Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty (MLT) Versus Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) for Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma

May 19, 2023 updated by: David Belyea

Phase IV Study of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty Versus Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new laser (called Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty or MLT) in the treatment of glaucoma compared to the conventional laser presently used which is called selective laser trabeculoplasty or SLT. Both lasers (SLT and MLT) are used as standard of care in the treatment of open angle glaucoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Glaucoma is the 2nd leading cause of blindness worldwide and affects over 2.5 million Americans over the age of 40. It is thought that elevated intraocular pressure causes damage to the optic nerve fibers which leads to silent vision loss in glaucoma. Therefore, the primary approach to managing this disease process is through intraocular pressure reduction with a) topical drops that decrease intraocular fluid production or increase fluid outflow, b) laser therapy to the outflow structures in the eye (trabecular meshwork) to increase fluid egression, c) or incisional surgery with or without placement of setons to create a new pathway for fluid outflow. When medical therapy has been maximized or patients do not tolerate topical therapy, laser trabeculoplasty is common applied to achieve further intraocular pressure reduction. There are two types of laser therapies: argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). The former involves applying laser to create outflow pathways in the trabecular meshwork (TM) and induces thermal damage to the TM. The latter selectively applies energy which induces inflammatory restructuring of the TM without creating a burn. Studies have shown comparable results between the two treatment modalities with SLT offering the advantage of repeatable treatment. Studies have also shown laser trabeculoplasty to be comparable to the effect of topical drops in intraocular pressure reduction. Side effects for both types of laser trabeculoplasty include post procedure intraocular pressure elevation and intraocular inflammation which is treated with topical drops after the procedure.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of micropulse laser trabeculoplasty in intraocular pressure reduction in patients with open angle glaucoma as compared to conventional selective laser trabeculoplasty. Secondary aims would be to determine whether its reduction is comparable to that of topical intraocular pressure lowering drops, length of therapeutic intraocular pressure reduction, and incidence of side effects commonly encountered with traditional laser trabeculoplasty including intraocular inflammation and intraocular pressure spikes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of any ange age
  • Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma who have not had recent changes in their medication regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active neovascularization of the angle, angle closure glaucoma, angle recession, or anterior uveitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty
Patient's randomized to MLT would be treated with the following settings: 300 micron spot size, 0.3 second duration, 15% duty cycle, and 1000 milliWatt power. They would be treated with confluent laser spots across the entire 360 degrees of the trabecular meshwork. Each patient would receive pre-treatment with a drop on iopidine or brimonidine to prevent post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes as per standard pre-laser trabeculoplasty protocol.
Other Names:
  • MLT
  • Laser
Active Comparator: Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT)
Patient's randomized to SLT would be treated with the following settings: 400 micron spot size, 0.3 second duration, and 1.00 milliWatt (mW) power. They would be treated with confluent laser spots across the entire 360 degrees of the trabecular meshwork. Each patient would receive pre-treatment with a drop on iopidine or brimonidine to prevent post-operative IOP spikes as per standard pre-laser trabeculoplasty protocol.
Other Names:
  • SLT
  • Laser

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraocular Pressure Reduction
Time Frame: within 6 weeks to 3 months after the laser procedure is completed

evaluate the effectiveness of micropulse laser trabeculoplasty in intraocular pressure reduction in patients with open angle glaucoma as compared to conventional selective laser trabeculoplasty

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma patients.

within 6 weeks to 3 months after the laser procedure is completed
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction Comparison Between MLT and SLT
Time Frame: 24-52 week interval
Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction comparison between MLT and SLT
24-52 week interval
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Percentage of participants with a decrease of greater or equal to 3 mmHg intraocular pressure from baseline
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of Pain/Inflammation by a Pain Scale Post Laser Treatments From Micropulse and Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.
Time Frame: at the time of treatment and at 1 week following the laser procedure

The measurement of pain commonly encountered with traditional laser trabeculoplasty including intraocular inflammation will be measured and compared between both lasers (SLT vs. MLT).

Standardized pain survey (scale of 0=none and 10=severe) Higher number, the more pain was being experienced by subject

at the time of treatment and at 1 week following the laser procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Belyea, MD, George Washington University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

October 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Open Angle Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty

Subscribe