- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01945034
5% Topical Ibuprofen (IBU) for Ankle Sprain
April 19, 2016 updated by: Pfizer
Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Evaluation Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Ibuprofen 5% Topical Gel For The Treatment Of Ankle Sprain
This study is being conducted to evaluate the effects of IBU 5% Topical Gel versus topical placebo for the relief of pain associated with a first or second degree ankle sprain.
Both twice daily and three times daily regimens will be evaluated.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
304
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Sheffield, Alabama, United States, 35660
- Helen Keller Hospital
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
- Visions Clinical Research - Tucson
-
-
California
-
Anaheim, California, United States, 92801
- Orange County Research Institute
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92120
- eStudy Site
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92120
- San Diego Sports Medicine and Family Health Center
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33130
- Sunrise Research Institute, Inc.
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33144
- L&L Research Choices
-
S. Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
- Doctors Research Network
-
-
Idaho
-
Blackfoot, Idaho, United States, 83221
- Elite Clinical Trials LLLP
-
-
Louisiana
-
Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
- MedPharmics, LLC
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
- Quality Clinical Research, Inc.
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68134
- Heartland Clinical Research, Inc.
-
-
North Carolina
-
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States, 28144
- PMG Research of Salisbury
-
-
North Dakota
-
Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58103
- Lillestol Research, LLC
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77074
- Clinical Trial Network
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- Clinical Trials of Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc.
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78240
- Sports Medicine Associates of San Antonio
-
-
Virginia
-
Danville, Virginia, United States, 24541
- Danville Orthopedic Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- First or second degree ankle sprain within 48 hours of first dose of study medication
- Medically cleared to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Similar injury of same joint within last 6 months
- Requires bed rest, surgery, or over-the-counter or prescription analgesics
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo twice daily
|
Topical gel administered as a 4 inch strip twice daily for 7 days, and as needed for an additional 3 days
|
|
Experimental: Topical IBU twice daily
|
Topical gel administered as 4 inch strip twice daily for 7 days, and as needed for an additional 3 days
|
|
Experimental: Topical IBU three times daily
|
Topical gel administered as a 4 inch strip three times daily for 7 days, and as needed for additional 3 days
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo three times daily
|
Topical gel administered as a 4 inch strip three times daily for 7 days, and as needed for additional 3 days
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) on Weight Bearing Over 3 Days (SPID WB0-3)
Time Frame: Over 3 Days (0-72 hours)
|
PI was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
Pain intensity difference (PID) was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID was calculated as the time-weighted sum of PID scores over 3 days (72 hours).
Total score ranges from -360 (higher pain relief) to 432 (lower pain relief) for SPID WB0-3.
SPID is a value of change from baseline and as pain score at base line is usually higher than that at post baseline, a negative value of SPID indicates higher pain relief from baseline.
|
Over 3 Days (0-72 hours)
|
|
Sum of Ankle Pain Intensity Difference on Weight Bearing Over 24 Hours After Dose 1 (SPID WB24)
Time Frame: 0 to 24 hours
|
PI was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID was calculated as the time-weighted sum of PID scores over 24 hours.
Total score ranges from -120 (higher pain relief) to 144 (lower pain relief) for SPID WB24.
SPID is a value of change from baseline.
Pain score at base line is usually higher than that at post baseline.
So negative value of SPID indicates pain relief from baseline, while a positive value means a worst pain comparing to baseline, a negative value of SPID indicates higher pain relief from baseline.
|
0 to 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at Rest Over 24 Hours on Day 1 (SPID R24)
Time Frame: 0 to 24 hours
|
PI was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID was calculated as the time-weighted sum of PID scores over 24 hours.
Total score ranges from -240 (higher pain relief) to 96 (lower pain relief) for SPID at rest.
SPID is a value of change from baseline.
Pain score at base line is usually higher than that at post baseline.
So negative value of SPID indicates pain relief from baseline, while positive value means a worst pain comparing to baseline, a negative value of SPID indicates higher pain relief from baseline.
|
0 to 24 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Ankle Injury at Day 3 and 10
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, 10
|
Participant's global assessments of ankle injury was measured using 5-point scale: 1= Very Good (No symptoms and no limitations of normal activities), 2= Good (Mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= Fair (Moderate symptoms and limitations of some normal activities), 4= Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), 5= Very Poor (Very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
|
Baseline, Day 3, 10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Ankle Injury at Day 3 and 10
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, 10
|
The physician assessment of the severity of the ankle injury was based on the participant's individual signs and symptoms which included pain, swelling, tenderness and limitation of range of movement, and was measured using 6-point scale: 0= Normal (No signs or symptoms) , 1= Very mild (Very mild signs and symptoms), 2= Mild (Mild signs and symptoms), 3= Moderate (Moderate signs and symptoms), 4= Severe (Severe signs and symptoms), 5= Very severe (Very severe signs and symptoms).
A higher score is indicative of lesser improvement.
Change from baseline was calculated as baseline value minus post-treatment value.
|
Baseline, Day 3, 10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankle Pain at Rest and Upon Weight Bearing (PID NRS) at Pre-specified Time Points
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12(Day1),24(Day2),30(Day2),36(Day2),48(Day3),50(Day3),54(Day3),60(Day3),72(Day4),78(Day4),84(Day4), 96(Day5),102(Day5), 108 (Day5), 120(Day6),126(Day6),132(Day6),144(Day7),150(Day7),156(Day7) hours post first dose on Day 1
|
PI in ankle pain at rest and upon weight bearing was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
Pain score at baseline is usually higher than that at post baseline.
So negative value of SPID indicates pain relief from baseline, while positive value means a worst pain comparing to baseline.
|
Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12(Day1),24(Day2),30(Day2),36(Day2),48(Day3),50(Day3),54(Day3),60(Day3),72(Day4),78(Day4),84(Day4), 96(Day5),102(Day5), 108 (Day5), 120(Day6),126(Day6),132(Day6),144(Day7),150(Day7),156(Day7) hours post first dose on Day 1
|
|
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at Rest and on Weight Bearing Over 6 Hours on Day 1 and Over 2 Hours on Day 3
Time Frame: Over 6 hours on Day 1, over 2 hours on Day 3
|
PI at rest and on weight bearing was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID 0-6 was calculated as the time-weighted sum of PID scores over 6 hours on Day 1, with a total score ranges from -30 (higher pain relief) to 36 (lower pain relief).
SPID 0-12 was calculated as the time weighted sum of PID scores over 2 hours on Day 3, with a total score ranges from -10 (higher pain relief) to 12 (lower pain relief).
SPID is a value of change from baseline.
Pain score at base line is usually higher than that at post baseline.
So negative value of SPID indicates pain relief from baseline, while positive value means a worst pain comparing to baseline, a negative value of SPID indicates higher pain relief from baseline.
|
Over 6 hours on Day 1, over 2 hours on Day 3
|
|
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Scores at Rest Over 3 Days
Time Frame: Over 3 Days (0-72 hours)
|
PI was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID was calculated as the time-weighted sum of PID scores over 3 days (72 hours).
Total score ranges from -360 (higher pain relief) to 432 (lower pain relief).
SPID is a value of change from baseline.
Pain score at base line is usually higher than that at post baseline.
So negative value of SPID indicates pain relief from baseline, while positive value means a worst pain comparing to baseline, a negative value of SPID indicates higher pain relief from baseline.
|
Over 3 Days (0-72 hours)
|
|
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Scores at Rest and on Weight Bearing Over 7 Days
Time Frame: Over 7 days (0-168 hours)
|
PI was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID was calculated as the time-weighted sum of PID scores over 7 days (168 hours).
Total score ranges from -840 (higher pain relief) to 1008 (lower pain relief).
SPID is a value of change from baseline.
Pain score at baseline is usually higher than that at post baseline.
So negative value of SPID indicates pain relief from baseline, while positive value means a worst pain comparing to baseline, a negative value of SPID indicates higher pain relief from baseline.
|
Over 7 days (0-168 hours)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Normal Function and Activity at Day 3 and 10
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, 10
|
Participant assessment of normal function was measured using a 5-point scale: 1= Normal walking/activity and no pain; 2= Normal walking/activity with pain; 3= Mildly restricted walking due to pain and can't resume normal activities; 4= Moderately restricted walking due to pain and can't resume normal activities; 5= Severely restricted walking due to pain and can't resume normal activities.
The normal functioning and activity scores for each question range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worsening of normal activity.
|
Baseline, Day 3, 10
|
|
Participant's Global Assessment of Medication at End of Study
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Participants Global Assessment of Medication was used to rate the medication as a pain reliever.
The responses of participants were recorded using 5-point scale: 1= Very Poor, 2= Poor, 3= Fair, 4= Good, 5= Very Good.
The global assessment of medication scores for each question range from 0 to 5, giving a possible score range of 0 - 5, with higher scores indicating medication as a better pain reliever.
|
Day 10
|
|
Time to First Perceptible Relief and Meaningful Relief
Time Frame: 0 to 3 hours on Day 1
|
Participants evaluated time to first perceptible relief by stopping a stopwatch labelled 'first perceptible relief' at moment participant first began to experience any relief, exact question asked was: "Stop stopwatch when you first begin to feel any pain-relieving effect whatsoever of product; that is, when you first feel a little relief".
First perceptible relief was considered confirmed by meaningful relief if participant achieved both "first perceptible" and "meaningful" relief by either pressing second stopwatch or by indicating that his/her "first perceptible" relief was also "meaningful".
For "time to meaningful relief," exact question asked was: "Stop this stopwatch when you have meaningful relief; that is, when relief from pain is meaningful to you."
Stopwatches were active up to 3 hours after dosing or until stopped by participant, or rescue medication was administered.
|
0 to 3 hours on Day 1
|
|
Time to Rescue Medication After Initial Dose, and After Each Subsequent Dose
Time Frame: Post-Dose on Day 1 up to Day 10
|
Participants used only acetaminophen at a dose of 500 milligram (mg) every 6 hours product as needed (PRN) as rescue medication during the course of the study.
Participants who used acetaminophen were to record its use, and date and time of administration in the participant diary.
Time to rescue medication after initial dose, after each subsequent dose, provided that in each dose interval at least 25% of the participants take rescue medication was analyzed using the proportional hazard model with site, treatment group, and baseline categorical ankle pain terms in the model.
|
Post-Dose on Day 1 up to Day 10
|
|
Number of Doses of Rescue Medication Used During the First 7 Days of Dosing
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 7
|
Participants received only acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 hours PRN as rescue medication during the course of the study.
|
Baseline up to Day 7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Taking Rescue Medication
Time Frame: Post first dose Day 1 up to Day 10
|
Participants used only acetaminophen at a dose of 500 mg every 6 hours PRN as analgesia or rescue therapy during the course of the study.
Participants who used acetaminophen were to record its use, and date and time of administration in the participant diary.
|
Post first dose Day 1 up to Day 10
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 13, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
September 18, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
May 26, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 19, 2016
Last Verified
April 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- B3491009
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Oregon State UniversityTerminatedNeural Inhibition | Injuries, AnkleUnited States
-
University of VirginiaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Ankle Sprain | Chronic Ankle Instability, CAIUnited States
-
Shaikh Zayed Hospital, LahoreCompletedBimalleolar Ankle FracturePakistan
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityBauerfeindNot yet recruitingAnkle Fracture | Ankle ArthrodesisCanada
-
University of DelawareCompletedAnkle Sprains | Ankle InstabilityUnited States
-
Georgia State UniversityNational Athletic Trainers' Association Research & Education Foundation (NATA...CompletedChronic Ankle Instability | Ankle Sprains | Ankle RehabilitationUnited States
-
Creighton UniversityCompletedChronic Ankle Instability | Ankle SprainsUnited States
-
University of LiegeRecruitingAnkle Sprain | Chronic Ankle Instability, CAIBelgium
-
Guangzhou University of Chinese MedicineNot yet recruitingChronic Ankle Instability | Lateral Ankle Sprain
Clinical Trials on Topical IBU twice daily
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillYale University; Rush University Medical Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPleural Effusion | Empyema, Pleural | Empyema | Pleural Effusion Associated With Pulmonary Infection | Complicated Pleural Effusion/ Empyema | Pleural Infection Bacterial | Pleural Infections and Inflammations | Pleural InfectionsUnited States
-
Galderma R&DCompleted
-
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories LimitedCompleted
-
Combined Military Hospital AbbottabadNot yet recruiting
-
Manal AbdelmalekCompletedNonalcoholic SteatohepatitisUnited States
-
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, IncTerminated
-
Case Western Reserve UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); MetroHealth Medical CenterCompletedCritical IllnessUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityXiangya Hospital of Central South University; Second Affiliated Hospital, School... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHematologic Malignancy | Bronchiolitis Obliterans SyndromeChina