 year CV risk.
Other questions that we aim to answer are:
- Is computer-tailored e-coaching cost-effective in the short-term (clinical trial period) and during the long-term (decision analysis modelling)
- What are the associations of personality traits, economic preferences, and sociocultural factors with the achieved lifestyle modifications and changes in the cardiovascular phenotype?
- What is the relationship between changes observed in markers derived from our multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging protocols following lifestyle changes?
- How frequent are silent myocardial infarctions in a typical NHS Health Check population?
- Do treatment effects differ between ethnic groups?
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, E2 9JX
- Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen May University of London
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects will be enrolled following an informed consent. The subject will be able to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions and protocol-stated restrictions
- Subjects will be between 40 and 74 years of age
- Subjects will have unrestricted access to the Internet
- Subjects will be sufficiently fluent in English language.
- Subjects will have an estimated intermediate to high risk for CV events based on the web-based pre-screening tool (www.happylondon.info), which is based on the nonlaboratory Framingham risk score (>10% 10 year cardiovascular risk)
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA)
- Cardiac sounding chest pain requiring further investigations
- Current life threatening conditions other than vascular disease (e.g. very severe chronic airways disease, HIV positive, life-threatening arrhythmias) that may prevent a subject from completing the study
- Only for subgroup undergoing cardiac contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance studies: Any contraindication to a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance study, such as known allergies to gadolinium-based contrast agents, severe claustrophobia, pacemakers, defibrillators, etc
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Standard care
Usual care that would be provided by the NHS Health Check or equivalent.
|
|
|
Experimental: Electronic coaching plus standard care
Tailored coaching for participants randomised to use the HAPPY e-coaching tool.
Access to lifestyle and heart health scores and personalised advice to improve suboptimal behaviour.
|
The HAPPY London web-based tool will provide the participant with an individualised score for their lifestyle and 10 year CV risk score, based mainly on the modified Framingham score, and provide tailored advice and education on the suboptimal factors.
Ideal targets will be set and the information will be updated at 3 and 6 months allowing the participant to view their progress.
Weekly emails with brief health and lifestyle advice will be sent to encourage healthier behaviour based on clinical studies or topical issues in the media.
Links to social networks, such as Facebook posting and the ability to allow chosen family and friends to view their progress will aim to further encourage healthier behaviour.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Change in aortic stiffness using a Vicorder device measured in m/s
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness CIMT
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
carotid intima media thickness CIMT as measured by ultrasound
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Data not reported as full analysis not done due to time constraints
|
Lifestyle, quality of life and physical activity questionnaires.
Questionnaires SF-36, EQ5D-3L, RPAQ.
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Data not reported as full analysis not done due to time constraints
|
|
Pulse Wave Velocity by CMR
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month. Data not reported as full analysis not possible due to time and resource limitations.
|
Change in aortic stiffness as measured by CMR derived aortic pulse wave velocity measured in m/s
|
Baseline and 6 month. Data not reported as full analysis not possible due to time and resource limitations.
|
|
Aortic Distensibility by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month
|
CMR will be performed on 65 participants in the treatment and 65 in the standard care group. Change in aortic stiffness - aortic distensibility (mmHg-1, CMR)). |
Baseline and 6 month
|
|
Left Ventricular Mass by CMR
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month
|
Change in LV mass index (g/m2, CMR).
|
Baseline and 6 month
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by CMR
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month
|
LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indices, (ml/m2, CMR), LV EF (%, CMR).
|
Baseline and 6 month
|
|
Myocardial Fibrosis by CMR
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month. Baseline and 6 month. Data not reported as full analysis not possible due to time and resource limitations.
|
Extent and change in diffuse myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume fraction measured as a %, derived from CMR imaging)
|
Baseline and 6 month. Baseline and 6 month. Data not reported as full analysis not possible due to time and resource limitations.
|
|
Diastolic Function by CMR
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month. Baseline and 6 month. Data not reported as full analysis not possible due to time and resource limitations.
|
Diastolic function (strain and strain rate in % and s-1, respectively derived from CMR imaging data). This is a measure of how stiff the main chamber of the heart is. The software to analyse these data will be available in the future. The raw images from the scan will be used for future analysis once software for this assessment is developed. Our group is working on developing this tool. |
Baseline and 6 month. Baseline and 6 month. Data not reported as full analysis not possible due to time and resource limitations.
|
|
Change in Framingham Risk Score
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Assessment of cardiovascular risk based on the Framingham algorithm. Minimum value 0% and maximum value theoretically 100%. Higher score means worse predicted outcome. Assessment of 10-year cardiovascular risk score based on the Framingham population derived algorithm. Minimum value 0% and maximum value theoretically 100%. Higher score means worse predicted outcome. |
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in QRisk Score
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Assessment of cardiovascular risk score based on the QRisk risk score. Minimum value 0% and maximum value theoretically 100%. Higher score means worse predicted outcome. Assessment of cardiovascular risk score based on the UK standardised using the QRISK2 algorithm (www.qrisk.org). Minimum value 0% and maximum value theoretically 100%. Higher score means worse predicted outcome. |
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in Total Cholesterol to HDL Ratio
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Ratio of Total cholesterol to HDL from blood test for lipid profile.
Change in the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio as assessed though cholesterol blood test.
Negative value suggests an improvement.
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in LDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Bloods for lipid profile.
Change in the level of LDL cholesterol as assessed though cholesterol blood test.
Negative value for change suggests an improvement.
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in Glucose Levels
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Fasting glucose bloods. This is an assessment for presence of diabetes and control of blood sugar levels on the day of the test. Change in the blood glucose level as measure on the day of the visit as a measure of blood sugar level. Negative value would suggest an improvement. |
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in hsCRP
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
baseline and change in hsCRP blood test.
hsCRP is measured through a blood test and is a marker of inflammation.
Change in the hsCRP level though a blood test.
Negative value suggests an improvement.
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in Physical Activity
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Lifestyle, quality of life and physical activity questionnaires.
Questionnaires SF-36, EQ5D-3L, RPAQ
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Change in systolic blood pressure measured during sitting position
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Change in diastolic blood pressure measure during sitting position.
|
Assessed at Baseline visit, 3 months and 6 months; Month 6 reported
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steffen E Petersen, MD DPhil, Queen Mary University of London
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Khanji MY, Balawon A, Boubertakh R, Hofstra L, Narula J, Hunink M, Pugliese F, Petersen SE. Personalized E-Coaching in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Glob Health. 2019 Jul 12;85(1):107. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2496.
- Khanji MY, Stone IS, Boubertakh R, Cooper JA, Barnes NC, Petersen SE. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Risk: A Case-Control Study. COPD. 2020 Feb;17(1):81-89. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1694501. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ReDa: 007711
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease
-
University of FloridaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; Brown UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Psychosocial Influence on Cardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruitingCardiovascular Disease (CVD) | Gender Incongruence | Cardiovascular (CV) Risk | Cardiovascular Health Status | Cardiovascular Disease Prevention | Cardiovascular Disease Acute | Cardiovascular Disease Risk FactorItaly
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedCardiovascular Disease | Inflammatory DiseaseUnited States
-
University College DublinBeacon Hospital, IrelandRecruitingCoronary Artery Disease (CAD) | Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) | Cardiovascular Disease Prevention | Cardiovascular Disease Risk FactorIreland
-
Fu Jen Catholic UniversityRecruitingCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular SurgeryTaiwan
-
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAA.R.C.A Associazioni Regionali Cardiologi AmbulatorialiRecruiting
-
AmgenRecruitingCardiovascular DiseaseItaly, Germany, United States, China, Japan, Spain, Denmark, Australia, France, Canada, Netherlands
-
University of ReadingBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Royal Berkshire NHS...Not yet recruiting
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la RéunionRecruitingCardiovascular DiseaseFrance
Clinical Trials on Electronic coaching plus standard care
-
Queen Mary University of LondonCompleted
-
Hoag Memorial Hospital PresbyterianInstitute for Systems Biology; ArivaleCompletedCognitive Impairment | Alzheimer DiseaseUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA...Active, not recruitingStress Disorders, Post-traumaticUnited States
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Johns Hopkins University; Columbia... and other collaboratorsCompletedFractures, Bone | Serious Fall-related InjuriesUnited States
-
Gachon University Gil Medical CenterRecruitingHeart Failure | Frailty | Randomized Controlled Trial | Telenursing | Patient Monitoring | Health CoachingKorea, Republic of
-
Avita MedicalNAMSACompletedVenous Leg UlcersUnited Kingdom, France
-
Duke UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedPhysical Activity | Cardiac Rehabilitation | Health CoachingUnited States
-
Cishan Hospital, Ministry of Health and WelfareCompletedFrailty | Sarcopenia | Long Term Care FacilityTaiwan
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaCompletedLow Back Pain | Pelvic Pain | Adhesions | Scar TissueUnited States