Comparing FARES Method With SPASO Method for Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: a Prospective Randomized Trial
November 3, 2013 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital
Shoulder anterior dislocation is a major disease entity in emergency department.
There are more than 10 reduction methods that have been reported.
Traditional reduction methods require sedatives, which could cause adverse effects on the patients such as respiratory suppression and allergy.
There are some reduction maneuvers reported recently which do not need sedatives prior to performing reduction, including FARES method and SPASO method.
So far, there are no well-designed study to compare these two methods.
Besides, in clinical experience, we found that combining these two methods could even get higher successful reduction rate.
This study is aimed to compare these two methods as a prospective randomized design, and furthermore, to show that combining these two methods could get higher successful reduction rate.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
- National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- shoulder anterior dislocation
- conscious clear
- communicable
Exclusion Criteria:
- unconscious
- non-communicable
- humeral neck fracture
- dislocation time > 24 hours
- neurovascular compromise
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SPASO method, FARES method
Reduction method: SPASO method, FARES method
|
SPASO method and FARES method as shoulder dislocation reduction methods
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Successful reduction rate
Time Frame: Less than 30 minutes
|
Less than 30 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
July 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 3, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
November 8, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 8, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 3, 2013
Last Verified
October 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201307037RINC
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.