- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01965288
Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism
A Single-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism Over 1 Month of Daily Wear.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Valencia, Spain
- Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
- Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
- Is an adapted soft toric contact lens wearer
- Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive)
- Have no less than 0.75diopter (D) of astigmatism and no more than 2.25D in both eyes.
- Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
- Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
- Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
- Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses.
- Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, > 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so).
- Is willing to comply with the visit schedule
Exclusion Criteria:
A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses.
- Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.25 D of cylinder in either eye.
- Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
- Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
- Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
- Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- Pathological dry eye or associated findings
- Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
- Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
- Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
- Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
- Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
- History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
- Poor personal hygiene
- Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
- Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
- Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: comfilcon A
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
|
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: lotrafilcon B
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
|
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
|
Baseline
|
|
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
|
Baseline
|
|
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
|
Baseline
|
|
Vision Stability Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
|
Baseline
|
|
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
|
Baseline
|
|
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
|
Baseline
|
|
Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
Baseline
|
|
Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
Baseline
|
|
Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for handling satisfaction.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
Baseline
|
|
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
Baseline
|
|
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for vision satisfaction.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
Baseline
|
|
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant rating for overall satisfaction.
Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
Baseline
|
|
Comfort Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Participant rating of comfort upon insertion.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(0-10; 10=Can't Feel)
|
Dispense
|
|
Vision Satisfaction Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Participant rating of vision satisfaction upon insertion.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(0-10; 10= Very Satisfied)
|
Dispense
|
|
Vision Quality With Contact Lens Prescription
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Participant rating of Vision Quality with contact lens prescription.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
|
Dispense
|
|
Vision Stability Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
|
Dispense
|
|
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA).
Collected at dispense for each lens.
logMAR (VA).
|
Dispense
|
|
Centration
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(Biomicroscopy; centered or slightly decentered)
|
Dispense
|
|
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
|
Dispense
|
|
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
|
Dispense
|
|
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
|
Dispense
|
|
Lens Marking Visibility
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
|
Dispense
|
|
Lens Stability on Blink
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
|
Dispense
|
|
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min)
|
Dispense
|
|
Lens Overall Stability
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
(Excellent or Good)
|
Dispense
|
|
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation.
(30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
|
Dispense
|
|
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: Dispense
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance.
Collected at dispense for each lens.
Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone.
(0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
|
Dispense
|
|
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
(Yes, No)
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
|
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
(Yes, No)
|
4 Weeks
|
|
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for handling satisfaction.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for handling satisfaction.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for vision satisfaction.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for vision satisfaction.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant rating for overall satisfaction.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant rating for overall satisfaction.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Wavefront Aberrations Root Mean Square (RMS) (3mm)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Assessment of wavefront aberrations.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (3mm)
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
|
Assessment of wavefront aberrations.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
|
4 Weeks
|
|
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Assessment of wavefront aberrations.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
|
Assessment of wavefront aberrations.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
|
4 Weeks
|
|
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA) |
2 Weeks
|
|
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
|
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA) |
4 Weeks
|
|
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze.
Assessed at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze.
Assessed at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation.
(30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation.
(30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Lens Surface Deposits
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of lens front surface deposits.
Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens.
(Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lens Surface Deposits
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of lens front surface deposits.
Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens.
(Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Centration
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered.
(Biomicroscopy)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Centration
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered.
(Biomicroscopy)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage.
Collected at 2 weks for each lens.
Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
(0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
(0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Lens Marking Visibility
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
(1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lens Marking Visibility
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
(1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Lens Stability on Blink
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
(No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lens Stability on Blink
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
(No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Overall Stability
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
(Excellent or Good.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Overall Stability
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
(Excellent or Good.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance.
Collected at 2 weeks for each lens.
Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone.
(0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance.
Collected at 4 weeks for each lens.
Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone.
(0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
Baseline
|
|
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
Baseline
|
|
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
Baseline
|
|
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
Baseline
|
|
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Corneal Neovascularization
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Investigators' objective assessment of ocular health.
Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
Baseline
|
|
Corneal Neovascularization
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Corneal Neovascularization
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Corneal Infiltrates
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
Baseline
|
|
Corneal Infiltrates
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Corneal Infiltrates
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Assessment of ocular health.
Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses.
Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall.
(Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall.
(Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall.
(Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall.
(Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Participants Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lenses to the Study Lenses
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participants likelihood of switching from habitual lenses to either pair of the study lenses when asked; How likely are they to switch from their habitual lenses to either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?"
Collected at 4 weeks for each study pair.
(4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Participants Likelihood of Continuing to Wear the Study Lenses.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Participants likelihood of continuing to wear either of the pairs of study lenses when asked; "How likely are they to continue to wearing either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?"
Collected at 4 weeks fore each study pair.
(4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
|
4 weeks
|
|
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "What study lens they will most likely recommend to friends, family or colleagues?"
Collected at end of study.
(Forced choice; First Study Lenses, Second Study Lenses)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Participant Likelihood of Recommending a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "How likely are they to recommend either the first pair of study lenses or the second pair of study lenses to friends, family or colleagues?"
Collected at study end.
(4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or Either of the Study Lenses
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?"
Collected at study end.
(Forced choice; habitual lenses, first study lenses, second study lenses)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Participant Preference for Either of the Study Lenses
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?"
Collected at study end.
(Forced choice; first study lenses, second study lenses, neither)
|
8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert Montés-Mico, OD MPhil PhD, Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EX-MKTG-42
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Astigmatism
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedNot yet recruiting
-
Ohio State UniversityAlcon ResearchRecruitingAstigmatism BilateralUnited States
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedAstigmatism BilateralUnited States
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS TrustBausch & Lomb IncorporatedUnknown
-
Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.CompletedMixed AstigmatismUnited States
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Completed
Clinical Trials on comfilcon A
-
CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)Centre for Ocular Research & Education, CanadaRecruiting
-
CooperVision, Inc.CompletedPresbyopiaUnited States
-
CooperVision, Inc.CompletedPresbyopiaUnited States
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
CooperVision, Inc.CompletedAstigmatism | MyopiaUnited States
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Visioncare Research Ltd.; Foresight Regulatory Strategies, Inc.CompletedRefractive Error
-
CooperVision, Inc.CompletedMyopiaUnited States, United Kingdom