Optimum Insufflation Capacity in NMD

November 5, 2013 updated by: Uwe Mellies, Universität Duisburg-Essen

Optimum Insufflation Capacity and Peak Cough Flow Augmentation in Patients With Neuromuscular Disease

Patients with underlying neuromuscular disorder (NMD) often suffer from weakness in the inspiratory and expiratory muscles. Consequently they do not have the strength to generate the minimum flow of 160 to 300 liters/minute for an efficient cough function. The restricted cough function allows secretion to accumulate, which in turn causes narrowing of the airway lumen and makes ventilation of the neuromuscular patient even more difficult. The patient's susceptibility to infection increases again and the vicious circle repeats itself. Severe secretion retention may even lead to ventilator failure. Effective secretion and cough management instead reduces the risk for stay in hospital. Therefore, secretion and cough management is a mandatory part of the therapeutic concept for treating patients with neuromuscular disease.

The therapeutic efficacy of the Lung Insufflation Assist Maneuver(LIA) integrated in the ventilator VENTIlogic LS-plus manufactured by Weinmann GmbH+Co KG was studied in a pilot study carried out by the Dep. for Pediatric Pulmonology and Sleep Medicine at the University Hospital of Essen/Germany in cooperation with Research & Development at Weinmann GmbH &Co KG, Germany . The objective of the pilot study was to examine the therapeutic efficacy of LIAM as a cough support function in patients with neuromuscular disease and indications for mechanical ventilation.

We hypothesized that i) a certain insufflation maneuver pressure may be optimal to achieve the highest individual peak cough flow and ii) that this pressure is below the pressure needed to achieve the maximum insufflation capacity. We define the lowest insufflation capacity at which the best individual PCF can be achieved as optimum insufflation capacity (OIC). The study was performed using two different techniques in order to demonstrate that findings are not dependent on maneuver details but are rather based on effects of maneuver pressure. The protocol was limited to techniques which do not require breath stacking: i) insufflation with an Intermittend Positive Pressure (IPPB) device and ii) with the VENTIlogic LS using LIAM.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • NRW
      • Essen, NRW, Germany, 45122
        • University of Essen, Children's Hospital, Dep. of Pediatric Pulmonology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • neuromuscular disorder
  • respiratory insufficiency
  • use of home mechanical ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute illness
  • history of pneumothorax

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lung Insufflation Volume
Measurement of the lung volume after hyperinsufflation with positive pressure by IPPB or LIAM
Lung insufflation with positive pressure using IPPB up from 10 to 40 mbar in 5 mbar increments and consecutive measurement of the insufflation volume
Other Names:
  • Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing = IPPB
Lung insufflation using the Lung Insufflation Assist maneuver of the Ventilogic LS mechanical ventilator (Weinmann Germany) with positive pressure up from 10 to 40 mbar in 5 mbar increments and consecutive measurement of the insufflation volume
Other Names:
  • LIAM = Lung Insufflation Assist Maneuver
Experimental: Peak Cough Flow
Measurement of the peak cough flow after hyperinsufflation with positive pressure by IPPB or LIAM
Lung insufflation with positive pressure using IPPB up from 10 to 40 mbar in 5 mbar increments and consecutive measurement of the insufflation volume
Other Names:
  • Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing = IPPB
Lung insufflation using the Lung Insufflation Assist maneuver of the Ventilogic LS mechanical ventilator (Weinmann Germany) with positive pressure up from 10 to 40 mbar in 5 mbar increments and consecutive measurement of the insufflation volume
Other Names:
  • LIAM = Lung Insufflation Assist Maneuver

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
insufflation capacity
Time Frame: change of lung volume with the procedure; during hospital stay on average 3 days
Lung volume was measured during spontaneous breathing and after a lung insufflation assist maneuver.
change of lung volume with the procedure; during hospital stay on average 3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak cough flow
Time Frame: change of peak cough flow with the procedure; during hospital stay on average 3 days
Peak cough flow was measured during spontaneous breathing and after a lung insufflation assist maneuver.
change of peak cough flow with the procedure; during hospital stay on average 3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Uwe Mellies, MD, University of Essen, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Clinical Trials on IPPB

Subscribe