- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01988584
Safety and Effectiveness of Banked Cord Blood or Bone Marrow Stem Cells in Children With Cerebral Palsy (CP). (ACT for CP)
Autologous Cell Therapies for Cerebral Palsy-Chronic (ACT for CP)
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two types of stem cells,(either banked cord blood or bone marrow), in children between the ages of 2 to 10 years with CP. 15 children with banked cord blood at CBR and 15 children without banked cord blood will be enrolled into the study. The study involves one baseline/treatment visit and 3 follow-up visits at 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years. Five children in each group will be randomized to a placebo control group at the baseline/treatment visit. Parents will not be told if their child received stem cells or a placebo until the 12 month follow-up visit. At that time parents may elect to have their child receive the stem cell treatment; either bone marrow harvest or umbilical cord blood if banked with CBR. All study visits will be conducted at the UTHealth Medical School and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston, Texas.
As of 1/21/2014 we have met our enrollment limit for children without banked cord blood undergoing bone marrow harvest for stem cells.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- UTHealth, Medical School, Dept. of Pediatric Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children with diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (spastic CP due to periventricular white matter damage or neonatal brain injury from perinatal stroke or intra-ventricular hemorrhage)
- Gross Motor Function Classification Score level II-V
- Ages 24 months to 10 years
- English speaking, if verbal
- Ability to travel to Houston for treatment and follow-up -
Exclusion Criteria:
Known history of:
- Intractable seizures
- Traumatic brain injury
- Genetic disorder (as demonstrated by newborn screening or genetic diagnostic testing)
- Recently treated or current infection
- Renal insufficiency or altered renal function (as defined by serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl at screening)
- Hepatic disease or altered liver function (as defined by SGPT > 150 U/L [non-contusion related], and/or T. Bilirubin >1.3 mg/dL at screening)
- HIV+ (as demonstrated by positive blood test)
- Immunosuppression (as defined by WBC <3,000 cells/ml at screening)
- Infectious related neurological injury
- Sensitivity to Ethylene Oxide (EtO) [found in fumigants and disinfectants]
- If Athetoid CP diagnosis, other etiologies such as degenerative, mitochondrial, and metabolic disorders must be excluded, and the outcome assessments must be able to be conducted to assess for potential treatment effects
- Normal brain MRI
- Evidence of acute illness at the time of infusion, such as, but not limited to, fever (temperature > 37.5 C), vomiting, diarrhea, wheezing or crackles
- Progressing neurological disease (as defined by Batten Disease, Leukodystrophies, Metabolic disorders, Mitochondrial disorders, Neurotransmitter disorders)
- Microcephaly, macrocephaly, cortical malformations, genetic disorders of dysgenesis brain malformations due to infection or metabolic disorders
- Pulmonary disease requiring ventilator support
- If hUCB candidate, banked cord cells totaling <10 million/kg
- If hUCB candidate, any positive maternal infectious disease test (Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, HIV 1, HIV 2, HTLV 1, HTLV 2, and Syphilis)
- If hUCB candidate, cord blood sample contamination
- Participation in a concurrent intervention study
- Unwillingness to return for follow-up visits
- Contraindications to MRI
- Any patient that the investigators feel in their opinion the study intervention is unlikely to benefit the patient will be a screen failure.
- Any patients who are currently or has previously been enrolled in a clinical stem cell study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: umbilical cord blood (UCB) cells
Children who have banked UCB with CBR will receive an umbilical cord blood stem cell infusion at the baseline/treatment visit.
|
Autologous umbilical cord blood banked with the Cord Blood Registry.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BMMNCs)
Children in the BMMNC group will undergo bone marrow harvest and stem cell infusion at the baseline/treatment visit.
|
Autologous stem cells from bone marrow harvest.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: saline infusion (placebo), then umbilical cord blood (UCB) cells
Five children in each group will be randomly assigned to receive an inactive substance (placebo) at the baseline/treatment visit.
Parents will be given the opportunity to cross-over to either the umbilical cord blood or bone marrow harvest group at the one year visit.
|
Autologous umbilical cord blood banked with the Cord Blood Registry.
Other Names:
A total of 10 children (5 from each cohort) will be randomized to a placebo infusion at the baseline visit and then have the opportunity to cross-over to stem cell treatment at the 1yr.
visit.
|
Experimental: saline infusion (placebo), then bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BMMNCs)
|
Autologous stem cells from bone marrow harvest.
Other Names:
A total of 10 children (5 from each cohort) will be randomized to a placebo infusion at the baseline visit and then have the opportunity to cross-over to stem cell treatment at the 1yr.
visit.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Safety as Assessed by Number of Participants With In-hospital Infusion Toxicity
Time Frame: 24 hours after infusion
|
In-hospital infusion toxicity includes hemodynamic, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, or neurologic complications.
|
24 hours after infusion
|
Long-term Safety
Time Frame: from the time of infusion to 1 year after infusion
|
Long-term safety as assessed by number of participants who developed new mass lesions or other pathological structural changes or had worsening neurological status
|
from the time of infusion to 1 year after infusion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants With an Improvement in White Matter Integrity.
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 year after infusion
|
Number of participants with an improvement in white matter integrity as measured by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction of corticospinal tract (CST) radial diffusivity (RD). Improvement is defined as radial diffusivity (RD) decreased in at least one corticospinal tract (CST) reconstruction. |
from baseline to 1 year after infusion
|
Gross Motor Function Classification Score (GMFM-66)
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Interval age adjusted scaled scores from 0 to 100 with 0 reflecting a child with low motor ability and 100 indicating high motor ability.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Gross Motor Function Classification Score (GMFM-66)
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Interval age adjusted scaled scores from 0 to 100 with 0 reflecting a child with low motor ability and 100 indicating high motor ability.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Gross Motor Function Classification Score (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Ordinal age adjusted scaled raw and percent scores from 0 to 100 with 0 reflecting a child with low motor ability and 100 indicating high motor ability.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Gross Motor Function Classification Score (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Ordinal age adjusted scaled raw and percent scores from 0 to 100 with 0 reflecting a child with low motor ability and 100 indicating high motor ability.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Communication
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Communication
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Daily Living
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Daily Living
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Social
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Social
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Motor
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-2) - Motor
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 140 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Self-Care
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Self-Care
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Mobility
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Mobility
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Social
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Social
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on A Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY-II) - Learning and Memory Memory Subtest - Recall
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Scales scores from 1 to 19 with higher scores indicate better outcomes and lower scores indicate poorer outcomes.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on A Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY-II) - Learning and Memory Memory Subtest - Recall
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Scales scores from 1 to 19 with higher scores indicate better outcomes and lower scores indicate poorer outcomes.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on A Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY-II) - Learning and Memory Memory Subtest - Free/Cued
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Scales scores from 1 to 19 with higher scores indicate better outcomes and lower scores indicate poorer outcomes.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on A Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY-II) - Learning and Memory Memory Subtest - Free/Cued
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Scales scores from 1 to 19 with higher scores indicate better outcomes and lower scores indicate poorer outcomes.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Expressive and Receptive Vocabulary as Assessed by Score on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4)
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 160.
Higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Expressive and Receptive Vocabulary as Assessed by Score on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4)
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard score ranging from 20 to 160.
Higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Family
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Family
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Social
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Social
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Feelings
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Feelings
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Participation
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Participation
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Emotional
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Emotional
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Access
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Access
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Pain
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Score on Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL) - Pain
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a child with a higher level of functioning and lower scores indicate a lower level of functioning.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Visual-Spatial Processing as Assessed by Score on the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test (MVPT-3)
Time Frame: baseline before infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 55 to 145 with higher scores indicating better outcomes and lower scores poorer outcomes.
|
baseline before infusion
|
Visual-Spatial Processing as Assessed by Score on the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test (MVPT-3)
Time Frame: 1 year after infusion
|
Standard scores ranging from 55 to 145 with higher scores indicating better outcomes and lower scores poorer outcomes.
|
1 year after infusion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Charles S Cox, MD, UTHealth, Medical School, Dept. of Pediatric Surgery
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-12-0876
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
-
Northwestern UniversityActive, not recruitingCerebral Palsy | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy | Bilateral Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues...RecruitingCerebral Palsy, Dyskinetic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Infantile Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyFrance
-
St Mary's University CollegeUniversity of GloucestershireUnknownCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy Ataxic | Cerebral Palsy, MixedUnited Kingdom
-
Hilde FeysHasselt University; ETH Zurich; Curtin UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, SpasticBelgium
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingDystonic Cerebral Palsy | Dyskinetic Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
MTI UniversityEnrolling by invitationSpastic Diplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
East Carolina UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Remote Ischemic ConditioningUnited States
-
October 6 UniversityCompletedSpastic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
Marmara UniversityUnknownCerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, DiplegicTurkey
Clinical Trials on umbilical cord blood (hUCB) cells
-
Gangnam Severance HospitalDaewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.CompletedRecessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis BullosaKorea, Republic of
-
Neonatal Encephalopathy Consortium, JapanNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center; Nagoya University; Tokyo Women's... and other collaboratorsCompletedNeonatal Encephalopathy | Hypoxic-ischemic EncephalopathyJapan
-
Joanne Kurtzberg, MDAldagenCompletedAnemia, Aplastic | MDS | Inborn Errors of Metabolism | Congenital Marrow Failure | Congenital Immunodeficiency SyndromeUnited States
-
Aryn KnightM.D. Anderson Cancer Center; The University of Texas Health Science Center,... and other collaboratorsWithdrawn
-
Guangdong Women and Children HospitalUnknownSafety Issues | Effect of DrugsChina
-
Guangdong Women and Children HospitalRecruitingSafety Issues;Effect of DrugsChina
-
BHI Therapeutic SciencesUnknownAcute Ischemic StrokeUnited States
-
yangjieCompletedSafety Issues | Neonatal Death | BPD - Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaChina
-
Shenzhen Beike Bio-Technology Co., Ltd.The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityUnknown
-
Duk Lyul NaMedipost Co Ltd.UnknownMental Disorders | Brain Diseases | Central Nervous System Diseases | Nervous System Diseases | Neurodegenerative Diseases | Dementia | Alzheimer Disease | Tauopathies | Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic, Cognitive DisordersKorea, Republic of