Physiologic Effects of Noninvasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) Versus Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation in Patients at Risk for Respiratory Distress Needed Preventive Used of Noninvasive Ventilation After Extubation. (NAVA-VNI)

May 21, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux
The purpose of this study is to compare inspiratory effort, comfort, gas exchange and patient ventilator synchrony during non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist or pneumatically triggered and cycled-off noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV), in patient at risk of respiratory distress after extubation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Reintubation, which occurs after planned extubation, is a relevant consequence of respiratory failure after extubation. The early use of noninvasive pressure support ventilation averted respiratory failure after extubation in patients at increased risk. However patient tolerance to the technique is a critical factor determining its success. One of the key factors determining tolerance to Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is optimal synchrony between the patient's spontaneous breathing activity and the ventilator's settings, known as patient ventilator interaction. Optimal patient-ventilator synchrony during NIV can prove very difficult to achieve due to the presence of leaks, the type of interface which can interfere with various aspects of ventilator function. Patient ventilator synchrony during NPSV can be compromised when using conventional pneumatic triggering, with the ventilator-delivered inspiratory support starting after the patient's inspiratory effort. The switch from inspiration to expiration (cycling-off) should, ideally, coincide with the end of the patient's inspiratory effort. However greater asynchrony at the end of inspiration, with the ventilator cycling off either too early or too late compared to the end of the patient's inspiratory effort can be observed during NPSV. A possible solution is to replace the pneumatic triggering with neural triggering and cycling off using the diaphragm electrical activity (Eadi). Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm to control the timing and pressure of the ventilation delivered. The ventilator is triggered, limited and cycled-off directly by Eadi. The Eadi is measured by a multiple array oesophageal electrode. The array of bipolar electrodes can be mounted on a feeding tube, which is routinely introduced in critically ill patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • CHU de Bordeaux

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

inclusion criteria:

  • Patients intubated for 48 h or more
  • Patients who tolerated a 120-min spontaneous breathing trial after recovery from their acute disease with no signs of respiratory failure
  • Patients at high risk for respiratory after extubation were enrolled if they had at least two of the following risk factors for respiratory failure after extubation:

    • age older than 65 years
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
    • heart failure as the cause for intubation
    • An Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II score greater than 12 on the day of extubation.

exclusion criteria:

  • Age younger than 18 years
  • Head trauma or surgery
  • Recent gastric or oesophageal surgery
  • Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Excessive amount of respiratory secretions
  • Poor cooperation
  • Decision to limit life-supporting treatments in the ICU
  • Tracheostomy or other upper airway disorders
  • Lack of collaboration
  • Do not resuscitate order or any decision to limit therapeutic effort in the ICU.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1

Patients will have two 20-minute noninvasive periods :

Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) and then Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV)

Experimental: Arm 2

Patients will have two 20-minute noninvasive periods :

Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV) and then Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inspiratory muscle effort
Time Frame: At inclusion (day 0)
The primary endpoint variable is the inspiratory muscle effort. To estimate the inspiratory effort, we will determine the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), the transdiaphragmatic pressure time product per breath (PTPdi/b) or per minute (PTPdi/min) and the Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (EADI)max.
At inclusion (day 0)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient ventilator synchrony
Time Frame: At inclusion (Day 0)
Patient ventilator synchrony will be identified by estimating the following variables: autocycled breaths, ineffective inspiratory effort, the inspiratory trigger delay, the expiratory trigger delay and the time of synchrony between muscle effort and ventilator support.
At inclusion (Day 0)
gas exchange
Time Frame: At inclusion (Day 0)
At inclusion (Day 0)
Patient comfort
Time Frame: At inclusion (Day 0)
Patient comfort will be assessed using a five-item semi quantitative scale: 1, uncomfortable; 2, somewhat uncomfortable; 3, acceptable; 4, somewhat comfortable; and 5, comfortable.
At inclusion (Day 0)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frédéric VARGAS, MD-PhD, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

August 23, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHUBX 2011/27
  • 2012-A00197-36 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress

Clinical Trials on Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA).

Subscribe