Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Imaging Versus Tomosynthesis in Detection of Hip, Wrist or Tibia Injury (TOMO)

May 22, 2020 updated by: Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.

Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Imagining Versus FujiFilm's Digital Radiographic AcSellerate CsI System With Tomosynthesis

To acquire and build a library of image sets to determine if Fuji's TOMO imaging device can replace or compliment current imaging standards to assess patients with hip, wrist or tibia injuries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects presenting with a wrist injury, tibial fracture, or hip injury that require protocol defined standard imaging will have an X-Ray, CT Scan (or MRI per site preference) and TOMO completed. Images will be assessed to determine if TOMO is appropriate to supplement or replace the need for the other standard images.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
        • Loyola University of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physician request to have diagnostic imaging for condition areas

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18
  • Pregnancy
  • Insufficient Anatomical Coverage or Potential Image Problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard X-Ray + CT
Standard X-Ray + CT arm to be used as comparative arm for investigational imaging device. Investigators will determine standard of care to be used on a per subject basis.
Standard of Care X-Ray Imaging + CT
Fujifilm Digital Radiographic AcSelerate CsI System with Tomosynthesis
Active Comparator: Standard X-Ray + MRI
Standard X-Ray + MRI arm to be used as comparative arm for investigational imaging device. Investigators will determine standard of care to be used on a per subject basis.
Fujifilm Digital Radiographic AcSelerate CsI System with Tomosynthesis
Standard of Care X-Ray Imaging + MRI
Experimental: Tomo
Fujifilm Digital Radiographic AcSelerate CsI System with Tomosynthesis
Standard of Care X-Ray Imaging + CT
Fujifilm Digital Radiographic AcSelerate CsI System with Tomosynthesis
Standard of Care X-Ray Imaging + MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants for Whom Tibia Injury Was Detected
Time Frame: Baseline Imaging Collection
Clinical utility where the DTS could replace and/or complement existing imaging procedures; for example, Computed Tomography for fractures of the tibial plateau or scaphoid - where radiation dose, access to modality and cost play a factor in planning initial diagnosis and/or follow-up imaging strategies. Subsequent independent review by the principal investigator (PI) [or designee] to show the ability of the Fujifilm DTS system to provide images of clinical equivalence compared to those acquired on other FDA cleared imaging systems.
Baseline Imaging Collection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Davide Bova, MD, Loyola University Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMSU2012-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tibial Fracture

Clinical Trials on Standard X-Ray + CT

3
Subscribe