Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Myelofibrosis (Simplify 1)

May 10, 2023 updated by: Sierra Oncology, Inc.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Active-controlled Study Evaluating Momelotinib vs. Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post-Polycythemia Vera or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (Post-PV/ET MF)

This study is to determine the efficacy of momelotinib (MMB) versus ruxolitinib (RUX) in participants with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) or post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF) who have not yet received treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAK inhibitor).

Participants will be randomized to receive either MMB or ruxolitinib for 24 weeks during a double-blind treatment phase, after which they will be eligible to receive open-label MMB for up to an additional 216 weeks. After discontinuation of study medication, assessments will continue for 12 additional weeks, after which participants will be contacted for survival follow-up approximately every 6 months for up to 5 years from the date of enrollment or until study termination. For those participants planning to continue treatment with MMB following the end of the study, the Early Study Drug Discontinuation (ESDD), 30-day, 12-Week, and survival follow-up visits are not required.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

432

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
      • Parkville, New South Wales, Australia
      • Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
      • Herston, Queensland, Australia
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
      • Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
    • Victoria
      • Frankston, Victoria, Australia
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Western Australia
      • Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    • Vienna
      • Wien, Vienna, Austria
      • Antwerp, Belgium
      • Leuven, Belgium
      • Liege, Belgium
    • Hainaut
      • Charleroi, Hainaut, Belgium
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
      • Ruse, Bulgaria
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
      • Varna, Bulgaria
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
      • Brno, Czechia
      • Ostrava, Czechia
    • Vychodocesky KRAJ
      • Hradec Kralove, Vychodocesky KRAJ, Czechia
      • Aalborg, Denmark
      • Herlev, Denmark
      • Le Kremlin Bicetre Cedex, France
      • Lens, France
      • Lille Cedex, France
      • Marseille Cedex 9, France
      • Nantes cedex 1, France
      • Paris, France
      • Pessac Cedex, France
      • Villejuif Cedex, France
    • Midi-pyrenees
      • Toulouse cedex 9, Midi-pyrenees, France
    • Rhone-alpes
      • Pierre Bénite Cedex, Rhone-alpes, France
      • Dresden, Germany
      • Dusseldorf, Germany
      • Freiburg, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Mainz, Germany
      • Mannheim, Germany
    • Bayern
      • München, Bayern, Germany
    • Sachsen
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
      • Budapest, Hungary
      • Debrecen, Hungary
      • Kaposvár, Hungary
      • Afula, Israel
      • Ashkelon, Israel
      • Haifa, Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel
      • Tel Aviv, Israel
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Fukushima City, Japan
      • Kumamoto City, Japan
      • Matsuyama, Japan
      • Okayama, Japan
    • Gifu
      • Ogaki City, Gifu, Japan
    • Hokkaido
      • Kitaku Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
    • Osaka
      • Osaka Sayama, Osaka, Japan
      • Osaka-City, Osaka, Japan
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
      • Bialystok, Poland
      • Brzozow, Poland
      • Chorzow, Poland
    • Lodzkie
      • Lodz, Lodzkie, Poland
    • Lubelskie
      • Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland
    • Malopolskie
      • Kraków, Malopolskie, Poland
    • Mazowiekie
      • Warszawa, Mazowiekie, Poland
    • Pomorskie
      • Gdansk, Pomorskie, Poland
    • Wielkopolskie
      • Poznan, Wielkopolskie, Poland
      • Arad, Romania
      • Brasov, Romania
      • Bucuresti, Romania
      • Cluj-Napoca, Romania
      • Iasi, Romania
      • Singapore, Singapore
      • Badalona, Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Valencia, Spain
      • Zaragoza, Spain
    • Madrid
      • Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
    • Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
      • Stockholm, Sweden
      • Uddevalla, Sweden
      • Örebro, Sweden
    • Skane
      • Lund, Skane, Sweden
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan
      • Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom
    • England
      • Leicester, England, United Kingdom
      • London, England, United Kingdom
      • Manchester, England, United Kingdom
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
      • Oxford, England, United Kingdom
    • Wales
      • Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Escondido, California, United States
      • Stanford, California, United States
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Palpable splenomegaly at least 5 cm below the left costal margin
  • Confirmed diagnosis of PMF or post-PV/ET MF
  • Requires myelofibrosis therapy, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Classified as high risk OR intermediate-2 risk as defined by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for PMF, or intermediate-1 risk (IPSS) associated with symptomatic splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anemia (hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dL), and/or unresponsive to available therapy
  • Acceptable laboratory assessment obtained within 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 0.75 x 10^9/L in the absence of growth factor in the prior 7 days
    • Platelet Count ≥ 50 x 10^9/L (≥ 100 x 10^9/L if aspartate aminotransferase [AST] or alanine aminotransferase [ALT] is ≥ 2 x the upper limit of the normal range [ULN]) in the absence of platelet transfusion(s) or thrombopoietin mimetics in the prior 7 days
    • Peripheral blood blast count < 10%
    • AST and ALT ≤ 3 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN if liver is involved by extramedullary hematopoiesis as judged by the investigator or if related to iron chelator therapy that was started within the prior 60 days)
    • Calculated creatinine clearance (CrCL) of ≥ 45 mL/min
    • Direct bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN
  • Life expectancy of > 24 weeks
  • Males and females of childbearing potential must agree to use protocol-specified method(s) of contraception
  • Females who are nursing must agree to discontinue nursing before the first dose of study drug
  • Able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent form

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior splenectomy
  • Splenic irradiation within 3 months prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Eligible for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
  • Uncontrolled inter-current illness, per protocol.
  • Known positive status for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Chronic active or acute viral hepatitis A, B, or C infection, or a hepatitis B or C carrier
  • Prior use of a JAK1 or JAK2 inhibitor
  • Use of chemotherapy, immunomodulating therapy, biologic therapy, radiation therapy, or investigational therapy within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug
  • Presence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 2
  • Unwilling or unable to undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Momelotinib
Participants will receive momelotinib plus placebo to match ruxolitinib.
Momelotinib tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
  • GS-0387
  • CYT387
Placebo to match ruxolitinib tablets administered orally twice daily
Active Comparator: Ruxolitinib
Participants will receive ruxolitinib plus placebo to match momelotinib.
Ruxolitinib tablets administered orally twice daily
Placebo to match momelotinib tablets administered orally once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Splenic Response Rate at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Splenic response rate at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥ 35% from baseline at the Week 24 assessment as measured by MRI or CT.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24

Total symptom score (TSS) is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a ≥50% reduction in TSS at Week 24 versus baseline as measured by the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) v2.0 diary. Response rate was calculated using the average of the daily TSS from a consecutive 28-day period prior to Week 24, which had ≥20 daily TSS available.

The modified MPN-SAF patient-reported outcome instrument consisted of 8 items assessing worst daily incidence of tiredness, filling up quickly, abdominal discomfort, night sweats, itching, bone pain, pain under ribs on left side, and inactivity. Scoring of the Total Symptom Score (TSS), in this study was based on 7 of these items, (range of 0-70,), excluding inactivity. These items assess the impact experienced by the participant in the 24 hours prior to completing the questionnaire. All items are measured using a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 corresponding to "Absent" and 10 being the worse

Week 24
Rate of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions in the Double-blind Phase, (the Average Number of RBC Units Transfused Per Month Not Associated With Overt Bleeding)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Rate of RBC transfusion was defined as the average number of RBC units transfused not associated with clinically overt bleeding per subject-month during the double-blind phase.
Baseline to Week 24
RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)
Time Frame: Week 24
RBC transfusion independence is the percentage of participants who are transfusion independent at Week 24, defined as absence of RBC transfusions and no hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL in the 12 weeks prior to Week 24, excluding cases associated with clinically overt bleeding.
Week 24
RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).
Time Frame: Week 24
RBC transfusion dependence is the percentage of participants who are transfusion dependent at Week 24, defined as having had at least 4 units of RBC transfusions, or a hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL in 8 weeks prior to Week 24 (excluding cases associated with clinically overt bleeding). Participants with the last double-blind phase participation date prior to Day 162 (ie. missing at Week 24) were considered transfusion dependent at Week 24.
Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gilead Study Director, Gilead Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Myelofibrosis

Clinical Trials on Momelotinib

3
Subscribe