Efficacy and Safety of a Double Icodextrin Dose in Elderly Incident CAPD Patients on Incremental PD. (DIDo)

November 8, 2020 updated by: Pr Eric Goffin

Efficacy and Safety of a Double Icodextrin Dose in Elderly Incident CAPD Patients on Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis Therapy: the DIDo Study

The DIDo study is an open-label, randomised, multicentre study with 2 parallel groups in incident CAPD patients aged of 65 at minimum :

  • One group in which patients will receive 2 bags of icodextrin/day and 1 bag of glucose
  • One group in which patients will receive 1 bag of icodextrin/day and 2 bags of glucose.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The DiDo study evaluates efficacy and safety of a Double Icodextrin Dose in elderly incident CAPD patients on incremental Peritoneal Dialysis therapy.

The objective is to demonstrate the superiority and safety of using 2, as compared to 1, icodextrin bags / day, in a cohort of elderly incident continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients using incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) (3 bags / day), with the aim of prolonging the period of time for which incremental PD can be used.

This is a phase IV open-label, randomised, multicentre study with 2 parallel groups, which will take place in up to 30 hospital out-patient clinics un Europe.

It is planned to include 160 patients on the run-in period in order to obtain 100 randomised patients and 90 patients evaluable at the primary endpoint (45 in each group). The duration of patient recruitment is estimated at 1 year but this may be extended until all 160 patients are recruited.

There are 2 periods: a run-in period of 2 months and a treatment period of 18 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Run-in period

  • Incident CAPD patients who require incremental PD and in whom a 1.5L dialysate can be safely instilled,
  • Creatinine clearance < 20 ml / min (calculated with the modification of the Diet in renal Disease [MDRD] formula),
  • Age ≥ 60 years,
  • Patients willing and able to give written informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol.

Treatment period

  • Patients having successfully completed the run-in period (achieving euvolemia)

Exclusion Criteria:

Run-in period

  • Contraindication for CAPD according to local practice,
  • Life expectancy < 6 months,
  • Known allergy to icodextrin (cloudy dialysate or skin rash),
  • Need for amino-acid prescription,
  • Treatment with any investigational product within 30 days prior to signature of the informed consent form (ICF)
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse within 3 months prior to the signature of the ICF.

Treatment period

  • Severe symptomatic arterial hypotension at the end the run-in period in the Investigator's opinion,
  • Excessive ultrafiltration (UF) during the run-in period,
  • Allergy to icodextrin discovered during the run-in period,
  • Impossibility to achieve adequate PD regimen within the run-in period (catheter dysfunction, peritoneal leaks, inadequate compliance, psychosocial reasons)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2 icodextrin bags/day
2 icodextrin bags + 1 glucose per day
Other Names:
  • Extraneal
Active Comparator: 1 icodextrin bag/day
1 icodextrin bag + 2 glucose bags per day
Other Names:
  • Extraneal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients stopping 3 bags / day
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of 18 months

The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients stopping 3 bags / day for the following reasons:

  • Use of > 15 % hypertonic glucose dialysate 3.86 % or > 30 % hypertonic glucose dialysate 2.27 % over a 4-week period19-20,
  • Transfer of the patient to another dialysis method (HD, APD, CAPD with > 3 bags / day) for any reason,
  • Death of the patient.
During the treatment phase of 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
• Metabolic control: HbA1c and lipid concentration (total, high-density lipoprotein [HDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], triglycerides, cholesterol)
During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
• Blood pressure control, evaluated by the number of anti-hypertensive agents and daily furosemide dose, and measured at the end of each study visit
During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
• Nutritional aspect: serum albumin and prealbumin concentrations based on the changes in percentage at various time points compared to baseline (V2)
During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
• Inflammatory profile: CRP concentrations
During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: Month 9 and month 18.
• Left ventricular mass calculated following echocardiography
Month 9 and month 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: Month 6, 12 and 18.
• Quality of life according to KDQoL
Month 6, 12 and 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
• Residual renal function evaluated by calculated GFR
During 18 months, evaluated on month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: On month 6, 12 and 18.
• Peritoneal membrane permeability assessed by the PET
On month 6, 12 and 18.
effect on clinical and biological determinants
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of 18 months.
• Number of hospitalisations and length (in days) of hospitalisation
During the treatment phase of 18 months.
Safety endpoints
Time Frame: Durign the treatment phase of 18 months.
• Adverse events (AEs), treatment-emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs)
Durign the treatment phase of 18 months.
6.1.3 Safety endpoints
Time Frame: On month 3, 6, 12 and 18.
• Serum sodium concentration and icodextrin metabolites concentration
On month 3, 6, 12 and 18.
safety endpoints
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of 18 months.
• Relevant clinical problems related to serum sodium concentration and to icodextrin metabolites accumulation
During the treatment phase of 18 months.
Safety endpoints
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of 18 months.
• Incidence of skin rashes
During the treatment phase of 18 months.
Safety endpoints
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of 18 months.
• Incidence of sterile peritonitis
During the treatment phase of 18 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Goffin, UCL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Icodextrin

Subscribe