A Novel Low-Cost Tool for a More Efficient and Reliable Weight-for-Height/Length Assessment (Yared's-tool)

December 17, 2018 updated by: JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.
Weight-for-height/length z-score is one of the indicators used to diagnose acute malnutrition. In the existing method, the assessment involves three steps and takes significant time with a wider room for errors. A new tool is developed to address these drawbacks. A preliminary testing done show encouraging results, but a more robust study is needed. This research will b done with the objective of comparing diagnostic efficiency and reliability of the 'new' method against the 'existing' one using a diagnostic randomized clinical trial method.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute malnutrition is a major underlying and direct cause of child death. Weight-for-height/length z score (WHZ) is one of the indicators used to assess nutritional status of children. In the existing method, the assessment involves three steps; measuring height, measuring weight and deciding WHZ using a reference graphs or tables. The assessment takes significant time and has wider room for errors. Due to these drawbacks, it is not used at community level where regular active finding takes place.

A new tool is developed to address these drawbacks. It reduces the steps to two aiming at reducing errors and saving time and energy. This study will compare efficiency and reliability of WHZ assessments done with the new tool against the existing method using a diagnostic randomized clinical trial.

Trained health workers will do WHZ assessments in under five children mobilized for nutrition screening program. The 'average time' needed and proportions of 'classification errors' will be compared between the new and the existing methods. Assessments done by two anthropometry experts will be used as gold standard.

The study will determine the gains of the new tool and can potentially change the global practice and help early detection of huge number of wasted children that are being missed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

510

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All children under five years of age living in the study area.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children for whom weigh-for-height assessments can not be done due to physical deformities and disabilities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: New Method
'New' weight-for-height method will be used to assess children assigned to this arm
A 'new' WHZ tool will be used to assess children.
Active Comparator: Existing Method
'Existing' weight-for-height method will be used to assess children assigned to this arm
'Existing' WHZ tools will be used to assess children
Experimental: Health Extension Workers
Health Extension workers will do weight-for-height assessment using the new method
A 'new' WHZ tool will be used to assess children.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Reliability
Time Frame: In 3 months
Proportion of 'assessment errors' between the groups will be compared against that of the gold standard (i.e the assessment done by two experts for each child'
In 3 months
Efficiency of assessment
Time Frame: in 3 months
The average time needed to complete WHZ assessments using the 'new' method will be compared with that of the 'existing' method
in 3 months
Reliability of WHZ assessments done by community Health Extension Workers
Time Frame: in 3 months
Proportion of 'assessment errors' by health-extension workers will be compared with that of the 'nurses' and the 'experts'
in 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yared A Fantaye, MD, MPH, JSI Training and Research Institute, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • JSI R&T #18-46

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Nutrition assessment data is sensitive for the country and it can only be shared if the regional health bureau allows. It needs time to get their decision

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wasting

Clinical Trials on New Method

Subscribe