Increasing Engagement in Evidence-Based PTSD Therapy for Primary Care Veterans

November 10, 2015 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
The purpose of this study is to implement an evidence-based Referral Management System that will address patient and system-level barriers to the uptake of evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD by Veterans Affairs primary care patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Within the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA), primary care (PC) patients with PTSD have low rates of engagement in evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for PTSD. Low engagement rates are due to a variety of patient-level (e.g., belief that treatment will not be helpful, stigma) and system-level barriers (e.g., lack of tracking of referral process, knowledge gaps on how to manage PTSD). We propose to conduct a pilot hybrid effectiveness- implementation study to implement an evidence-based Referral Management System (RMS) that will address patient and system-level barriers to the uptake of EBP for PTSD by VHA primary care patients. RMS will address patient-level barriers with the delivery of a 1-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention to identify and change treatment seeking beliefs that serve as an barrier to treatment engagement, including specific negative beliefs about EBP (e.g., talking about past trauma will be too difficult for me"). This CBT intervention has been previously found to be effective for increasing treatment engagement with Veterans with PTSD. Depending on Veteran preference, it will be delivered by the PC-MHI provider within the PC clinic or a Behavioral Health Lab (BHL) care manager by phone. RMS will be initiated by PACT staff and will address system-level barriers by having a BHL technician track the progress of RMS referrals and contact Veterans who have not followed thought on their chosen referral options. PACT staff will also be trained with simple scripts on how to address PTSD symptoms and make appropriate referrals based on VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines for PTSD. Our aims, implementation strategy, data collection, and analyses will be guided by established strategies. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will identify organization variables. RE-AIM will investigate program uptake and patient/ system-level impact. An Implementation Mapping approach will guide our implementation strategy. We propose to conduct this study in 3 phases. Phase 1 includes interviews with PC and MH leadership about the relevance of CFIR constructs to RMS implementation and a meeting with PACT staff to train them on RMS and gather their input on how RMS should be adapted to their clinic. A PC medical provider will serve as a clinical champion who is knowledgeable, communicative, and a leader in promoting RMS among his/her peers. Phase 2 consists of implementing RMS for 6 months in one Syracuse PC clinic and then measuring RE-AIM outcomes. Some RE-AIM outcomes compared participants who received RMS to those who did not receive RMS in a historical control group. Phase 3 involves meeting with PACT and MH Leadership and PACT staff to share a formal report of study results and gather information about potential barriers and facilitators to long-term maintenance and future expansion of RMS within the CFIR framework. An expert national stakeholder panel will also be convened to guide development of a SDP that will investigate multi-VISN implementation.

Our long-term aim of this line of research is to increase implementation of evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD by getting more primary care patients with PTSD to engage in treatment.

Our Specific Aims for this Rapid Response Project are to:

1. Assess and improve the feasibility of implementing RMS in PC-MHI/PACT settings

1A. Diagnose organizational and staff-level barriers and facilitators to implementing RMS.

1B. Adapt RMS for the local context based on information gathered about barriers and facilitators.

2. Evaluate initial impact of implementing RMS in PC-MHI/PACT settings. Assess impact of RMS on RE-AIM measures of Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance 3. Refine implementation strategy based on study findings for planned efforts to spread RMS to additional VISNs in a QUERI Phase 2 Service-Directed Project (SDP) to follow.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Team Red primary care patients,
  • have a score of at least 44 on PCL-S and
  • able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Team Red Primary Care
Eligible patients will receive the Referral Management System in primary care
Referral Management System (RMS) will address patient-level barriers with the delivery of a 1-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention to identify and change treatment seeking beliefs that serve as an barrier to treatment engagement, including specific negative beliefs about EBP (e.g., "talking about past trauma will be too difficult for me"). RMS will address system-level barriers by tracking the progress of RMS referrals and contacting Veterans who have not followed thought on their chosen referral options. Primary Care staff will also be trained with simple scripts on how to address PTSD symptoms and make appropriate referrals based on VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines for PTSD.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Engagement in Evidence-based Psychotherapy for PTSD
Time Frame: From initiation of the Referral Management System to 6 months after initiation
Engagement will be assessed by how many patients attend at least 2 sessions of an evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD and how many complete treatment. Completion is defined as 8 sessions.
From initiation of the Referral Management System to 6 months after initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD Checklist-Specific
Time Frame: Referral Management Initiation, 1 month post initiation, 3 months post initiation
Measures the 17 symptoms of PTSD according to the DSM-IV. Scale for each item ranges from 1-5. Total scale score ranges from 17-85. 17 represents no PTSD symptoms and 85 represented the most severe PTSD symptoms.
Referral Management Initiation, 1 month post initiation, 3 months post initiation
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item
Time Frame: Referral Management Initiation, 1 month post initiation, 3 months post initiation
9 symptoms of depression are measured on a 0-3 scale. Total scale range is 0-27, with higher scores indicating worse depression.
Referral Management Initiation, 1 month post initiation, 3 months post initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyle Possemato, PhD, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Referral Management System

Subscribe