A Study of Muscle Strength Maintenance in Older Adults

May 14, 2018 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

This research study is being done to see whether losartan can prevent the decrease in strength associated with aging.

Muscle loss is associated with aging and has multiple symptoms such as weakness, slowness, and fatigue (tiredness). Older adults with muscle weakness have a higher risk of falls and disability. In addition, the loss of independence for older adults can lead to a poorer quality of life.

Recently, it was discovered that losartan, a medication commonly used to treat high blood pressure, had slowed the strength decline seen in older mice. In addition, it allowed injured mice skeletal muscle to heal faster. Therefore, we would like to see if losartan can do the same for older adults.

Losartan is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of high blood pressure, heart failure, and to protect the kidneys in diabetic patients. Losartan is not FDA-approved to prevent the decrease in strength associated with aging.

In this study, participants age 70 and older will be asked to take losartan or a placebo to see if losartan can help prevent loss of muscle strength. A placebo is a substance that looks like the study drug but that contains no active ingredients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The loss of independence in older adults is among the most costly and disturbing events in the life span. This loss is often influenced by multiple etiologies, including medical and neurological conditions, cognitive decline, non-supportive social/environmental settings and frailty. Frailty is a syndrome of multi-systemic, age-related decline characterized by weakness, weight loss, fatigue, low levels of activity, and slowness. Frail older adults have a higher risk for adverse outcomes including hospitalization, disability, and mortality.

Recently, Johns Hopkins University Older Americans Independence Center (JHU OAIC) investigators Burks and Cohn found that blocking angiotensin type 1 receptors with losartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) in older mice markedly accelerated injured skeletal muscle healing and decreased vulnerability to disuse atrophy and strength decline. These findings provide potent rationale for testing the hypothesis that losartan attenuates strength decline and other-frailty related measures in older adults.

To prepare to test this hypothesis, a phase 2 randomized, placebo controlled pilot clinical trial of losartan in pre-frail adults over age 70 is proposed that aims to assess safety and tolerability, estimate dosing range, and estimate treatment effects using inter- and intra-subject variability of potential outcome measures. Losartan is a medication that is commonly utilized in older adults for the treatment of hypertension and is generally well tolerated in that condition and in other cardiovascular conditions.

The study will take place over 24 weeks in the Clinical Research Unit (CRU) on the Hopkins Bayview Medical Campus, where 24 pre-frail subjects will be recruited from the OAIC frailty registry. Successful completion of this study will provide the safety, dosing, and outcome measure data necessary to design the pivotal study needed to determine if longer term treatment with losartan can significantly improve frailty and related skeletal muscle phenotypes.

Interventions, such as losartan, that can prevent the decline seen in frailty have the potential to improve function and help older adults maintain their independence. This is of the utmost importance in maintaining good quality-of-life for older adults.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Clinical Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years to 100 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 70 and over
  • Pre-frail as determined by frailty criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under age 70
  • Robust or frail by frailty criteria
  • Have other indications for use of any angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) such as myocardial infarction in past year, history of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension
  • Current use of ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
  • Prior allergic reaction to or hyperkalemia with losartan or any ARB
  • Chronic renal failure with a glomerular filtration rate of < 30
  • Current daily use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents
  • Current use of steroids
  • Lower extremity disability that would prevent muscle strength testing
  • Echocardiogram-diagnosed cardiac failure as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%
  • Cognitive impairment with a Mini-Mental State Examination < 24

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Losartan
For those subjects randomized to the losartan group, they will receive losartan 25mg by mouth daily for 8 weeks, then increase to 50mg by mouth daily for another 8 weeks, then increase to 100mg by mouth daily for a final 8 weeks.
Losartan will be given in increasing doses to those in the losartan arm.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
For those subjects randomized to placebo, they will receive a placebo to take for 24 weeks total.
Placebo will be given to those in placebo arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8

Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).

The change in strength between baseline and week 8 (i.e., baseline minus week 8) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates that there was a decrease in isokinetic strength from week 0 to week 8.

Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16

Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).

The change in strength between baseline and week 16 (i.e., baseline minus week 16) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates decrease in strength from week 0 to week 16.

Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24

Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).

The change in strength between baseline and week 24 (i.e., baseline minus week 24) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates a decrease in strength from week 0 to week 24.

Baseline to Week 24
Fatiguability
Time Frame: Week 8

Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.

Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to the total work in the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.

Week 8
Fatiguability
Time Frame: Week 16

Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.

Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.

Week 16
Fatiguability
Time Frame: Week 24

Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.

Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.

Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Time Frame: from baseline to 8 weeks
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 8 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
from baseline to 8 weeks
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Time Frame: from baseline to 16 weeks
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 16 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
from baseline to 16 weeks
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Time Frame: from baseline to 24 weeks
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 24 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
from baseline to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on Losartan

Subscribe