Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism

July 19, 2020 updated by: CooperVision, Inc.

A Single-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism Over 1 Month of Daily Wear.

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Biofinity Toric (comfilcon A) contact lens, versus Air Optix for Astigmatism (lotrafilcon B) over 1 month of daily wear.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Single masked, open label, randomized, bilateral, crossover study design comparing comfilcon A against lotrafilcon B lenses over 1 month of daily wear for each study lens. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain
        • Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:

  • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
  • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
  • Is an adapted soft toric contact lens wearer
  • Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive)
  • Have no less than 0.75diopter (D) of astigmatism and no more than 2.25D in both eyes.
  • Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
  • Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
  • Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, > 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so).
  • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

Exclusion Criteria:

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:

  • Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.25 D of cylinder in either eye.
  • Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
  • Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
  • Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
  • Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:

    • Pathological dry eye or associated findings
    • Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
    • Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
    • Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
    • Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
    • Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
    • History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
    • Poor personal hygiene
  • Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
  • Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
  • Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: comfilcon A
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
  • Biofinity Toric
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
  • Air Optix
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: lotrafilcon B
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
  • Biofinity Toric
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Other Names:
  • Air Optix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Baseline
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Baseline
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Baseline
Vision Stability Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Baseline
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Baseline
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Baseline
Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Baseline
Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Baseline
Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Baseline
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Baseline
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Baseline
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Baseline
Comfort Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time Frame: Dispense
Participant rating of comfort upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10=Can't Feel)
Dispense
Vision Satisfaction Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time Frame: Dispense
Participant rating of vision satisfaction upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10= Very Satisfied)
Dispense
Vision Quality With Contact Lens Prescription
Time Frame: Dispense
Participant rating of Vision Quality with contact lens prescription. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Dispense
Vision Stability Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time Frame: Dispense
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Dispense
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at dispense for each lens. logMAR (VA).
Dispense
Centration
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Biomicroscopy; centered or slightly decentered)
Dispense
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Dispense
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Dispense
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Dispense
Lens Marking Visibility
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at dispense for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Dispense
Lens Stability on Blink
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at dispense for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Dispense
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min)
Dispense
Lens Overall Stability
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Excellent or Good)
Dispense
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at dispense for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Dispense
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Dispense
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
2 weeks
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
4 weeks
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
2 Weeks
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
4 Weeks
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
2 weeks
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
4 weeks
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
2 weeks
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
4 weeks
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
2 weeks
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
4 weeks
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
2 weeks
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
4 weeks
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
2 weeks
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
4 weeks
Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
2 weeks
Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
4 weeks
Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
2 weeks
Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
4 weeks
Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
2 weeks
Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
4 weeks
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
2 weeks
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
4 weeks
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
2 weeks
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
4 weeks
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
2 weeks
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
4 weeks
Wavefront Aberrations Root Mean Square (RMS) (3mm)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
2 Weeks
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (3mm)
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
4 Weeks
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
2 Weeks
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
4 Weeks
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: 2 Weeks

Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA).

Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)

2 Weeks
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: 4 Weeks

Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA).

Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)

4 Weeks
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
2 weeks
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
4 weeks
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
2 weeks
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
4 weeks
Lens Surface Deposits
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
2 weeks
Lens Surface Deposits
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
4 weeks
Centration
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
2 weeks
Centration
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
4 weeks
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
2 weeks
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
4 weeks
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
2 weeks
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
4 weeks
Lens Marking Visibility
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
2 weeks
Lens Marking Visibility
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
4 weeks
Lens Stability on Blink
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
2 weeks
Lens Stability on Blink
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
4 weeks
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
2 weeks
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
4 weeks
Overall Stability
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
2 weeks
Overall Stability
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
4 weeks
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
2 weeks
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Baseline
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
2 weeks
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
4 weeks
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Baseline
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
2 weeks
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
4 weeks
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Baseline
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
2 weeks
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
4 weeks
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Baseline
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
2 weeks
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
4 weeks
Corneal Neovascularization
Time Frame: Baseline
Investigators' objective assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Baseline
Corneal Neovascularization
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
2 weeks
Corneal Neovascularization
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
4 weeks
Corneal Infiltrates
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Baseline
Corneal Infiltrates
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
2 weeks
Corneal Infiltrates
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
4 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
2 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
2 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
4 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
4 weeks
Participants Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lenses to the Study Lenses
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants likelihood of switching from habitual lenses to either pair of the study lenses when asked; How likely are they to switch from their habitual lenses to either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks for each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
4 weeks
Participants Likelihood of Continuing to Wear the Study Lenses.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants likelihood of continuing to wear either of the pairs of study lenses when asked; "How likely are they to continue to wearing either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks fore each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
4 weeks
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "What study lens they will most likely recommend to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at end of study. (Forced choice; First Study Lenses, Second Study Lenses)
8 weeks
Participant Likelihood of Recommending a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "How likely are they to recommend either the first pair of study lenses or the second pair of study lenses to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at study end. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
8 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or Either of the Study Lenses
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; habitual lenses, first study lenses, second study lenses)
8 weeks
Participant Preference for Either of the Study Lenses
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; first study lenses, second study lenses, neither)
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Montés-Mico, OD MPhil PhD, Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EX-MKTG-42

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Astigmatism

Clinical Trials on comfilcon A

Subscribe