Study to Evaluate the Effects Icodextrin Versus Dianeal on Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients (STARCH)

September 30, 2014 updated by: Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Icodextrin vs 2.5% Dianeal Used for the Long Dwell in Apd: a Randomized, Open-label Clinical Trial to Analyse the Insulin Resistance Using the Homa Index in Prevalent, Non-diabetic Patients

  1. LOCATION OF STUDY: Multicentric study in Brazil.
  2. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To measure changes in HOMA index when non-diabetic patients in APD were exposed to 7,5% Icodextrin for the long-dwell; and to compare such changes with those produced by 2,5% glucose for the long-dwell.
  3. PRIMARY OUTCOME: The primary efficacy outcome was to measure HOMA index to set the differences with regard to baseline values of this variable for the two groups as well as in each group, which showed control of the glucose metabolism.

STAGE OF THE STUDY : Phase IV postmarket study

DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either to Extraneal (7,5% Icodextrin) or 2.5% Dianeal during the long-dwell.

SAMPLE SIZE: Randomization Upon completion of the study TOTAL: 120 60 ExtranealTM 60 30 Dianeal® 60 30

Duration: 1 year.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

1. SUMMARY OF THE STUDY

1.1 PROTOCOLE TITLE : A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL CLINICAL TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF ICODEXTRIN Vs 2,5% DIANEAL USED FOR THE LONG-DWELL ON HOMA INDEX IN PREVALENT, NON-DIABETIC, PATIENTS IN AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (APD)

1.2 MAIN RESEARCHERS: Roberto Pecoits Filho, Thyago P. Moraes

1.3 LOCATION OF STUDY: Multicentric study in Brazil.

1.4 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To measure changes in HOMA index when non-diabetic patients in APD were exposed to 7,5% Icodextrin for the long-dwell; and to compare such changes with those produced by 2,5% glucose for the long-dwell.

1.5 PRIMARY OUTCOME: The primary efficacy outcome was to measure HOMA index to set the differences with regard to baseline values of this variable for the two groups as well as in each group, which showed control of the glucose metabolism.

1.6 SECONDARY OUTCOMES:

1.6.1 Other efficacy outcomes were total UF, long-dwell UF, and preprandial glycemia (taken first in the morning before breakfast), serum insulin levels and glycated haemoglobin.

1.6.2 The incidence of adverse events will be measured as a safety outcome.

1.7 STAGE OF THE STUDY : Phase IV postmarket study

1.8 DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either to Extraneal (7,5% Icodextrin) or 2.5% Dianeal during the long-dwell.

1.9 SAMPLE SIZE: Randomization Upon completion of the study TOTAL: 100 60 ExtranealTM 50 30 Dianeal® 50 30

1.12 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, ROUTE OF DE ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE

ExtranealTM (7.5% Icodextrin) solution for Peritoneal Dialysis:

It is labelled as "solution for dialysis" to be administered within the study for a period of one (1) year.

Available in 2 liter bags of peritoneal dialysis solution (Twin Bag) for CAPD, this product will be used during the long-dwell.

Dianeal® PD4 (2.5% Dextrose) solution for Peritoneal Dialysis:

It is labelled as 2.27% glucose-based "solution for dialysis", to be administered within the study for a period of one (1) year.

Available in 2 and 2.5 liter bags of peritoneal dialysis solution (Twin Bag) for CAPD, this product will be used during the long-dwell.

Duration: 1 year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04023 062
        • Universidade Federal de São Paulo
    • MG
      • Divinópolis, MG, Brazil
        • Hospital São João de Deus
    • Minas Gerais
      • Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 38400 089
        • Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
    • PR
      • Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 80220901
        • Clinica de Doencas Renais
    • Parana
      • Curitiba, Parana, Brazil, 80250-070
        • Instituto do Rim de Curitiba
    • Rio Grande do Sul
      • Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 95010-003
        • Nefroclinica de Caxias do Sul
    • Sao Paulo
      • Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 18618970
        • Universidade Estadual Paulista
    • Sergipe
      • Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil, 49075210
        • Clinese

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1.10.1 Older than 18 years old.
  • High PET value, average-high or average-low.
  • Cause of renal chronic disease other than diabetes mellitus.
  • Patient in APD
  • Prevalent patient in APD (defined as at least 90 total days of dialysis therapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not willing to participate.
  • A Charlson comorbidity index >7, or a life expectancy < 12 months as assessed by the treating physician.
  • Positive VIH.
  • Episodes of peritonitis during the month preceding the randomization.
  • Significant cardiovascular, metabolic or infectious complications during the month preceding the randomization.
  • Patients with active cancer.
  • Patients with known allergies to corn starch polymers.
  • Patients who are unable to provide an informed consent because of significant psychiatric disorder or mental illness
  • Patients not meeting adequacy goals several months after the change in the dosage regime.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: icodextrin
glucose sparing alternative dialysis solution
glucose sparing dialysis solution
Other Names:
  • Extraneal
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: dextrose
dianeal, Control group, standard treatment
glucose based dialysis solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adjusted HOMA Index Score at 3 Months Using Baseline Values as a Covariate and Groups as the Fixed Factor
Time Frame: 3 months

Adjusted HOMA index score at 3 months using baseline values as a covariate and groups as the fixed factor. HOMA index was calculated as follows:

(fasting glucose(mg/dl) x fasting serum insulin (μU/mL))/405

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral Fasting Serum Glucose
Time Frame: 3 months

Serum glucose measured in oral fasting but not peritoneal fasting.

For this outcome we compared groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using the baseline values as covariate, groups as the fixed factor and the value obtained at 90 days as the dependent variable. Significance level for alpha was setting at < 0.05.

3 months
Serum Insulin
Time Frame: 3 months
Serum insulin was log-transformed to meet all criteria for ANCOVA. The baseline value was treated as covariate, groups as the fixed factor and the serum insulin at 3 months as the dependent variable. Serum insulin was measured in oral fasting by chemioluminescense.
3 months
Glycated Hemoglobin
Time Frame: 3 months

Adjusted glycated hemoglobin was obtained and compared between groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The baseline values of HbA1c was used as covariate, the groups as the fixed factor and the value obtained at 90 days as the dependent variable.

Glycated hemoglobin was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

3 months
Total Ultrafiltration
Time Frame: 3 months
Total ultrafiltration obtained in 24 hours was obtained and compared between groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The baseline values of total ultrafiltration was used as covariate, the groups as the fixed factor and the value obtained at 90 days as the dependent variable.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roberto Pecoits-Filho, MD, PhD, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disorders Associated With Peritoneal Dialysis

Clinical Trials on icodextrin

3
Subscribe