- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01956942
Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty (MLT) Versus Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) for Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma
Phase IV Study of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty Versus Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Glaucoma is the 2nd leading cause of blindness worldwide and affects over 2.5 million Americans over the age of 40. It is thought that elevated intraocular pressure causes damage to the optic nerve fibers which leads to silent vision loss in glaucoma. Therefore, the primary approach to managing this disease process is through intraocular pressure reduction with a) topical drops that decrease intraocular fluid production or increase fluid outflow, b) laser therapy to the outflow structures in the eye (trabecular meshwork) to increase fluid egression, c) or incisional surgery with or without placement of setons to create a new pathway for fluid outflow. When medical therapy has been maximized or patients do not tolerate topical therapy, laser trabeculoplasty is common applied to achieve further intraocular pressure reduction. There are two types of laser therapies: argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). The former involves applying laser to create outflow pathways in the trabecular meshwork (TM) and induces thermal damage to the TM. The latter selectively applies energy which induces inflammatory restructuring of the TM without creating a burn. Studies have shown comparable results between the two treatment modalities with SLT offering the advantage of repeatable treatment. Studies have also shown laser trabeculoplasty to be comparable to the effect of topical drops in intraocular pressure reduction. Side effects for both types of laser trabeculoplasty include post procedure intraocular pressure elevation and intraocular inflammation which is treated with topical drops after the procedure.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of micropulse laser trabeculoplasty in intraocular pressure reduction in patients with open angle glaucoma as compared to conventional selective laser trabeculoplasty. Secondary aims would be to determine whether its reduction is comparable to that of topical intraocular pressure lowering drops, length of therapeutic intraocular pressure reduction, and incidence of side effects commonly encountered with traditional laser trabeculoplasty including intraocular inflammation and intraocular pressure spikes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of any ange age
- Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma who have not had recent changes in their medication regimen.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with active neovascularization of the angle, angle closure glaucoma, angle recession, or anterior uveitis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty
Patient's randomized to MLT would be treated with the following settings: 300 micron spot size, 0.3 second duration, 15% duty cycle, and 1000 milliWatt power.
They would be treated with confluent laser spots across the entire 360 degrees of the trabecular meshwork.
Each patient would receive pre-treatment with a drop on iopidine or brimonidine to prevent post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes as per standard pre-laser trabeculoplasty protocol.
|
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT)
Patient's randomized to SLT would be treated with the following settings: 400 micron spot size, 0.3 second duration, and 1.00 milliWatt (mW) power.
They would be treated with confluent laser spots across the entire 360 degrees of the trabecular meshwork.
Each patient would receive pre-treatment with a drop on iopidine or brimonidine to prevent post-operative IOP spikes as per standard pre-laser trabeculoplasty protocol.
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraocular Pressure Reduction
Time Frame: within 6 weeks to 3 months after the laser procedure is completed
|
evaluate the effectiveness of micropulse laser trabeculoplasty in intraocular pressure reduction in patients with open angle glaucoma as compared to conventional selective laser trabeculoplasty The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma patients. |
within 6 weeks to 3 months after the laser procedure is completed
|
|
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction Comparison Between MLT and SLT
Time Frame: 24-52 week interval
|
Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction comparison between MLT and SLT
|
24-52 week interval
|
|
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
Percentage of participants with a decrease of greater or equal to 3 mmHg intraocular pressure from baseline
|
52 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Measurement of Pain/Inflammation by a Pain Scale Post Laser Treatments From Micropulse and Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.
Time Frame: at the time of treatment and at 1 week following the laser procedure
|
The measurement of pain commonly encountered with traditional laser trabeculoplasty including intraocular inflammation will be measured and compared between both lasers (SLT vs. MLT). Standardized pain survey (scale of 0=none and 10=severe) Higher number, the more pain was being experienced by subject |
at the time of treatment and at 1 week following the laser procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Belyea, MD, George Washington University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Detry-Morel M, Muschart F, Pourjavan S. Micropulse diode laser (810 nm) versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: comparative short-term safety and efficacy profile. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2008;(308):21-8.
- Juzych MS, Chopra V, Banitt MR, Hughes BA, Kim C, Goulas MT, Shin DH. Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2004 Oct;111(10):1853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.030.
- Fea AM, Bosone A, Rolle T, Brogliatti B, Grignolo FM. Micropulse diode laser trabeculoplasty (MDLT): A phase II clinical study with 12 months follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;2(2):247-52. doi: 10.2147/opth.s2303.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 041310
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Open Angle Glaucoma
-
Henry Ford Health SystemNot yet recruitingPrimary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) | Secondary Open Angle Glaucoma | Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG)United States
-
Glostrup University Hospital, CopenhagenRecruitingGlaucoma | Open-Angle Glaucoma | Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)Denmark
-
AllerganCompleted18 Month Prospective Efficacy and Safety Study of Bimatoprost Intracameral Implant (DURYSTA) (ARGOS)Ocular Hypertension | Open-angle GlaucomaUnited States
-
Sanoculis LtdActive, not recruitingOcular Hypertension | Glaucoma | Open-Angle GlaucomaArmenia
-
Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en MéxicoTerminated
-
Aerie PharmaceuticalsCompletedOcular Hypertension | Open-angle Glaucoma
-
West Virginia UniversityUniversity of Pittsburgh; University of MichiganWithdrawnOpen-angle Glaucoma
-
Glaukos CorporationUnknownOpen-Angle GlaucomaSpain, Germany, Austria, Turkey
-
Alcon ResearchWithdrawnOpen-Angle Glaucoma
Clinical Trials on Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeUnknownPrimary Open Angle GlaucomaSingapore
-
University Hospital of PatrasCompletedMicropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Pseudoexfoliation GlaucomaPrimary Open-angle Glaucoma | Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma
-
Belkin Laser Ltd.CompletedOpen Angle GlaucomaGeorgia
-
Minia UniversityCompletedAcute Central Serous Retinopathy With Subretinal FluidEgypt
-
Beijing HospitalNot yet recruitingCentral Serous Chorioretinopathy
-
Queen's UniversityTerminated
-
Western University, CanadaCompletedOcular Hypertension | Intraocular Pressure | Primary Open Angle Glaucoma of Both EyesCanada
-
Lumibird Medical (Quantel Medical, Ellex Medical...Quantel MedicalRecruitingGlaucoma,Open-Angle | Ocular Hypertension (OH)Australia
-
University of ZurichUnknownOcular Hypertension | Open Angle Glaucoma,Switzerland
-
University Hospital, GenevaTerminatedGlaucoma and Ocular HypertensionSwitzerland